0
   

Survey says: Atheists most distrusted minority

 
 
Krekel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 04:17 pm
Thanks, dude ... or dame.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 04:27 pm
Setanta-

Would you kindly explain what you mean in post No1941329.I'm always interested in where I have made an error.

I can hardly be expected to just take your word for it.
I don't see what you mean.As you know,I'm stupid,so I can't be expected to understand these things like you can.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 08:06 pm
Krekel wrote:
This could be satire, but when I read some of the crap christians actually believe about atheists ... I wasn't sure anymore.

http://blogger.xs4all.nl//images/blogger_xs4all_nl/foz/15507/r_atheistwarning.jpg


Omigod, that's funny......
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 09:10 pm
I think Krekel now has the best avatar ever. Crotchety old Mr Gruff...<giggle>
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 09:37 pm
It's true.
I talked to old Mr. McGruff when I was a child and look how I turned out!
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 09:42 pm
I attened a funeral mass today - I wasn't impressed. I haven't been to a single funeral which didn't have a religious mass.... interesting.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 09:51 pm
I'm sure my family will have a religious ceremony at my funeral. So what? If it makes them feel better, I don't mind. I won't know anything anyway.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 09:53 pm
Yeh.
Funerals are for those left behind.
If they happen to be religious then so be it.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 01:29 am
[quote="cyphercat"]I think Krekel now has the best avatar ever. Crotchety old Mr Gruff...<giggle>[/quote]I am green with envy, my avatar is blasé
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 04:20 am
The bus is late today isn't it?
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 10:40 am
fresco wrote:
Why should it be a surprise ?

Atheists do not identify with any religious group conformity therefore their behaviour may be deemed difficult to predict. "Trust" is wrapped up with "prediction".


I'm with fresco....american distrust of atheists is not a surprise. Right or wrong, a person's trustworthiness is largely associated with his or her adherence to religious edicts, not social. The fact that my neighbor never breaks the laws defined by society gives me little reason to trust him. To be trustworthy with my secrets, I need to feel that he will place my well-being over his own personal interests. He must be willing to give up some of his own self-interest to preserve my secrets.

Most religions emphasize personal trustworthiness and placing others above oneself. For example, those who claim to be Christians are associated with a very familiar moral code found in the Bible. Other religions also have well-known moral codes they adhere to. But what well-known moral code does an atheist associate himself with? I have no basis for comparison when evaluating whether to trust an atheist, hence my distrust.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 10:47 am
Quote:
But what well-known moral code does an atheist associate himself with?
Ethics
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 10:57 am
dyslexia wrote:
Quote:
But what well-known moral code does an atheist associate himself with?
Ethics


Ya durn tootin' we like fig newton.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 11:18 am
Thing is, isn't ethics partially based upon religious values?
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 11:52 am
Not if you're not religious they aren't. Most ethical codes are based on shared social norms.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:01 pm
username wrote:
Not if you're not religious they aren't. Most ethical codes are based on shared social norms.


And how exactly do you think these social norms came about? What influenced them? Why, religion, of course.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:05 pm
How far back do you want to go, though? Christianity, for example, is only 2,000 years old -- people were ethical and moral long before that.

I think you could as easily say that most religions are based on shared social norms. (Chicken or egg?)
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:21 pm
But there are no ethical codes which everyone universally associates with atheists...that's the problem.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:27 pm
no, actually the problem is religionists have no ethics.
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:38 pm
well, doesn't conspicuous consumption count as an ethic "God WANTS you to drive a Cadillac"
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 01:17:30