Obama '08?

cicerone imposter wrote:

nappyheadedhohoho wrote:

blueflame1 wrote:

ho, there's nothing anti-American about Obama's church. Except to a bigot with a purely political agenda. Your use of nappyheadedhohoho says everything about you. You love being a racist obviously.

flame, I'm just repeating what the Democrats on Taylor Marsh's website are saying about Obama's church (I chose the mildest criticism).

My nappy head is God given. As far as being a racist, I think just about anyone here who has voiced objections to Obama's pastor or his church has been labeled a racist. Big deal.

I left the Democratic party a long time ago, but the show that's being put on by them is fun to watch.

It's not about what Taylor said; it's about you who would continue to beat a dead horse that has no effect on the outcome of this election. It has to do with what Wright said, and not about Obama; the obvious issue, but all is being taken out of "context" if you understand the meaning of the word. Only racists would continue to repeat them.

Then you need to address your concerns to Ms. Marsh. And to those who would vote for a liar, looks like you may get your chance. The following link found at Democrat Taylor Marsh's website:

Obama Laundry List of Lies

cicerone imposter wrote:

nappyheadedhohoho wrote:

blueflame1 wrote:

ho, there's nothing anti-American about Obama's church. Except to a bigot with a purely political agenda. Your use of nappyheadedhohoho says everything about you. You love being a racist obviously.

flame, I'm just repeating what the Democrats on Taylor Marsh's website are saying about Obama's church (I chose the mildest criticism).

My nappy head is God given. As far as being a racist, I think just about anyone here who has voiced objections to Obama's pastor or his church has been labeled a racist. Big deal.

I left the Democratic party a long time ago, but the show that's being put on by them is fun to watch.

It's not about what Taylor said; it's about you who would continue to beat a dead horse that has no effect on the outcome of this election. It has to do with what Wright said, and not about Obama; the obvious issue, but all is being taken out of "context" if you understand the meaning of the word. Only racists would continue to repeat them.

Then you need to address your concerns to Ms. Marsh. And to those who would vote for a liar, looks like you may get your chance. The following link found at Democrat Taylor Marsh's website:

Obama Laundry List of Lies

Not to worry, teenyboone, Taylor Marsh isn't above voting for a liar, either. Some of her commenters on the other hand....

revel wrote:

You know this is not true; most democracts were in favor of the last gulf war with the first bush;

If the votes of members of Congress are any indicator I'd have doubts about that claim.

When Gulf War I (1991) was building 45 out of 55 (82%) Democratic senators and 179 of 265 (66%) Democratic House members voted to oppose that war.

Compare that to the 21 of 49 (43%) Democratic Senators and 126 of 207 (61%) Democratic House members voted against the use of force in Iraq.

It would appear that more Democrats were against Gulf War I (1991) then were against the use of Force in Iraq (2002).

Public opinion polls from early January 1991 (just prior U.S. action) showed general public support for Gulf War I to be between 44 and 49% so I can't see how "most Democrats" could have considered to have been in favor of that war prior to it starting.

The Camelot connection has become part of the mythology surrounding Obama's bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Didn't want to derail nimh's thread about Republicans. This can become the equivalent about Democrats, but my initial question is: Would Obama work, after all?

Teenyboone; as just a friendly suggestion; there is another thread to discuss racial issues and such matters leaving this thread for the purpose it was intended.

Quote:

Didn't want to derail nimh's thread about Republicans. This can become the equivalent about Democrats, but my initial question is: Would Obama work, after all?

From Sozobe first post in this thread.

Listening to the clip of Jackson's speech, she was expressing exactly the kind of sentiments about America that several Obama supporters were aching to hear from him. And still haven't.

mysteryman wrote:

Butrflynet wrote:

What is the typical dem policy?

Attacking any repub policy, without bothering to see if its a good policy or not.

You know this is not true; most democracts were in favor of the last gulf war with the first bush; they were in favor of the war in Afghanistan. It was only the Iraq war that some democrats were not in favor with all along and we were right in everything we said and you guys were wrong in everything you said.

I am just not sure exactly what Ronald Reagan did to merit anything positive; maybe saying the words, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." But perhaps Obama meant Ronald Reagan was less of a knee jerk reactionay president than the one we have now and that is what we need to return to.

teenyboone wrote:

Roxxxanne wrote:

Quote:

Obama win appears big in Texas delegate battle
By Anna M. Tinsley, Aman Batheja and Sarah Bahari | Fort Worth Star-Telegam


Barrack Obama appeared to have scored a clear victory over Hillary Clinton on Saturday in the second step of Texas' multi-tiered process for selecting its delegates to the Democratic National Convention. With results available from about half of the district conventions held statewide, the Associated Press reported that Obama had won 59 percent of the delegates headed to the state party's June convention to Clinton's 41 percent. That translates into 1,858 delegates for Obama and 1,270 for Clinton.

That result made it likely that when the delegate selection process is finally completed, Obama will have more Texas delegates to the national convention than Clinton, despite Clinton's having won the March 4 primary vote 51 to 47 percent. Under Texas' delegate selection process, 67 of its 206 delegates are selected by the June state party convention.

Roxanne,
Hillary Clinton claims, she won, so is this a final count? I haven't heard anything on this in the news, yet.

The caucus vote isn't final but evryone is calling the caucus for Obama. Of course, Hillary's latest deception is that it's the popular vote that should count. Perhaps, when all else fails, Hillary will say that the winner should be whoever wins the states with the most letters!

Roxxxanne wrote:

teenyboone wrote:

Roxxxanne wrote:

Quote:

Obama win appears big in Texas delegate battle
By Anna M. Tinsley, Aman Batheja and Sarah Bahari | Fort Worth Star-Telegam


Barrack Obama appeared to have scored a clear victory over Hillary Clinton on Saturday in the second step of Texas' multi-tiered process for selecting its delegates to the Democratic National Convention. With results available from about half of the district conventions held statewide, the Associated Press reported that Obama had won 59 percent of the delegates headed to the state party's June convention to Clinton's 41 percent. That translates into 1,858 delegates for Obama and 1,270 for Clinton.

That result made it likely that when the delegate selection process is finally completed, Obama will have more Texas delegates to the national convention than Clinton, despite Clinton's having won the March 4 primary vote 51 to 47 percent. Under Texas' delegate selection process, 67 of its 206 delegates are selected by the June state party convention.

Roxanne,
Hillary Clinton claims, she won, so is this a final count? I haven't heard anything on this in the news, yet.

The caucus vote isn't final but evryone is calling the caucus for Obama. Of course, Hillary's latest deception is that it's the popular vote that should count. Perhaps, when all else fails, Hillary will say that the winner should be whoever wins the states with the most letters!

So now the popular vote shouldnt count????
I distinctly remember that during the 2000 AND the 2004 presidential elections you and other dems were crying that the popular vote SHOULD count, instead of the electoral vote.
Now, when Hillary wins the popular vote, you say it doesnt matter.

So which is it, should the popular vote count or not?

teeny, the word racist seems to be loosely tossed around. But clearly the use of the name nappyheadedhohoho is a racist taunt.