snood
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:03 am
mysteryman wrote:
FWIW,
Obama will be at Roberts stadium in Evansville In tonite, starting at 7:30 central time.
He will be preceeded by a free John Mellencamp concert.
I will be going to hear Obama tonite and will let you know what I think of what he says tomorrow.

If anyone wants to hear what he says, it will be carried live here...http://www.14wfie.com/

I went and saw Hillary when she was here, and I hope to go see McCain when and if he comes to this area.


Are your opinions of the three still in the formative stages?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:12 am
snood wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
FWIW,
Obama will be at Roberts stadium in Evansville In tonite, starting at 7:30 central time.
He will be preceeded by a free John Mellencamp concert.
I will be going to hear Obama tonite and will let you know what I think of what he says tomorrow.

If anyone wants to hear what he says, it will be carried live here...http://www.14wfie.com/

I went and saw Hillary when she was here, and I hope to go see McCain when and if he comes to this area.


Are your opinions of the three still in the formative stages?


In a sense, yes they are.
I prefer to hear from the candidates themselves and not soundbites or their own spin doctors.

In that regard, while Hillary did say some good things when she was in Evansville, I have decided that I cannot support her, and would vote against her if she were to win the dem nomination.

While I have not (so far) committed to either McCain or Obama, I have not ruled either of them out yet.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:26 am
I'm interested in your take. I've never heard any of the three speak other than sound bites on TV or radio. I did hear Clinton giving a long interview on NPR right before Texas and Obama yesterday. I'm sure it's different with a crowd dynamic added in.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:28 am
Out of curiosity, MM, what was it that you personally saw and heard at the live Clinton event that turned you away from voting for her?

Also, what did you hear or see at the live event that you haven't already heard or seen via videos and news accounts of her events in the media?

I'm just trying to figure out what was different for you about the Live event you personally attended and transcripts and videos of similar live events you didn't personally attend. Does it have to do with being emmersed in the crowd's reaction to what is going on there, viewing the live interaction of the speaker with the audience, or is it something else?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:29 am
Foxfyre wrote:
revel wrote:
Quote:
(Actually it must be her huisband's fair share as she couldn't possibly be adding anything much to the business as she spends all her time here)
Very Happy

Foxfrye; generally sometime down the road claims some kind of personal important function or role or closely related person or knows people...in every single debate as though it gives her some kind of edge over the other person. It is just a given.


Yes Revel, when you have lived as long as I have you too will likely have quite a store of personal experience to inform you. And that experience is broadened if you are fortunate enough to have had as many vocations and avocations as I have been blessed to have and to have lived in as many different places as I have lived and have been privileged to travel as much as I have traveled and been privileged to meet as many really great people as I have met. Very few have been especially important or particularly famous, but all have informed my point of view of the world.

And if you are similarly blessed, somewhere along the line you might learn to understand that everybody isn't like you and you learn to appreciate that people have different experiences from your own and you become quite a bit less personally judgmental.

I pray for you to have similar blessings.

I ask for your forgiveness for using personal experience that I find useful to explain my point of view and suggest that you just pass over my posts to avoid such irritation in the future.



I will pray for you. If you consider your shitty, arrogant, white supremacist view of the world to be a blessing...well... there aren't words for it...really...you are so typical of what the Buddha teaches about clinging to "things" only leads to dukkha (loosely translated = suffering)

You are obviously a very miserable person. You constantly try to convince the board how much better you are than the rest of us. I truly can only pity you. I have less in material things than I have ever had but I am happier than I have ever been as I can devote myself to my work and all my basic needs are taken care of. Clinging to material things does not bring happiness, it only creates craving for more and more.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:31 am
According to the MSM, the disappearing gun culture shouldn't really be a factor in this election.

So why are Obama and Clinton pandering for my vote (which they aren't gonna get)?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:36 am
cjhsa wrote:
According to the MSM, the disappearing gun culture shouldn't really be a factor in this election.

So why are Obama and Clinton pandering for my vote (which they aren't gonna get)?


It's just collateral damage, cjhsa. They aren't targeting you. :wink:
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:37 am
Butrflynet wrote:
Out of curiosity, MM, what was it that you personally saw and heard at the live Clinton event that turned you away from voting for her?

Also, what did you hear or see at the live event that you haven't already heard or seen via videos and news accounts of her events in the media?

I'm just trying to figure out what was different for you about the Live event you personally attended and transcripts and videos of similar live events you didn't personally attend. Does it have to do with being emmersed in the crowd's reaction to what is going on there, viewing the live interaction of the speaker with the audience, or is it something else?


