Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:04 am
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/politics-1/120786565846870.xml&storylist=newsmichigan

Quote:
Obama's embattled ex-minister to speak at NAACP Detroit dinner
4/10/2008, 7:13 p.m. EDT
By JEFF KAROUB
The Associated Press

DETROIT (AP) ?- Calling him a man that has "challenged the nation" and "challenged our comfort zone," the Detroit branch of the NAACP announced Thursday it had selected the embattled Rev. Jeremiah Wright as keynote speaker for its 53rd Annual Fight for Freedom Fund dinner.

The former minister of Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama will address the civil rights organization at the April 27 event, whose past speakers have included Obama, Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton.

Wright has been criticized for inflammatory remarks about everything from race relations to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. He recently announced his retirement from Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ.

Obama has denounced the most inflammatory of Wright's comments, but says he shouldn't be judged solely on a handful of remarks. Obama expressed admiration and support for the pastor who officiated at his wedding, baptized his two daughters and inspired the title of his best-selling book, "The Audacity of Hope."

A fax was sent Thursday afternoon seeking comment from Wright by The Associated Press at the direction of Rev. Joan Harrell, Trinity's minister of communications.

In response to the controversy generated by Wright's remarks, leaders of the national United Church of Christ and the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA have called for a nationwide "sacred conversation" about race. United Church of Christ leaders also have asked ministers in the church's 5,700 congregations, seminaries and other ministry settings to preach about race on May 18.

"Wright has challenged the nation, challenged our comfort zone and stimulated nationwide discussion on the issues of how we must move forward together as both a nation and a people," The NAACP chapter said in its announcement.

It's that spirit that spurred the Detroit's National Association for the Advancement of Colored People branch to select Wright to speak at the dinner that draws about 10,000 people.

The Rev. Wendell Anthony, the NAACP Detroit branch's president, called Wright an accomplished lecturer and religious leader whose appearance offered "an opportunity for us all to go to school, to learn what goes on within our communities that we may not understand."

Most Americans know Wright only from video excerpts of sermons in which he says God should damn the United States for its racism, accuses the government of spreading AIDS and suggests the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were retribution for the country's past wrongs.

In a speech last month that took the country's racial divide head-on, Obama ?- the son of a white woman from Kansas and a Kenyan father ?- said black anger persists over injustice in America, and whites shouldn't be surprised about the way it's expressed in sermons.

Anthony said Wright should not be judged by a 30-second sound bite but by the full thrust, content and context of his remarks. The Detroit address "will give people an opportunity for people to hear him for themselves," he said.

0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 01:00 am
Butrflynet wrote:
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/politics-1/120786565846870.xml&storylist=newsmichigan

Quote:
Obama's embattled ex-minister to speak at NAACP Detroit dinner
4/10/2008, 7:13 p.m. EDT
By JEFF KAROUB
The Associated Press

DETROIT (AP) ?- Calling him a man that has "challenged the nation" and "challenged our comfort zone," ......

Challenged the nation? Challenged our comfort zone? With what, profanities and hatred? Btrfly, you can't seriously believe any of this spin?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 05:32 am
Grover Norquist said:
Quote:
"I spend a lot of time working with the conservative press to make sure that we're all thinking alike and talking alike."


Okie said:
Quote:
but essentially I agree 100% with Hannity


Can you ferret out the connection here, okie?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:19 am
blatham, put on your thinking cap for a change. If you would care to listen, I could tell you a few things with which I disagree with any one of a host of conservative pundits and radio personalities. You can pick one if you want? You need to graduate beyond something beyond this elementary to understand, blatham. Conservatives all have a very tough time agreeing on everything, and if you can't see this, you are still at square 1. And as far as politicians, take the Republican field that we had, I did not agree with any of them on everything, but a couple or so were not too far off. Even McCain, with which I disagreed with alot, he is still far better than any Democrat, and so I will likely vote for him.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:22 am
blatham wrote:
Grover Norquist said:
Quote:
"I spend a lot of time working with the conservative press to make sure that we're all thinking alike and talking alike."


Okie said:
Quote:
but essentially I agree 100% with Hannity


Can you ferret out the connection here, okie?


