15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:25 pm
McGentrix wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Advocate wrote:


Israel has checkpoints in the WB because there are unremitting attacks on Jewish civilians, in and out of Israel proper. There is no valid reason that Jews cannot live in the WB and Gaza; after all, Arabs may live in Israel.


I selected this, perhaps the most egregious distortion from a post filled with it.

The checkpoints within the West Bank control the movements and social/economic activity of the Palestinians, and protect Israeli settlements there. The Jews who live in the West Bank are citizens of Israel and are treated as though they are residents of Israel itself. Conversely, the Palestinian iunhabitants of the region have no political rights whatever. They are treated as neither residents nor citizens of Israel. Evidently in the eyes of Israel, its territory follows the footprints of its settlers, wherever they are. Moreover Israel believes it is morally empowered to treat its extraterritorial citizens as residents of Israel, while ignoring the existence and political rights of the people whose lands they seize and who live among them.


The obvious solution to this, at least obvious to me anyways, is to allow Israeli settlements in the West Bank, but tell them they will be under Palestinian jurisdiction if they choose to live there. They will pay taxes and utilities and what not to the Palestinian government and receive whatever they need from Palestinian sources.

Jews get to live in WB, Palestine receives the benefits of a population.

If the jews in the settlements don't like it, they can move back to Israel proper.


An excellent solution which I wholeheartedly agree with.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:28 pm
An interesting proposition. Would you also allow Paslestinians the right to settle in Israel proper, in the same manner as Israelis settle in Palestinian lands?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:34 pm
McGentrix wrote:
The obvious solution to this, at least obvious to me anyways, is to allow Israeli settlements in the West Bank, but tell them they will be under Palestinian jurisdiction if they choose to live there. They will pay taxes and utilities and what not to the Palestinian government and receive whatever they need from Palestinian sources.

Jews get to live in WB, Palestine receives the benefits of a population.

If the jews in the settlements don't like it, they can move back to Israel proper.



But then, why have "Jewish settlements" at all? I mean, according to the CIA World Factbook, out of the 2,535,927 people living in the West Bank (not counting the Israeli settlers), 17 percent are Jewish....

Looking at the numbers for Israel proper, it turns out that in terms of ethnic groups that are identified as "mostly Arab", the numbers are not really that much higher: 23.6 percent of the population are identified as non-Jewish.

If you look at it from the perspective of religious groups, the results are even more surprising: only 16 percent of the population of Israel are Muslims. Compared with the 17 percent of the population of the West Bank that are Jewish.
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:35 pm
Only one problem with your proposition, McGentrix

Israel does not recognize Palestine.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:35 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Advocate wrote:


Israel has checkpoints in the WB because there are unremitting attacks on Jewish civilians, in and out of Israel proper. There is no valid reason that Jews cannot live in the WB and Gaza; after all, Arabs may live in Israel.


I selected this, perhaps the most egregious distortion from a post filled with it.

The checkpoints within the West Bank control the movements and social/economic activity of the Palestinians, and protect Israeli settlements there. The Jews who live in the West Bank are citizens of Israel and are treated as though they are residents of Israel itself. Conversely, the Palestinian iunhabitants of the region have no political rights whatever. They are treated as neither residents nor citizens of Israel. Evidently in the eyes of Israel, its territory follows the footprints of its settlers, wherever they are. Moreover Israel believes it is morally empowered to treat its extraterritorial citizens as residents of Israel, while ignoring the existence and political rights of the people whose lands they seize and who live among them.


The obvious solution to this, at least obvious to me anyways, is to allow Israeli settlements in the West Bank, but tell them they will be under Palestinian jurisdiction if they choose to live there. They will pay taxes and utilities and what not to the Palestinian government and receive whatever they need from Palestinian sources.

Jews get to live in WB, Palestine receives the benefits of a population.

If the jews in the settlements don't like it, they can move back to Israel proper.


An excellent solution which I wholeheartedly agree with.

Cycloptichorn


Will never happen. Absolutely not.

Many of the Jews who settle in the West Bank are religious conservatives who believe the land was given to them by God. They will not submit to any Muslim authority or pay taxes to help sustain them.

As with most conservatives, religious or political, it is a my way or no way situation. They will not leave and they will not owe any allegience of any kind to a people they see as no better than animals.

The majority of Jews in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Palestinians in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's paying taxes to Jews in a Jewish enclave?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:00 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:02 pm
ican711nm wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?


Israel stirred the pot and crushed the local economy. How hard is that to figure out?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:08 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?


Israel stirred the pot and crushed the local economy. How hard is that to figure out?

Cycloptichorn

I asked George not you. Your response is silly malarkey.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:09 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?


Israel stirred the pot and crushed the local economy. How hard is that to figure out?

Cycloptichorn

I asked George not you. Your response is silly malarkey.


No it isn't.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:19 pm
Well, the Lebanese army claims it is only hunting down Fatah al-Islam militants. Fatah al-Islam is not to be confused with the Palestinian Fatah, though.

Undoubtedly to downplay the impact military action by the Lebanese army in a Palestinian refugee camp could have, the army has repeatedly stated that not Palestinian militants, but rather Fatah al-Islam militants are the target of the intervention.

Fatah al-Islam is allegedly funded/trained/supported by Syria - one of those, or maybe all of them. The cause of the conflict runs along Shiite/Sunni lines as well as along the lines of political conflict between Lebanon and Syria.

And to complicate things even further, Fatah al-Islam is reportedly cooperating with al Qaeda militants. And if that is not enough, those militants have allegedly received training in Iraq and arrived in Lebanon via Syria.


