I appreciate your input dlowan.
The pdf file was about doing some type of cardiac thing through tilting the pelvis. That's not really what we'd be doing it for.
The 2nd link is one of many out there discusing rolfing.
I have to agree if you had it done years and years ago, it would probably have been more painful....
apparantly, up until about 7 or so years ago, the rolfer didn't take as much time to ease into manipulating the connective tissue. Now, they will start superficially and work in.
My husband has alot of back, neck problems, and has to take muscle relaxants, which is really getting to be a problem. He's going to see his pain management doctor later in the week anyway, and is going to be talking to him. They've talked about ablating some nerves, but hell, that'll take away the pain, because the nerves will be dead, but that's not helping the main problem, and could make it worse maybe, because pain is an awful good indicator that you shouldn't be doing something.
When you're in pain 24/7, having some more for a while is more than worth it is it will help later, and long term.
You say you didn't feel ANY difference at all? May I ask why you had it done? The only thing I've read on the internet about anyone being displeased was someone who had constant pain, but every other method he tried didn't work either. Do you remember how experienced your rolfer was and so forth?
Anyone else care to share?
lord ellpus, I do think they provide you with a "safe" word, so feel free to investigate further, perhaps you could bring your own appliances.
btw - here's the link to the place I found the most info....
Rolf