I can't, please help with the connection Blatham.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:24 am
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.
0 Replies
 
Kitten with a Whip
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:24 am
okie wrote:
blatham, put on your thinking cap for a change. If you would care to listen, I could tell you a few things with which I disagree with any one of a host of conservative pundits and radio personalities. You can pick one if you want? You need to graduate beyond something beyond this elementary to understand, blatham. Conservatives all have a very tough time agreeing on everything, and if you can't see this, you are still at square 1. And as far as politicians, take the Republican field that we had, I did not agree with any of them on everything, but a couple or so were not too far off. Even McCain, with which I disagreed with alot, he is still far better than any Democrat, and so I will likely vote for him.



But generally speaking, you guys see everything in black and white. That is why you are so mistaken in your view of the world. And why a liberal version of Fox News, Hannity, Neal Bortz or Rush Limbaugh will never work.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:27 am
Not everything in black and white, but we do see some things, such as right and wrong more clearly on many issues. We do believe in principles that are lasting and sound, that we do not wish to compromise on. You are correct on that, and I am glad of it. Building a foundation on shifting sand is not my idea of a lasting structure.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:31 am
okie wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/index.ssf?/base/politics-1/120786565846870.xml&storylist=newsmichigan

Quote:
Obama's embattled ex-minister to speak at NAACP Detroit dinner
4/10/2008, 7:13 p.m. EDT
By JEFF KAROUB
The Associated Press

DETROIT (AP) ?- Calling him a man that has "challenged the nation" and "challenged our comfort zone," ......

Challenged the nation? Challenged our comfort zone? With what, profanities and hatred? Btrfly, you can't seriously believe any of this spin?


Seeing as you haven't actually listened to or read anything he's said, how do you feel qualified to say this?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:34 am
okie wrote:
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.


Of course. Because all conservatives are good and true, and all liberals are evil demons from hell, sent to earth by Satan to destroy us all.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:40 am
kickycan wrote:
okie wrote:
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.


Of course. Because all conservatives are good and true, and all liberals are evil demons from hell, sent to earth by Satan to destroy us all.


I knew I wasn't the only one that thought that way! *whew*
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:43 am
McGentrix wrote:
kickycan wrote:
okie wrote:
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.


Of course. Because all conservatives are good and true, and all liberals are evil demons from hell, sent to earth by Satan to destroy us all.


I knew I wasn't the only one that thought that way! *whew*


May I add an emphatic HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 11:47 am
Get help.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:36 pm
kickycan wrote:
okie wrote:
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.


Of course. Because all conservatives are good and true, and all liberals are evil demons from hell, sent to earth by Satan to destroy us all.

Is that sort of like all rich white people run this country, the government gives people drugs, the government started the aids virus, and Jews are responsible for mayhem all over, is that what you mean, kicky? Or is it Hannity that is guilty of "smearing" for mentioning the above? I guess Wright was correct, not Hannity? So do you perhaps think that perhaps Hannity is the demon from hell instead?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:38 pm
okie wrote:
kickycan wrote:
okie wrote:
Blatham is still trying to pull a fast one here, and take my statement out of context and twist it. But this is par for the course.


Of course. Because all conservatives are good and true, and all liberals are evil demons from hell, sent to earth by Satan to destroy us all.

Is that sort of like all rich white people run this country, the government gives people drugs, the government started the aids virus, and Jews are responsible for mayhem all over, is that what you mean, kicky? Or is it Hannity that is guilty of "smearing" for mentioning the above? I guess Wright was correct, not Hannity? So I guess you agree with blatham that Hannity is the demon from hell?


I might respond to this if I had any idea what the hell any of it has to do with the fact that you see all liberals as evil demons from hell.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:39 pm
kickycan wrote:
you see all liberals as evil demons from hell.


You make that sound like a bad thing.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:40 pm
kicky, I would suggest you go back and read the exchange between blatham and I in regard to Hannity. That would be a good place to start if you want to understand this.

And you are the one that brought up the liberals are all evil demons from hell. Are you suffering from some kind of complex?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 12:53 pm
No. You are. I wish I could help you, poor boy.
0 Replies
 
Gargamel
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 01:13 pm
McGentrix wrote:
kickycan wrote:
you see all liberals as evil demons from hell.


You make that sound like a bad thing.


Congratulations, you've won the annoying contest!
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Fri 11 Apr, 2008 01:55 pm
Gargamel wrote:
Congratulations, you've won the annoying contest!


The contest was rigged.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 747
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 03/13/2026 at 05:16:14