So, until the picture gets clearer, feel free to blame any of the parties involved: Lebanon for not preventing the situation, Israel for creating the chaos in Lebanon that made it easy for Fatah al-Islam to infiltrate the country, Syria for supporting Fatah al-Islam, Iraq and the US for not preventing the training of al Qaeda militants.....
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:22 pm
xingu wrote:

...
Many of the Jews who settle in the West Bank are religious conservatives who believe the land was given to them by God. They will not submit to any Muslim authority or pay taxes to help sustain them.

Many of the non-Israeli Palestinian arabs are religious conservatives who believe the land was given to them by God. They will not submit to any Jewish authority or pay taxes to help sustain them.

As with most conservatives, religious or political, it is a my way or no way situation. They will not leave and they will not owe any allegience of any kind to a people they see as no better than animals.

The majority of Jews in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Palestinians in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's paying taxes to Jews in a Jewish enclave?

The majority of Arabs not in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Jews in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's allowing a Jewish enclave to live free among them and pay them taxes?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:25 pm
Quote:
The majority of Jews in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Palestinians in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's paying taxes to Jews in a Jewish enclave?


Quote:
The majority of Arabs not in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Jews in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's allowing a Jewish enclave to live free among them and pay them taxes?



The really pathetic thing about this thread is that people on both sides often have no better argument than saying "Look, they are doing it, too!!!"

Sad.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:26 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?


Israel stirred the pot and crushed the local economy. How hard is that to figure out?

Cycloptichorn

I asked George not you. Your response is silly malarkey.


No it isn't.

Cycloptichorn

You're right. Actually it's stupid malarkey.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:33 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Once again you ignore and evade clearly stated issues, retreating behind the now well-worn collection of cant and cliches.

Like Israel, Lebanon is now having serious problems with its jihadist fanatics. Like Israel's, Lebanon's jihadist fanatics are also mass murdering non-murderers.

George, Lebanon appeared to better meet your criteria for an "open society." What is your explanation of the cause of Lebanon's current problems?


Israel stirred the pot and crushed the local economy. How hard is that to figure out?

Cycloptichorn

I asked George not you. Your response is silly malarkey.


No it isn't.

Cycloptichorn

You're right. Actually it's stupid malarkey.


A rapier wit, you're displaying today.

Bravo

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:34 pm
ican711nm wrote:
You're right. Actually it's stupid malarkey.


If that is an indicator of your desire for, and willingness to tolerate, rational discourse, then why should I respond at all?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:44 pm
old europe wrote:
Quote:
The majority of Jews in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Palestinians in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's paying taxes to Jews in a Jewish enclave?


Quote:
The majority of Arabs not in Israel, especially the conservative ones, see Jews in the same light as the Nazi's saw the Jews. Can you imagine a group of committed Nazi's allowing a Jewish enclave to live free among them and pay them taxes?



The really pathetic thing about this thread is that people on both sides often have no better argument than saying "Look, they are doing it, too!!!"

That's not an argument, it was merely my attrempt to complete xingu's argument.

My argument continues to be: the Israeli jews are not doing the samething to Israeli arabs as they are doing to the non-Israeli arabs. Why? Because the Israeli arabs are not attempting to mass murder Israeli jews.
Idea

Sad.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:51 pm
ican711nm wrote:
My argument continues to be: the Israeli jews are not doing the samething to Israeli arabs as they are doing to the non-Israeli arabs. Why? Because the Israeli arabs are not attempting to mass murder Israeli jews. Idea


Right.

Then again, what about the Jews living in the West Bank - outside the Israeli settlements? This is a serious question, btw. If 17 percent of the population of the West Bank are Jewish - are they tolerated by the Palestinians?

I posted some links earlier, but it got all but ignored...
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:52 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
You're right. Actually it's stupid malarkey.


If that is an indicator of your desire for, and willingness to tolerate, rational discourse, then why should I respond at all?

That is not an indicator of my desire for, and willingness to tolerate, rational discourse. Rather it is an indicator of my opposition to, and unwillingness to tolerate, irrational discourse.

So if you desire , and are willing to tolerate, rational discourse, please proceed to answer my question about Lebanon.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:54 pm
I don't think you should bother, O'George. Ican't is either unwilling, or, more likely, unable to make subtle distinctions with regard to the players in the middle east.

The current example is a wonderful case in point. The Lebanese army has been shelling refugee camps to get at Fatah-al-islam. Fatah-al-islam, is a Sunni Muslim group, and could not possibly survive without outside support. I don't know that Ican't has made this claim, but they have no relationship with the Fatah party among the Palestinians, which avows itself to be secular. The Sunnis represent about a quarter of the population--they are outnumbered by the Shi'ites. Hezbollah claims to represent the Shi'ites of the Lebanon. Fatah-al-islam claims to represent the Sunnis of the Lebanon, but it was only formed late last year, and is widely considered to be funded by Saudi extremists. It is doubtful that they represent even a fringe element among Lebanese Sunnis.

But to Ican't, they are all Muslim murderers, terrorists. How could you possibly expect to have a rational discussion with someone who cannot even distinguish the players in the ugly game being played out in the Lebanon?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:55 pm
old europe wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
My argument continues to be: the Israeli jews are not doing the samething to Israeli arabs as they are doing to the non-Israeli arabs. Why? Because the Israeli arabs are not attempting to mass murder Israeli jews. Idea


Right.

Then again, what about the Jews living in the West Bank - outside the Israeli settlements? This is a serious question, btw. If 17 percent of the population of the West Bank are Jewish - are they tolerated by the Palestinians?

I posted some links earlier, but it got all but ignored...

What specifically is your question about "the Jews living in the West Bank -outside the Israeli settlements?"
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 02:37:10