Limbaugh arrested

Oh, I thought that you were in deep disagreement with other posters here using the word "arrested", period - that you thought they shouldn't have.

But I was wrong, then. OK. You had no problem with that, just wanted to make clear that the actual word "arrested" did not appear in those three individual links, even though they appeared in a host of others. Allright.

So you're acknowledging that he was arrested now, then?

nimh wrote:

Oh, I thought that you were in deep disagreement with other posters here using the word "arrested", period - that you thought they shouldn't have.

But I was wrong, then. OK. You had no problem with that, just wanted to make clear that the actual word "arrested" did not appear in those three individual links, even though they appeared in a host of others. Allright.

So you're acknowledging that he was arrested now, then?

I never said he wasnt,at least I dont think I did.
My original comment was dealing with the 3 links I posted.
But,it does seem that Newsweek magazine is saying he wasnt arrested.

But,if you want me to acknowledge that he was arrested,then I will do that.
HE WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does that make you feel better?

WhoodaThunk wrote:

Um-hmm. If you're in 7th grade.

Well, I graduated from that many years ago and went on to study for many, many more years.


Of course, you and your ilk consider that evidence of moral turpitude and general badness.


I wonder why that is?



Speaking of psychiatry, I have numerous theories about that.

Did you have anything of substance to add, or will you continue with your standard meaningless negativity and illogical diversions?


I await any signs of intelligence and meaningful commentary, and will respond if such should emerge.

I shall not hold my breath.

The childish pictures posted dont bother me...

My point was that the first 3 links that I posted did not use the word "arrested",nothing more.

Unfortunately, you have sucessfully ruined this thread ....

mysteryman wrote:

nimh wrote:

Oh, I thought that you were in deep disagreement with other posters here using the word "arrested", period - that you thought they shouldn't have.

But I was wrong, then. OK. You had no problem with that, just wanted to make clear that the actual word "arrested" did not appear in those three individual links, even though they appeared in a host of others. Allright.

So you're acknowledging that he was arrested now, then?

I never said he wasnt,at least I dont think I did.
My original comment was dealing with the 3 links I posted.
But,it does seem that Newsweek magazine is saying he wasnt arrested.

But,if you want me to acknowledge that he was arrested,then I will do that.
HE WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does that make you feel better?

wotta maroon (emphasis added)

But,if you want me to acknowledge that he was arrested,then I will do that.
HE WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does that make you feel better?

mysteryman wrote:

But,if you want me to acknowledge that he was arrested,then I will do that.
HE WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does that make you feel better?

Immensely. Now that wasnt so hard, was it?

nimh wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

But,if you want me to acknowledge that he was arrested,then I will do that.
HE WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does that make you feel better?

Immensely. Now that wasnt so hard, was it?

Well, it took 23 pages.... But then again, we're talking about mysterman!

dlowan wrote:

WhoodaThunk wrote:

Um-hmm. If you're in 7th grade.

Well, I graduated from that many years ago and went on to study for many, many more years.


Of course, you and your ilk consider that evidence of moral turpitude and general badness.


I wonder why that is?



Speaking of psychiatry, I have numerous theories about that.

Did you have anything of substance to add, or will you continue with your standard meaningless negativity and illogical diversions?


I await any signs of intelligence and meaningful commentary, and will respond if such should emerge.

I shall not hold my breath.

Sorry ... it's much too early for me to deal with your usual load of mean-ass glibness. Maybe later ... probably not.

What a mean-ass freak show ...

WhoodaThunk wrote:

If would be interesting to have a truly impartial 3rd party read this thread and act as an armchair psychiatrist. Is the right nitpicking by questioning the negative connotations of an actual cuff & stuff arrest? Does the left feel cheated by being deprived of its big game trophy due to his plea bargaining? Which side engages in namecalling first? Most frequently? Which side relies most heavily on invective and perjoratives?

Huh?


This "left" doesn't feel deprived of anything. Addicts are best treated not imprisoned and persecuted.

The only thing that makes this worth a pinch of **** is Limbaugh's appalling hypocrisy in denouncing addicts and calling for harsh punishment.


Does the right deny that this is wrong behaviour, to assert in an influential public position that people should be treated harshly, while doing what you condemn them for? This idiot presumably had some sort of influence over his listeners.....has he used this justly in this case?

Presumably, if the man had any ethical backbone he ought to be insisting on harsh punishment for himself...

The usual "clinton was bad" crap is not even relevant...unless you have evidence that clinton railed against extra marital sex and/or oral sex,