Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 12:42 pm
It's okay C.I. I fully accept that you think it is just fine and dandy when "God D*mn America" and the USAofKKK and many other totally unsubstantiated accusations are preached from the pulpit and condoned by the congregation.

I rather doubt that my objection to that us untypical however, no matter how much you wish to express that it is.

As far as gay bashing, etc. expressed by Cyclop, I suppose there are some fundamentalist churches where that does happen. I can truthfully say that I have never EVER heard that from any church I have attended as a member, however. And my denomination is pretty darn mainstream and is probably typical of most mainstream churches in that regard.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 12:44 pm
Democrats' situation has deteriorated beyond spin
Jennifer Rubin, Commentary Magazine

The ABC This Week's roundtable (running the political gamut from George Will to Donna Brazile) was unanimous on several points: Reverend Wright is a significant problem for Barack Obama, the Democrats are in a bloody war (Brazile says so bloody not even "bleach" can remove it) and Hillary Clinton's chances for the nomination rest on her ability to demonstrate that Obama is unelectable in the general election. All of this is complicated, they reminded us, by rules crafted so oddly as to prevent a decisive winner. As George Will put it, the Democrats have gone from "an embarrassment of riches to an embarrassment."

Many conservatives may be concerned that somehow the liberal media will sweep the last couple of days' events under the rug and Obama will sail on. As exemplified by the ABC panel, I see no substantial risk of this happening. Once Americans saw and heard Wright's remarks, we went beyond the ability of even the most dogged partisans in the media to spin it in a way that would extract their favored candidate from the predicament he is in.

This is not an extraneous point of policy or something beyond the ability of average people to assess. Millions of voters go to church and synagogue and don't hear this sort of venomous talk, and would leave if they did. Everyone can ask themselves: If he went to Wright's church for 20 years, how likely is it that he heard this stuff, and what does his continued attendance say about him? It simply isn't possible to wish it all away and hope voters don't notice.


http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/2970
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 12:55 pm
I can not speak for everybody but for me it is a simple matter of accepting Obama's disavowal of Wright's racial/anti-American words.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 12:57 pm
Quote:
Reverend Wright is a significant problem for Barack Obama, the Democrats are in a bloody war (Brazile says so bloody not even "bleach" can remove it)...


This is the best Democratic primary ever!
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 01:08 pm
revel wrote:
I can not speak for everybody but for me it is a simple matter of accepting Obama's disavowal of Wright's racial/anti-American words.


I would agree if he had not so glowing bragged on his church until it became a political liability, until he claimed he had never heard Pastor Wright's more objectionable rhetoric, and until he just now disavowed it when it became obvious that it was a problem for him.

That is his problem. Not the Rev. Wright per se.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 01:36 pm
Obama plans major race speech tomorrow

Barack Obama will give a major speech on "the larger issue of race in this campaign," he told reporters in Monaca, PA just now.

He was pressed there, as he has been at recent appearances, on statements by his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

"I am going to be talking about not just Reverend Wright, but the larger issue of race in this campaign," he said.

He added that he would "talk about how some of these issues are perceived from within the black church issue for example," he said.

He also briefly defended Wright from the image that has come through in a handful of repeatedly televised clips from recent Wright sermons.

"The caricature that's being painted of him is not accurate," he said.

The speech could offer Obama an opportunity to move past the controversy over his pastor, and to turn the conversation to a topic he'd rather focus on: his Christian faith. But the speech also guarantees that the Wright story will continue to dominate political headlines.

Mitt Romney's attempt directly to address his Mormonism last year never decisively put the issue to rest for some voters.

Obama's schedule puts him in Philadelphia tomorrow.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Obama_plans_major_race_speech_tomorrow.html

(Wow... over 500 comments regarding this in a couple of hours)
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 01:52 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
revel wrote:
I can not speak for everybody but for me it is a simple matter of accepting Obama's disavowal of Wright's racial/anti-American words.


I would agree if he had not so glowing bragged on his church until it became a political liability, until he claimed he had never heard Pastor Wright's more objectionable rhetoric, and until he just now disavowed it when it became obvious that it was a problem for him.

That is his problem. Not the Rev. Wright per se.


