blatham
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:09 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
On another note,

From Andrew Sullivan.

Quote:
I've been watching more TV than usual. I'm struck at how many of my fellow pundits still haven't grasped what is going on out there. They keep using their old devices and tropes to describe something actually new. Last night, I watched Hannity say the word "black" pejoratively about half a dozen times in expressing his fear and loathing of the Obama phenomenon. It was like listening to Lou Dobbs talk about Hispanics. You could see he thinks this is going to work. When Kristol is reduced to actually saying "the politics of fear" rather than simply exploiting it, you realize that the Obama campaign has not just discombobulated Clinton. It has discombobulated the pundit class. You even hear long-time defenders of the Bush Republicans talk darkly about big government if Obama gets in - as if they didn't love it for the past seven years, as if they give a **** about the size of government outside election campaigns.

They didn't see it coming. They still have no clue what they're grappling with. By the time they do, it may well be over.


Cycloptichorn


There's something akin to a paradigm shift in the works here. It will be the subject of god knows how many graduate theses and pundit books over the next several decades.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:14 pm
Thomas wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
I don't think that is entirely fair, blatham.

Ditto. I've been critical enough of Obama, and in principle I agree that not all his supporters handle criticism as graciously as he does. But I never think of Sozobe when I think of this brand of supporters.


I have to add my ditto as well. Soz and I are almost as opposite politically as Blatham and I are opposites politically, and she is never reluctant to disagree with me, but she has never demonstrated the level of arrogant snottiness or uncivility that is too often prevalent in these forums. That too is part of Obama's appeal I think. He so seldom stoops to the level of petty meanness that it is almost a shock when he takes even a good natured jab at somebody.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:20 pm
blatham wrote:
real life wrote:
High Seas wrote:


Quote:
"...... this is the saddest election I've ever worked in," said Ginger Grossman, a prominent Democratic organizer in Miami-Dade County, who says she hears countless Jewish liberals tell her they won't vote for Obama if he wins the nomination.

"It's outrageous,..... I know it's because he's black, or I feel it is," said Grossman, a Clinton supporter .....

http://www.sptimes.com/2008/02/25/Worldandnation/Party_frets_over_frac.shtml


Maybe it's because he supports anti-Semites and they support him................

Nuttin personal, but that's likely to be the dumbest and least educated comment I'm going to read today.


Quote:
from http://blog.americancongressfortruth.com/ , link provided by me



Quote:
A spry Farrakhan sings Obama's praises By SOPHIA TAREEN, Associated Press Writer
Sun Feb 24, 10:40 PM ET



CHICAGO - In his first major public address since a cancer crisis, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said Sunday that presidential candidate Barack Obama is the "hope of the entire world" that the U.S. will change for the better.........(Farrakhan) spent most of the nearly two-hour speech praising the Illinois senator.

"This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better," he said.
from http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080225/ap_on_re_us/farrakhan_saviours__day_2

Do you deny that Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and is showing his support of Obama?


Quote:
JERUSALEM - The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.

The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi's wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.

Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund's website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000........................

.................AAAN co-founder Rashid Khalidi was reportedly a director of the official PLO press agency WAFA in Beirut from 1976 to 1982, while the PLO committed scores of anti-Western attacks and was labeled by the U.S. as a terror group. Khalidi's wife, AAAN President Mona Khalidi, was reportedly WAFA's English translator during that period..............

................Khalidi in 2000 held what was described as a successful fundraiser for Obama's failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, a fact not denied by Khalidi.

Speaking in a joint interview with WND and the John Batchelor Show of New York's WABC Radio and Los Angeles' KFI Radio, Khalidi was asked about his 2000 fundraiser for Obama.

"I was just doing my duties as a Chicago resident to help my local politician," Khalidi stated.................

from http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57231


Quote:
Ali Abunimah, Vice President of the Arab American Action Network and Electronic Intifada editor, denounces Palestinian moderates.......
from http://www.chicagopeacenow.org/rr-38.html



Do you deny that the group Obama voted to fund (AAAN) is run by anti-Semites?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:22 pm
Hey, thanks for the kind words, guys! I'll accept that I'm not as gracious as Obama has been about these things, though, which is what blatham originally said. High standard and all, not much of an insult! :-)

Meanwhile, I noted that Sullivan piece too, and I tend to agree that there is some catch-up going on. And not too terribly much time left. Would love to see some serious paradigm shifts, that'd be refreshing.
0 Replies
 
Robert Gentel
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:25 pm
real life wrote:

Do you deny that Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and is showing his support of Obama?


Fallacy: Guilt by Association
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:28 pm
soz said
Quote:
Hey, thanks for the kind words, guys! I'll accept that I'm not as gracious as Obama has been about these things, though, which is what blatham originally said. High standard and all, not much of an insult!


