cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 01:50 pm
okie wrote (in desperation): "...who are idealistic wanting so desperately to believe that evil does not exist."

okie's gone off the deep end; claiming many of us challenging him "believe that evil does not exist."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 01:58 pm
Muslims in the US and Canada: http://www.islamfortoday.com/muslimstoday.htm#America
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:00 pm
Im sure that you so called liberals think you are making points in the Obama is the greatest contest by demeaning the intelligence of everyone who disagrees with your genius assaments of the political situation. But all your doing is driving a wedge between people who might eventually come to agree with you. When you talk down to everyone who disagrees with you, you make them angry. Stick with the facts and keep the your a stupid basta-d to yourselves. And by the way this attitude shows something about you and your ability to communicate.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:02 pm
okie wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
okie wrote:
Another interesting tidbit from the Pew site, the number of people according to a poll that either have alot or some confidence in Osama Bin Laden in some Islamic countries ranges from 2% in Lebanon to 60% in Jordan. Other countries in the poll include Turkey at 7%, Morocco at 26%, Indonesia at 35%, and Pakistan at 51%.

ci and cyclops would probably chalk up such concerns over such things merely demonizing a non-problem.


Well, can you think of anybody who is not pro Obama or pro Left who has challenged Muslim extremism or actively challenged Obama or any other pet leftwing sacred cow who has been praised or complimented or even not demonized in these threads--at least somebody who has been pretty active in in depth discussion of these issues? Even those who aren't taking snotty shots smile approvingly or shout out their equivalents of 'right on' as all toadys do.

We must be hitting some pretty raw nerves, you think?


Foxfyre, I think it is a matter of people who are idealistic wanting so desperately to believe that evil does not exist. Confronting something that is wrong takes gumption and it takes work. They would rather pretend the problems do not exist. Also, if you have a moral system of gray areas, it just isn't politically correct to condemn anything or anybody, perhaps even Osama Bin Laden is a nice guy, at least he deserves a trial under our civilian justice system, right?


Okay, I was snotty and you said it better. But that is one of the lynch pins of liberalism--the belief in the inate goodness of human beings and any who see evil must in fact be the evil ones. I have never been able to figure out why it is more okay to condemn those who see evil, however, than it is to condemn those who do evil. But it's an interesting world.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:07 pm
rabel22 wrote:
Im sure that you so called liberals think you are making points in the Obama is the greatest contest by demeaning the intelligence of everyone who disagrees with your genius assaments of the political situation. But all your doing is driving a wedge between people who might eventually come to agree with you. When you talk down to everyone who disagrees with you, you make them angry. Stick with the facts and keep the your a stupid basta-d to yourselves. And by the way this attitude shows something about you and your ability to communicate.


rabel, You don't even know what you are talking about; I'm not a Obama supporter - at least not yet. Show me where I've supported Obama? When you don't know what you are talking about, it's better to stay quiet.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:10 pm
YOu're falling into the same "trap" as okie, making generalizations without the ability to back it up.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:10 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
When you don't know what you are talking about, it's better to stay quiet.


Advice you have failed to follow since starting here.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:11 pm
McGentrix wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
When you don't know what you are talking about, it's better to stay quiet.


Advice you have failed to follow since starting here.


In your case, most of us only consider the source and not the issues being addressed.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:24 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

Okay, I was snotty and you said it better. But that is one of the lynch pins of liberalism--the belief in the inate goodness of human beings and any who see evil must in fact be the evil ones. I have never been able to figure out why it is more okay to condemn those who see evil, however, than it is to condemn those who do evil. But it's an interesting world.

Don't worry, being snotty is a human failing I fall into as well. It is an interesting and fascinating phenomena that some leftists, I think, hate George Bush alot more than Osama Bin Laden. It is Bush that stands up for something called right and wrong, and that is a cardinal sin in a world of gray areas. Of course, Bin Laden also calls America evil, but I guess that doesn't bother them because of a twisted or strange phenomena that many leftists apparently have, which is a guilt complex over their own living in opulence. Condemning SUVs and CO2 is a more convenient way to assuage their consciences and gives them a sense of morality. Also, tax the rich and give it to the poor is another easy way.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 02:25 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
YOu're falling into the same "trap" as okie, making generalizations without the ability to back it up.

This all started with cyclops claiming Republicans as a group were carrying on a program of demonizing Muslim and Arab people. Talk about a generalization with no evidence, that one sure qualifies.
Here was the accusation:

Quote:
You are talking about the group who made it their mission to demonize Muslim and Arab people over the last several years.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:01 pm
It's not our problem that you fail to understand what "circumstantial evidence" is all about.

Your continued denial tells us enough.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:09 pm
I stand by that comment. There has been a pattern of intolerant words and attitudes towards Islaam and Muslims in general by the right-wing for some time now, and not just the right-wing in America, either...

From calls to nuke Mecca, to endless assertions that Islaam is a religion of violence, to calls to search Muslims at the airport, to limiting their ability to immigrate to America, to harassing Muslim members of Congress. Comments that we have 'too many mosques' in America. Pretty much every column by the likes of Coulter or radio show by Savage and from time to time Rush himself. The right-wing has not been friendly to the arab community over the last several years.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:13 pm
It doesn't mean a lot for the elections, but ...

... from the Pew report Global Economic Gloom Released: 06.12.08

Quote:
Favorable views of the United States have increased modestly since 2007 in 10 of 21 countries where comparative data are available. Perhaps more importantly, the polling finds many people around the world paying close attention to the U.S. presidential election. Moreover - except in countries that are extremely anti-American - those who are paying attention generally believe the next president may well change U.S. foreign policy for the better. In nearly every country surveyed, greater numbers express confidence in presidential candidate Barack Obama than in John McCain.


http://i25.tinypic.com/htv6s5.jpg
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:16 pm
Wow, Pakistan and Turkey really aren't big on the US at the moment...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:29 pm
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:30 pm
okie wrote:
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?


Demonizing. One of the best ways to get people to hate you even worse, is to treat them as if they deserve suspicion and hate.

You gotta be a friend, to make friends...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:33 pm
okie wrote:
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?


Why do you think, okie, that "those who are paying attention generally believe the next president may well change U.S. foreign policy for the better" express which such opinion their desire to immigrate to the USA?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:34 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
okie wrote:
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?


Demonizing. One of the best ways to get people to hate you even worse, is to treat them as if they deserve suspicion and hate.

You gotta be a friend, to make friends...

Cycloptichorn[/quo


physician heal thyself Laughing
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:38 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
okie wrote:
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?


Demonizing. One of the best ways to get people to hate you even worse, is to treat them as if they deserve suspicion and hate.

You gotta be a friend, to make friends...

Cycloptichorn



physician heal thyself Laughing


Are you interested in that sort of thing?

Others in similar situations have shown interest, but there have been several who have not. I suppose I had you lumped in that group.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Thu 12 Jun, 2008 03:47 pm
okie wrote:
You just now wake up to that, cyclops? So do you think we need millions of immigrants from Turkey and Pakistan, and if people are flying here from there, do you think they might deserve more scrutiny, or is that demonizing them?



People deserve more scrutiny if they hold unfavorable views of the United States and US policy?

Interesting idea, okie.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 924
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/06/2025 at 12:41:56