cjhsa wrote:I only watch CNN in airports. It's a chance to catch up on Bill's going's on.
What a bunch of horseshit.
I liked Setanta's post: Try reading!
I soooo agree with you, Set.
salon.com maybe? or perhaps some other liberal breeding ground. The propaganda has to come from somewhere.
Try The Times . . . you know, that newspaper in London? They have good, reliable reportage, and no one in their right mind can accuse them of being libruls . . .
The thing about you guys is that you cannot distinguish between wishful thinking and reality. Bush is the president, has all the powers of a US president, and will continue to be the president until the next one takes office on January 20, 2009.
Yeah, you guys . . . ya hear that, you guys ? ! ? ! ?
Setanta wrote:Yeah, you guys . . . ya hear that, you guys ? ! ? ! ?
Omg, what a trenchant disproof of my thesis!
ya know Brandon, Finn once contered a post of mine by critiquing the hat I wore. Interesting, yes?
Anon-Voter wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:The thing about you guys is that you cannot distinguish between wishful thinking and reality. Bush is the president, has all the powers of a US president, and will continue to be the president until the next one takes office on January 20, 2009.
Yea, unless something tragic happens ... like bombing Iran, then maybe we can get the sucker faster. Relagate him to something he is capable of, like jail time!
Anon
Sorry, how does bombing Iran qualify as an impeachable offense? I don't quite follow that.
I wasn't trying to disprove your "thesis"--a bit of snide puke which doesn't deserve the title "thesis." If you assert that it is a "thesis," then to whom do you refer when you are whining about "you guys?" Because your "thesis" cannot neither be proven nor disproven until you specify those to whom you refer. Even were you to name names, you'd then have the burden of proving your contention, and you offer not a shred of evidence, just your typical bile.
Call me when you actually do cobble together a "thesis."
dyslexia wrote:ya know Brandon, Finn once contered a post of mine by critiquing the hat I wore. Interesting, yes?
Not really. Another thing I might have criticized about some people is that they can't distiguish between making a wisecrack in response to someone's assertion and disproving it. How pathetic.
The illusive "they". Ooooh, scary...
He's already done the impeachable ... all we need is a change in congress to get the process going in a positive direction. I think if he's stupid enough to bomb Iran, we have a good chance of doing that! Then again, maybe his plane will crash on the way to California and we won't have to worry about him and go right to work on The Dick!
Anon
Setanta wrote:I wasn't trying to disprove your "thesis"--a bit of snide puke which doesn't deserve the title "thesis." If you assert that it is a "thesis," then to whom do you refer when you are whining about "you guys?" Because your "thesis" cannot neither be proven nor disproven until you specify those to whom you refer. Even were you to name names, you'd then have the burden of proving your contention, and you offer not a shred of evidence, just your typical bile.
Call me when you actually do cobble together a "thesis."
Claiming that an opponent's post is too far below you to respond to is just another way of losing the argument. My thesis was that the idea that Bush's presidency is effectively over was nothing more than a liberal wet dream. That's perfectly clear. You are, unfortunately, another victim of the mistaken belief that an insulting response to an assertion disproves it. It doesn't. What I said was perfectly correct, whether you like it or not.
some people say (I love it when Fox News does this) "Brandon is a retard" does anyone here contradict what some people say?
kickycan wrote:The illusive "they". Ooooh, scary...
An airtight logical disproof of my statement!