I'm pleased that the degree of severity in my comment was correctly received.
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:29 pm
Robert Gentel wrote:
real life wrote:

Do you deny that Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and is showing his support of Obama?


Fallacy: Guilt by Association
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html


Following up:
What kind of example did Bush show, when he visited the Saudis, locked arms with them? Weren't the 9-11 terrorists from Saudi Arabia? They seemed to be let off the hook, while the Afghans and the Iraquis are taking the heat, for them! Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:29 pm
blatham wrote:
His campaign has been more gracious than Hillary's campaign. And he personally has been considerably more gracious on these matters than you have been.

Thats rich, coming from you. Of every single poster on the Politics forum here, Sozobe has been consistently the most restrained, civil, and reasonable. In fact, she has set a model and example for all of us - and pointedly, one that both you and I have singularly failed to follow.

Either of us would look more than just silly trying to put down Sozobe, of all people, as less than gracious - considering the lengths of ungraciousness we have gone to ourselves.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:30 pm
Bernie quoted-

Quote:
I've been watching more TV than usual


Precisely. It's a media invented movie. Superbly cast.

The idea is to get us all watching more TV.

He might have mentioned watching more ads as well. TV gets paid on ratings figures doesn't it?

In 1984 you have to watch TV but making them humanely watch it is much better. Much more civilised.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 01:33 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
And the monies were given in 2006 OR 2008 cycles; so, it seems likely that a large percentage of the funds from BOTH of them were before they declared their candidacies.

I mean, there's thinking ahead, and then there's thinking ahead... not much there imho.

Fair point. I hadnt realised that.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 02:10 pm
Quote:
"At this stage of the race, for a presidential candidate, it is a brazen effort to use every avenue to influence an election," Cooper said. "I can't believe the Obama people can keep a straight face and claim these aren't part of the presidential race."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/25/AR2007112501454.html


(Cooper is a Democrat, by the way)
0 Replies
 
Robert Gentel
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 02:28 pm
teenyboone wrote:
Robert Gentel wrote:
real life wrote:

Do you deny that Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and is showing his support of Obama?


Fallacy: Guilt by Association
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html


Following up:
What kind of example did Bush show, when he visited the Saudis, locked arms with them? Weren't the 9-11 terrorists from Saudi Arabia? They seemed to be let off the hook, while the Afghans and the Iraquis are taking the heat, for them! Crying or Very sad


Proving once again that two wrongs do, in fact, make a right!
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 02:46 pm
nimh wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
And the monies were given in 2006 OR 2008 cycles; so, it seems likely that a large percentage of the funds from BOTH of them were before they declared their candidacies.

I mean, there's thinking ahead, and then there's thinking ahead... not much there imho.

Fair point. I hadnt realised that.


It has been awhile since I read McCain/Feingold, but I believe any funds received by candidates prior to their declaring candidacy are subject to the same rules that apply once they have declared. (This observation may be out of context however as I didn't find the original post to which it referred.)
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 03:15 pm
Robert Gentel wrote:
teenyboone wrote:
Robert Gentel wrote:
real life wrote:

Do you deny that Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and is showing his support of Obama?


Fallacy: Guilt by Association
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html


Following up:
What kind of example did Bush show, when he visited the Saudis, locked arms with them? Weren't the 9-11 terrorists from Saudi Arabia? They seemed to be let off the hook, while the Afghans and the Iraquis are taking the heat, for them! Crying or Very sad


Proving once again that two wrongs do, in fact, make a right!


It depends on what "right" is! :wink:
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 03:25 pm
Not that again surely?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 03:32 pm
She gets mad when you call her Shirley.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 03:49 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:

So, yawn


I swear, in your eyes, Obama is JESUS. He's NEVER sinned.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 03:59 pm
maporsche wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:

So, yawn


I swear, in your eyes, Obama is JESUS. He's NEVER sinned.


This, after we've had discussions where I've outlined things I don't like about him?

Honestly. How intellectually dishonest for you to say such a thing.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 04:11 pm
I've been thinking.

These delegates that have been voted for to go to the convention must be able to change their mind.

Suppose their chosen candidate was exposed for some perfectly legal gross moral turpitude either of recent or distant history. I know there would be a scale of grossness but they would probably feel that average grossness was beyond the pale so they would either have to have a fresh primary or be able to change their mind. Voting for that candidate at the convention would associate the delegates with the turpitude. It wouldn't be a minor matter I'm inclined to think.

Having established that they can change their mind are there other circumstances where they might?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Tue 26 Feb, 2008 04:25 pm
maporsche wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:

So, yawn


I swear, in your eyes, Obama is JESUS. He's NEVER sinned.


And in your eyes, he's satan. So what?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 546
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.21 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 11:20:53