Reply
Sat 27 May, 2006 11:52 pm
1: Somebody had to go in to the water.
2: Nobody had to go into the water.
I want to know the difference between " go in to the water"
and "go into the water
Number one is a mis-print.
1: Somebody had to go in to the water.
It should be "into the water."
I wonder how into became two words?
It almost seems like "in to" makes legal grammer sence too. I'm tired of all the damn rules. Bukowski was right.
What you don't need is the "to" .
Someone can go in the water.
Someone can go into the water.
Same thing.
Yea, I geuss so.
But I still say I can make up my own grammer.
It's only a matter of getting a couple million people to recognize it.
True. And I see you are getting a good start at making up your own spelling as well.
Joe(I geuss)Nation
I have some learning disabilities, I have ADD, ADHD, ADDHDA, ADD+HD=OD and the new one ADHDABNCDHDWXYZ.