Obama '08?

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Josh Marshall has a blog outside of TPM??@!!

Link plz!!

Cycloptichorn

No, sorry, that's not what I meant. I mean that at the top of the TPM home page it says "BLOG by Joshua Micah Marshall." Then he signs individual posts (diaries whatever) as "Josh Marshall." My minor point was just that he doesn't seem to ever be Josh Micah Marshall anyway, if some sort of esoteric knowledge was supposed to be on display (when there's a Micah, there's a Joshua). My major point was -- silliness! Can we move on?

OCCOM BILL wrote:

sozobe wrote:

Roxxxanne, seriously, "nimh" and "political neophyte" don't belong in the same sentence. (Unless the sentence is "I pity the political neophyte who tangles with nimh...")

And as coincidence would have it; that appears to be precisely what happened here.

Yeah well You really don't know ANYTHING my background in politics.

Roxxxanne wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

sozobe wrote:

Roxxxanne, seriously, "nimh" and "political neophyte" don't belong in the same sentence. (Unless the sentence is "I pity the political neophyte who tangles with nimh...")

And as coincidence would have it; that appears to be precisely what happened here.

Yeah well You really don't know ANYTHING my background in politics.

I'm content to judge you by what you post. Your opinion of Nimh, alone, is sufficient to demonstrate your obvious incoherence. You are likely the only member of A2K who thinks you're more knowledgeable than Nimh. Seriously. Boldly denouncing one of A2K's most politically aware members makes you look even more ridiculous than usual.
(No small feat, that).

While we are waiting for the release of the Clinton tax returns, there's lots of info here to mine. Lots of good ammo that is still relevant... i.e., her speeches about her health care plan to cut pharmaceutical costs while being heavily invested in and profiting personally from stocks of those same pharmaceutical companies.

Other examples are her profits from her stocks in several very large oil companies while bemoaning high gas prices with her speech audiences. One of the oil companies is a French oil giant with huge contracts in Iran. Remember Iran? The country she swore she'd have nothing to do with as president as punishment for their nuclear research and production?

I just see a lot of cut and pastes from people I never heard of

Here's the deal...

Roxxxane is stuck in a hotel room in Texas, pissed off about life as a roadie canvasser the day after a disappointing vote. She has no one to vent her frustration at so she's chosen to bless her fellow Obama supporters on A2K with her own version of the Clinton kitchen sink posture, regardless of the effect it has.

I know I am more knowledgeable than nimh vis a vis American politics but I am not here to try to prove anything. For a political forum, there are damn few astute politcos here. Sorry. Again, you really don't know about my background and knowledge. But I don't care what you think, quite frankly.

latest on texas

Daily Kos

Still counting votes in Texas
by kos
Wed Mar 05, 2008 at 04:28:13 PM PST

Texas.

Caucuses

Obama 56
Clinton 44

It's looking more and more like Obama will officially win Texas.

Obama could pick up a net gain of three delegates, after all the dust settles.

Here's how Dem officials say that's possible:

Clinton won the popular vote, and could pick up as many as four delegates from that.

Obama appears to be winning the caucus voting on delegates, and could pick up as many as seven delegates there.

If that holds true, Obama would end up with three more Texas delegates than Clinton.

I am a bitch, deal with it.

tico

Quote:

See here's the problem with your thinking, blatham: I've not listened to Hannity for a very long time. I've heard none of that before, in any detail. I have given it zero creedence. But yet I criticize Ms. Obama for what she said, completely distanced from any aspect of a racial issue. So it is ridiculous for you to make a general statement that the criticism of her was "about race." It may have morphed into that for some, but not for me, and I'm relatively sure it didn't for a good many other people. And until you realize the inaccuracy of your position here, you lack the integrity you constantly require of others.

The problem with my thinking is that you are insufficiently informed on the subject that we are discussing. Odd formulation.

As to your thesis that not everyone thinks the same...

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

go to hell cyclo.

Reported.