Why bring it up publically before it became an issue publically? He heard about at it at the start of his compaign for president but didnt' quit his church because the Pastor was going to retire anyway by the time he heard about it and at that time he made it clear he disagreed with him about it. He hasn't quit his church yet and he hasn't completely wrote off Wright but has said he disagrees with his remarks now and at the time he first heard about it.

Quote:
Because these particular statements by Rev. Wright are so contrary to my own life and beliefs, a number of people have legitimately raised questions about the nature of my relationship with Rev. Wright and my membership in the church. Let me therefore provide some context.

As I have written about in my books, I first joined Trinity United Church of Christ nearly twenty years ago. I knew Rev. Wright as someone who served this nation with honor as a United States Marine, as a respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago. He also led a diverse congregation that was and still is a pillar of the South Side and the entire city of Chicago. It's a congregation that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.

Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church.

Let me repeat what I've said earlier. All of the statements that have been the subject of controversy are ones that I vehemently condemn. They in no way reflect my attitudes and directly contradict my profound love for this country.

With Rev. Wright's retirement and the ascension of my new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss, III, Michelle and I look forward to continuing a relationship with a church that has done so much good. And while Rev. Wright's statements have pained and angered me, I believe that Americans will judge me not on the basis of what someone else said, but on the basis of who I am and what I believe in; on my values, judgment and experience to be President of the United States.


source


I believe Obama's explanation and see no problems for Obama on this issue. I don't know if his honest explanation will be enough to make this go away; but that will not not change my satisfaction with his explanation if it does not.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:09 pm
The problem is that many, including many Democrats, don't see it as an 'honest explanation'. Remember Obama is on the record that he wasn't there during any of (I think) 17 sermons now being circulated on the internet and he is on the record that he was unaware of any controversy re Rev Wright until recently. From Rev. Wright's own words in an interview with MSNBC some months ago, we know that Obama's claim isn't entirely true.

A Newsmax reporter, in the last 24 hours, has placed Obama at a July 22 sermon which is one of the more controversial sermons with the video being widely circulated on the internet. Obama says he couldn't have been there because 'he was giving a speech in Miami that day'.

Does anybody know whether July 22 was before or after the pledge not to campaign in Florida? I'm not sure of the time frame on that. Or maybe the July 22 sermon was in a previous year? I'm not sure about that either. Though it seems unlikely the reporter would have had any interest in this prior to this year.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:24 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Does anybody know whether July 22 was before or after the pledge not to campaign in Florida?


Obama was scheduled to address the national council of La Raza's annual conference on July 22, 2007, at 1:30 pm local time.

Newsmax:
Quote:
Clarification: The Obama campaign has told members of the press that Senator Obama was not in church on the day cited, July 22, because he had a speech he gave in Miami at 1:30 PM. Our writer, Jim Davis, says he attended several services at Senator Obama's church during the month of July, including July 22. The church holds services three times every Sunday at 7:30 and 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. Central time. While both the early morning and evening service allowed Sen. Obama to attend the service and still give a speech in Miami, Mr. Davis stands by his story that during one of the services he attended during the month of July, Senator Obama was present and sat through the sermon given by Rev. Wright as described in the story. Mr. Davis said Secret Service were also present in the church during Senator Obama's attendance. Mr. Davis' story was first published on Newsmax on August 9, 2007.


This clarification implies that the sermon in issue may have occurred on a Sunday in July 2007 before or after July 22.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:28 pm
So would addressing La Raza in Miami be campaigning? Again, does anybody know exactly when it was that Hillary and Obama signed the pledge not to campaign in Florida?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:30 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
The problem is that many, including many Democrats, don't see it as an 'honest explanation'. Remember Obama is on the record that he wasn't there during any of (I think) 17 sermons now being circulated on the internet and he is on the record that he was unaware of any controversy re Rev Wright until recently. From Rev. Wright's own words in an interview with MSNBC some months ago, we know that Obama's claim isn't entirely true.

A Newsmax reporter, in the last 24 hours, has placed Obama at a July 22 sermon which is one of the more controversial sermons with the video being widely circulated on the internet. Obama says he couldn't have been there because 'he was giving a speech in Miami that day'.

Does anybody know whether July 22 was before or after the pledge not to campaign in Florida? I'm not sure of the time frame on that. Or maybe the July 22 sermon was in a previous year? I'm not sure about that either. Though it seems unlikely the reporter would have had any interest in this prior to this year.