I saw and heard quite a bit more when I went to her event that I hadnt seen or heard in the media.
In person, you hear everything the candidate is saying, not just what the media or the candidates own spin doctors want you to hear.
And regarding written transcripts, they dont allow you to see HOW a candidate is saying something, you only see WHAT that candidate said.

Her interaction with the audience was fantastic.
She had the crowd, 90% or more were her supporters to begin with, enthralled.
But to me, there were to many times when she seemed to be trying to say 2 different things at the same time, or she seemed like she was actually having to force some of her words out, like she didnt believe them herself.

Of course, that is just my opinion, but that goes back to HOW a candidate is saying something.

As for my personal reaction, I had the chance to meet her after the event when she came into the "overflow room", where about 300 people were waiting.
She was a very personable woman, and I imagine that if she wasnt running for office that she could be popular with everyone that meets her.

I dont know if that answers the question, but its really difficult to put into words the sort of "gut reaction" I had after her event in Evansville.
0 Replies
 
Vietnamnurse
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:38 am
cjhsa....no one is going to take away your guns, honey...don't know why but all candidates do that particularly in places like PA, KY, TN, WVA. It is stupid.

How is your kitty? I haven't been back to see my friend Olga for awhile.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:47 am
I'll be interested in your take, too, MM. Like you I've never seen the candidates in person and have relied on reading transcripts of them. I wonder if I might feel differently about them having seen them in person. You might be onto something there.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:56 am
mysteryman wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Out of curiosity, MM, what was it that you personally saw and heard at the live Clinton event that turned you away from voting for her?

Also, what did you hear or see at the live event that you haven't already heard or seen via videos and news accounts of her events in the media?

I'm just trying to figure out what was different for you about the Live event you personally attended and transcripts and videos of similar live events you didn't personally attend. Does it have to do with being emmersed in the crowd's reaction to what is going on there, viewing the live interaction of the speaker with the audience, or is it something else?


I saw and heard quite a bit more when I went to her event that I hadnt seen or heard in the media.
In person, you hear everything the candidate is saying, not just what the media or the candidates own spin doctors want you to hear.
And regarding written transcripts, they dont allow you to see HOW a candidate is saying something, you only see WHAT that candidate said.

Her interaction with the audience was fantastic.
She had the crowd, 90% or more were her supporters to begin with, enthralled.
But to me, there were to many times when she seemed to be trying to say 2 different things at the same time, or she seemed like she was actually having to force some of her words out, like she didnt believe them herself.

Of course, that is just my opinion, but that goes back to HOW a candidate is saying something.

As for my personal reaction, I had the chance to meet her after the event when she came into the "overflow room", where about 300 people were waiting.
She was a very personable woman, and I imagine that if she wasnt running for office that she could be popular with everyone that meets her.

I dont know if that answers the question, but its really difficult to put into words the sort of "gut reaction" I had after her event in Evansville.


I understand what you're saying. I hope you get an opportunity to meet Obama too. I have a difficult time putting into words my own "gut reaction" after hearing Obama at several live events.

You're right about the loss of authenticity when the event is replayed in video or a transcript. A good example of that is the speech where Obama was having a great time interacting, reacting and laughing with the crowd the day after the debate and the bonding moment he had with them when he made the dusting off the shoulder gesture. Watching the video of it was great, but I wished I could see the view of the crowd too to see what it was he was reacting to. All we got to see was his reaction and not what drew his attention.

How big of a crowd capacity does the venue have there where you'll be going? Hopefully it will be one of the smaller ones.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 12:06 pm
I just realized you'll be seeing him tonight, MM. You'll have a lot different experience than the usual Obama event I think. He'll be reacting to today's Pennsylvania election results and speaking more to the media for the usual victory/concession soundbite than to the local crowd, I think. Depending on the outcome, you might experience him trying to cheer up a crowd after a let down or enjoying a wildly celebratory jubilance.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 12:16 pm
Butrflynet,

Roberts stadium has a capacity of about 10,000 people, but with John Mellencamp playing before the Obama speech tonite (he is part of the event) I imagine there will be alot more people there then that.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 01:08 pm
Remind me not to vote for Mellencamp if he ever runs for office.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 01:23 pm
Hey MM, I'm glad you'll get to see Obama. Definitely interested in your reaction, too.

