Obama '08?

all that for one delegate?

YES WE CAN

Goal! Goal! Goal!

Winners laugh. Losers can suit themselves.

mysteryman wrote:

But, you still didnt answer my original question.
Would you accept an swastika hanging in a McCain office because it wasnt an "official" office?

I think a Che flag is in bad taste, while a swastika is unacceptable. The difference may have something to do with the swastika referring to mass genocide across an entire continent, 6 million exterminated Jews, all that. Che Guevara may have been a ruthless and loathsome figure (and anyone who primarily associates Che with the romanticized movie image of this guy "studying medicine, travelling through South America, sympathizing with the impoverished" should read that thread) -- but come on, he was no Hitler.

oh.........so it's ok as long as he committed fewer[/u] murders than Hitler?

Berni wrote-

Quote:

Goal! Goal! Goal!

Only a momentary weakness could have inspired such yobbism in someone who was putting money on Mrs Clinton at two gets you one in view of the latest market prices.

nimh wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

But, you still didnt answer my original question.
Would you accept an swastika hanging in a McCain office because it wasnt an "official" office?

I think a Che flag is in bad taste, while a swastika is unacceptable. The difference may have something to do with the swastika referring to mass genocide across an entire continent, 6 million exterminated Jews, all that. Che Guevara may have been a ruthless and loathsome figure (and anyone who primarily associates Che with the romanticized movie image of this guy "studying medicine, travelling through South America, sympathizing with the impoverished" should read that thread) -- but come on, he was no Hitler.

oh.........so it's ok as long as he committed fewer[/u] murders than Hitler?

In that case, just about any criminal is ok, because few if any will ever equal the total #s Hitler was responsible for.

So, if Obama campaign offices feature pics of Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer, it's all good, eh?

nimh wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

But, you still didnt answer my original question.
Would you accept an swastika hanging in a McCain office because it wasnt an "official" office?

I think a Che flag is in bad taste, while a swastika is unacceptable. The difference may have something to do with the swastika referring to mass genocide across an entire continent, 6 million exterminated Jews, all that. Che Guevara may have been a ruthless and loathsome figure (and anyone who primarily associates Che with the romanticized movie image of this guy "studying medicine, travelling through South America, sympathizing with the impoverished" should read that thread) -- but come on, he was no Hitler.

oh.........so it's ok as long as he committed fewer[/u] murders than Hitler?

In that case, just about any criminal is ok, because few if any will ever equal the total #s Hitler was responsible for.

So, if Obama campaign offices feature pics of Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer, it's all good, eh?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3c9mREXUE4

Rahm Emmanuel for VP!@!!

Cycloptichorn

real life wrote:

nimh wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

But, you still didnt answer my original question.
Would you accept an swastika hanging in a McCain office because it wasnt an "official" office?

I think a Che flag is in bad taste, while a swastika is unacceptable. The difference may have something to do with the swastika referring to mass genocide across an entire continent, 6 million exterminated Jews, all that. Che Guevara may have been a ruthless and loathsome figure (and anyone who primarily associates Che with the romanticized movie image of this guy "studying medicine, travelling through South America, sympathizing with the impoverished" should read that thread) -- but come on, he was no Hitler.

oh.........so it's ok as long as he committed fewer[/u] murders than Hitler?

In that case, just about any criminal is ok, because few if any will ever equal the total #s Hitler was responsible for.

So, if Obama campaign offices feature pics of Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer, it's all good, eh?

Well, plus the odd 'n end here that it is entirely debatable whether Che's actions resulted in more murders than have the CIA's actions in Chile and elsewhere.

So here in my home, I have neither a Che poster nor an American flag.

nimh wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

But, you still didnt answer my original question.
Would you accept an swastika hanging in a McCain office because it wasnt an "official" office?

I think a Che flag is in bad taste, while a swastika is unacceptable. The difference may have something to do with the swastika referring to mass genocide across an entire continent, 6 million exterminated Jews, all that. Che Guevara may have been a ruthless and loathsome figure (and anyone who primarily associates Che with the romanticized movie image of this guy "studying medicine, travelling through South America, sympathizing with the impoverished" should read that thread) -- but come on, he was no Hitler.

oh.........so it's ok as long as he committed fewer[/u] murders than Hitler?

In that case, just about any criminal is ok, because few if any will ever equal the total #s Hitler was responsible for.

So, if Obama campaign offices feature pics of Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer, it's all good, eh?