Many have been wrong before including democrats and now you are as well. Obama has not said he wasn't at any of these so called 17 sermons being circulated. I wasn't even aware there are 17 sermons being circulated, but take you at your word considering you are following it so closely.

What he said was those statements that are subject of controversy were not ones he heard sitting in the pews at trinity church nor ones he heard in private. I believe him; but your right; a lot of people are getting caught up in this and turning against him. At least that is what he said in the huffingpost and I believe him.

As far as all your slueths and newmax stories; I hope people take it with a grain of salt; but I have my doubts.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:35 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
So would addressing La Raza in Miami be campaigning? Again, does anybody know exactly when it was that Hillary and Obama signed the pledge not to campaign in Florida?


Not positive but I think September based on my googling results.

Let me ask you, Foxfyre. Do you believe that Obama shares the views and opinions that his pastor expressed in the videos in question?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:35 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Again, does anybody know exactly when it was that Hillary and Obama signed the pledge not to campaign in Florida?


September 1, 2007.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:54 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Sinbad is lying to protect his candidate and a fellow black man....

Right. And you really believe that they'd have sent Sheryl Crow and Sinbad there in the first place if there'd been sniper fire at the airport?

Hillary's fabulating.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:55 pm
Not to mention Chelsea.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 02:59 pm
I tell you I am just so disgusted at this latest turn of events backed by conservatives but not disavowed (used that word a lot today) by Hillary, that if Obama goes down because of this whole stupid Wright thing I am not voting for anybody. (not that my vote makes a lot of difference; just expressing my disgust for this whole thing.)
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 03:03 pm
[crossing my fingers] I hope Obama goes down because of this [/cross]

I don't think he will though.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 03:12 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
So would addressing La Raza in Miami be campaigning? Again, does anybody know exactly when it was that Hillary and Obama signed the pledge not to campaign in Florida?


Not positive but I think September based on my googling results.

Let me ask you, Foxfyre. Do you believe that Obama shares the views and opinions that his pastor expressed in the videos in question?


FD, I don't have a clue what is in Obama's heart or what views he shares other than what he says he believes, what he proposes, and what he shows to us via his vote/actions/words/writings. I think it would be the height of arrogance for me to speculate on his thoughts or his motives that are not supported by his votes, his words, his writings, etc.

I, however, think that it does stretch his credibility when he says on one hand that he was an active member of the church for 20 years and had a close relationship with the pastor and then on the other hand says that he didn't know his pastor's more inflammatory views until just recently. This is not calling him a liar because I can't know that. This is simply an observation that what he says is not credible. This is underscored when his pastor himself has reported that his opinions could be viewed as 'rough' and therefore it was decided to keep him out of sight early on in the campaign. It is further underscored when Obama says that had he heard all that, he wouldn't have stayed.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 03:24 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
So would addressing La Raza in Miami be campaigning? Again, does anybody know exactly when it was that Hillary and Obama signed the pledge not to campaign in Florida?


Not positive but I think September based on my googling results.

Let me ask you, Foxfyre. Do you believe that Obama shares the views and opinions that his pastor expressed in the videos in question?


FD, I don't have a clue what is in Obama's heart or what views he shares other than what he says he believes, what he proposes, and what he shows to us via his vote/actions/words/writings. I think it would be the height of arrogance for me to speculate on his thoughts or his motives that are not supported by his votes, his words, his writings, etc.

I, however, think that it does stretch his credibility when he says on one hand that he was an active member of the church for 20 years and had a close relationship with the pastor and then on the other hand says that he didn't know his pastor's more inflammatory views until just recently. This is not calling him a liar because I can't know that. This is simply an observation that what he says is not credible. This is underscored when his pastor himself has reported that his opinions could be viewed as 'rough' and therefore it was decided to keep him out of sight early on in the campaign. It is further underscored when Obama says that had he heard all that, he wouldn't have stayed.


Foxfyre...

How do you feel about McCain bowing down before the altar of John Hagee.

This is obviously a cynical ploy to win votes instead of a sincere act as a member in a faith based community.

I find McCain's act of hypocrisy to be far more troubling.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2008 03:30 pm
ebrown, a few pages back is a post of McCain's statements re Hagee and also his statement re Obama's relationship with his pastor. I suggest you visit that and you will know what I think.

Whoops, nope, it was on the Conservatism thread HERE
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 622
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 09:46:15