1
   

why did President need to testify under oath about it?

 
 
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:05 am
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 485 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:11 am
When a grand jury is empanelled to investigate an allegation of criminal activity, anyone, absolutely anyone can be subpoenaed. A subpoena is a legal writ requiring the recipient to appear and testify. That Clinton was the President did not make him immune from that responsibility.
0 Replies
 
ddlddlee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:22 am
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Setanta wrote:
When a grand jury is empanelled to investigate an allegation of criminal activity, anyone, absolutely anyone can be subpoenaed. A subpoena is a legal writ requiring the recipient to appear and testify. That Clinton was the President did not make him immune from that responsibility.
0 Replies
 
ddlddlee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:37 am
whether the marriage would survive or not
There is a sentence, " the jury was really out about whether the marriage would survive," I think whether the marriage would survive or not should be decided by Clinton and his wife, not by the jury, unless either of them asked the court to decide. So I am confused.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:40 am
The expression "the jury is out" means that it has not yet been decided whether something is true or not--it is a metaphor. I understand that this would confuse you. However, the use of the term "jury" in the expression "the jury is out" is metaphorical, and not literal. However, it is also true in regard to this incident that Mr. Clinton had been served a subpoena to appear before a Grand Jury investigating an allegation of criminal activity. So, the use of the term "jury" in that expression did not refer to the Grand Jury. If i have not explained this to your satisfaction, please let me know, and i'll try to explain it again in a manner which will make it clear to you.
0 Replies
 
ddlddlee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 08:51 am
divorce or not
It seems that the passage does not mean that either of the couple wanted to divorce, he or she did not ask the court to decide it. There is no need for the jury to decide it. Is that right?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:04 am
Re: divorce or not
ddlddlee wrote:
It seems that the passage does not mean that either of the couple wanted to divorce, he or she did not ask the court to decide it. There is no need for the jury to decide it. Is that right?


The passage does not contain a conclusion about whether or not the couple wanted to divorce, which is why the idiomatic expression "the jury is out" was used--because it was not yet determined. The Grand Jury before which Mr. Clinton was subpoenaed to testify was not concerned with the issue of whether or not the Clintons should divorce. What i am trying to get across to you is that there was a Grand Jury before which Mr. Clinton was obliged to testify; the expression "the jury is out" is only a metaphor, and does not refer to an actual jury, does not refer to any court action, and does not refer to the Grand Jury which had subpoenaed Mr. Clinton to testify.
0 Replies
 
ddlddlee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:13 am
I got it. Thank you very much for your reply. You are so kind, helpful.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:19 am
Well, i hope it did help. It was very confusing for someone who is not familiar with that expression, and i would not have seen that myself if you had not asked your question.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 01:20 pm
ddlddlee wrote:
I got it. Thank you very much for your reply. You are so kind, helpful.

You're new around here, aren't you? Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » why did President need to testify under oath about it?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 07:06:10