BernardR wrote:First of all, the Senator's constituents are Democrats in a Democratic State
Obama took the Senate seat that was previously held by Sen. Peter Fitzgerald - a Republican. It seems Obama's constituents include quite a large number of sometime Republican voters.
Or to put this another way, in Illinois Bush got 44% of the vote in 2004. That means that a significant number of people who voted Bush then, now approve of the job Obama is doing as their Senator.
BernardR wrote:who even give Senator Dick Turban good ratings.
If you'll look at the chart we're discussing, you'll see that Sen. Richard Durbin only gets an approval rating of 54%, with disapproval at 38% - a merely average score. Obama does much better than his senior colleague. There is apparently something special about Obama.
BernardR wrote:Are you so ignorant on polls that you do not know that most people would not dare to criticize an African-American even on the phone with a pollster?
Why would such a reluctance to express disapproval at an African-American's work be at work in Obama's case, when it obviously does not stop people from expressing disapproval at the job that, say, Condoleezza Rice is doing? In
the last poll on her performance, just 52% approved - a full 20 points less than in Obama's case - and 43% disapproved. If Rice were a Senator, she would, with those numbers, have languished somewhere in the bottom half. Obviously it is not Obama's African-American race that brings him to the top of the list.
BernardR wrote:Do you know how many people voted in the Senatorial Election In Illinois in 2004, Professer Numh?
Irrelevant; the poll was not among only those who voted last time, but among those who are eligible to vote.