Roxxxanne wrote:
See, you can't even grasp the concept because you don't understand nuance. How anyone can watch that video and say "I agree with Hannity 100%" is to me incomprehensible. But you guys don't have the same ability to see all the nuances and grey areas inherent in how anyonefeels about anything. The way I see things is only relative to my own perceptions.
No one can possibly see things the way I see them and no one can communicate ideas about how they perceive things to convey to me enough information that I could ever be confident in agreeing with them 100%. When someone says they agree with someone 100% it reveals that they lack critical thinking skills.
I would agree with you that no one can possibly see things the way you see them, Roxi.
I went back again and watched blatham's linked video of Hannity and Colmes and Luntz. I confess, everything Hannity said, I essentially agreed with. I may have said the same thing slightly different if I had said it, but essentially I agree 100% with Hannity in his questions and analysis. Actually, most of what he said was in the form of a question, all appropriate. And most of his questions were not answered with a straight answer, but instead justifications and alibis.
I am still waiting for blatham to explain how Hannity was wrong or smeared anyone. And I don't expect one because there is none. Not a valid one.
)