Btw it was taken as a tacit endorsement (and a possible clue to where Edwards was leaning) but now it turns out that Mellencamp is going to be playing at a Hillary event on Saturday. Ah well.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 01:34 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:

I will pray for you. If you consider your shitty, arrogant, white supremacist view of the world to be a blessing...well... there aren't words for it...really...you are so typical of what the Buddha teaches about clinging to "things" only leads to dukkha (loosely translated = suffering)

You are obviously a very miserable person. You constantly try to convince the board how much better you are than the rest of us. I truly can only pity you. I have less in material things than I have ever had but I am happier than I have ever been as I can devote myself to my work and all my basic needs are taken care of. Clinging to material things does not bring happiness, it only creates craving for more and more.


Interesting point about the Buddhist view of materialism.

I believe there is an analogous truth about our reactions to those we encounter in life. The inclination and disposition to find what is good in those we meet probably is indicative of, and contributes to, one's inner peace and contentment. Conversely, a primary focus on what is seen to be hateful or merely disagreeable in others probably indicates, and contributes to, the opposite.

It might be useful for you to consider what might be the causes and consequences of the all-too-frequent and rather bitter judgements of the characters of those who disagree with you , to which you are so inclined - as above.

You might be better off if you did it less.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 01:39 pm
It's his own fault. Roxxx chopeed off his nuts and now he's neonuts.
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 01:47 pm
I seriously doubt that Rox has the slightest idea regarding what Buddhism is about. If anyone is interested in Buddhism through liberal eyes, read any of the many excellent postings by JLNobody.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 02:25 pm
Clinton Gets Unexpected Endorsement

Quote:
PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- Hillary Rodham Clinton may not have been banking on this endorsement.

The Democratic presidential hopeful has been endorsed by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, whose owner and publisher -- billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife -- personally funded many of the investigations that led to President Clinton's impeachment.

Scaife spent $2.3 million to fund a series of articles that dug into Bill Clinton's behavior as governor of Arkansas.

Hillary Clinton famously defended her husband at the time, saying the allegations were part of a "vast right-wing conspiracy."

Now Scaife's paper says Clinton is "far more experienced in government" than Barack Obama, and has a "real voting record."

The endorsement is one of a handful Clinton has received from Pennsylvania newspapers ahead of next Tuesday's primary.


I tell ya, it is getting harder to see the difference between the two (McCain and Hillary). By the time the election rolls around if she gets it she will be a republican.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Tue 22 Apr, 2008 02:54 pm
Speaking of endorsements ... there was an interview with Michael Moore on CBC's As It Happens last night.

(I was looking for a place to pop the link as I thought it was a good interview)

Quote:
MICHAEL MOORE Duration: 00:07:32

On Wednesday, Michael Moore will turn fifty-four years old. But today, on the eve of the Pennsylvania primary, the out-spoken filmmaker revealed what he wants for his birthday: Barack Obama.


We reached Michael Moore in Central Lake, Michigan.


The interview wasn't what I expected, not that I'm entirely sure what I expected - maybe that he'd be louder?

The podcast is available through Latest Show

(I'm still looking for a transcript)

~~~

The Tony Snow/Dee Dee Myers non-debate on Larry King last night was kind of annoying. Maybe it was because Tony's rejoined CNN, but sheesh, it was a bit icky sweet.

down toward the bottom third of the transcript

Quote:
MYERS: Well, you know, I think that that's -- we'd like to be able to look in the crystal ball and answer that question, as Democrats with the primary contests still going on. I don't think there's an easy answer to that question. If there were, we would have resolved this a long time ago. There are those who think Hillary Clinton's experience as a campaigner, having been through a general election, is certainly something that prepares you to be in a general election. She wasn't the candidate, but she's been through it at a much more close level than Senator Obama.

On the other hand, Senator Obama is fresh. He brings a lot of enthusiasm. He has a tremendously enthusiastic base of support that's going to stand by him and drive up turnout in ways we haven't seen in previous elections. So both of them I think have strong arguments for why they'd be the better nominee. The bottom line is the important thing is to win in November and I think either candidate has a great opportunity to do that.

KING: Tony, how do you see November?

SNOW: Well, the way -- Look, I think McCain's going to win, actually, because I think security and the economy both break his way. But on the Democratic side, if you take a look at it, it's basically -- Dee Dee got this right. You have got this charisma and emotion on the part of Obama. Can people stay in love with him from now until November? If so, it makes him a stronger candidates. If, on the other hand, the more you learn about him, the more you fall out of love, that's a campaign that could collapse.

Meanwhile, with Hillary Clinton, you have somebody who is battle tested. You have a political machine. You have a lot of experience. And you're going to have the ability to do whatever it takes to try to pull the party together. If you need that kind of machine operation, I think she does better.


we all love everybody
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 778
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.21 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 12:36:23