maporsche
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:28 pm
nimh wrote:
nimh wrote:
I'm now listening to Hillary - man, does she go on. And this weird sudden to and fro between the softly encouraging/chiding voice of a school matron and the loud combative soapbox shouting. Odd. Kind of grating, and so ... fake-sounding. To me, anyhow.

To be fair, she's now doing the Q&A thing, and she's a lot better at that! She really seems to be enjoying it, too, and it's sort of infectious - she's doing very well. Thats what helped her win NH too, of course - just going through endless Q&As at every townhall meeting, making sure to answer pretty much every single last question.


What station are you watching?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:31 pm
nimh wrote:
nimh wrote:
I'm now listening to Hillary - man, does she go on. And this weird sudden to and fro between the softly encouraging/chiding voice of a school matron and the loud combative soapbox shouting. Odd. Kind of grating, and so ... fake-sounding. To me, anyhow.

To be fair, she's now doing the Q&A thing, and she's a lot better at that! She really seems to be enjoying it, too, and it's sort of infectious - she's doing very well. Thats what helped her win NH too, of course - just going through endless Q&As at every townhall meeting, making sure to answer pretty much every single last question.


That and some extremely convenient tears.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:42 pm
Quite a win! Congrats, guys.

Obama's speech was typically wonderful. It's such a treat to have an orator with his level of gift. Particularly following upon this last twit who needs soldiers or flags or aircraft carriers or faux cowboy agitprop to substitute for a soul, a backbone and a brain.

God, this is an interesting election.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:43 pm
congratulations to Obama... savor the flavor dude... it won't happen much more.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:46 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
congratulations to Obama... savor the flavor dude... it won't happen much more.


It's almost mathematically impossible at this point for any Dem to win before August - so you'd better get used to seeing Obama Smile

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:52 pm
blatham wrote:
Quite a win! Congrats, guys.

Obama's speech was typically wonderful. It's such a treat to have an orator with his level of gift. Particularly following upon this last twit who needs soldiers or flags or aircraft carriers or faux cowboy agitprop to substitute for a soul, a backbone and a brain.

God, this is an interesting election.


can't disagree with that.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:53 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
congratulations to Obama... savor the flavor dude... it won't happen much more.


It's almost mathematically impossible at this point for any Dem to win before August - so you'd better get used to seeing Obama Smile

Cycloptichorn


doesn't change the facts... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:02 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
congratulations to Obama... savor the flavor dude... it won't happen much more.


It's almost mathematically impossible at this point for any Dem to win before August - so you'd better get used to seeing Obama Smile

Cycloptichorn


doesn't change the facts... :wink:


You may not of noticed, but Obama has more delegates then Clinton does. Is that the face you're referring to?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:13 pm
face?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:25 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
face?


http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2008/hillaryfacethumbnailpx9.jpg
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:31 pm
Er, fact

Nice face tho

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 11:04 pm
maporsche wrote:
nimh wrote:
To be fair, she's now doing the Q&A thing, and she's a lot better at that! She really seems to be enjoying it, too, and it's sort of infectious - she's doing very well. Thats what helped her win NH too, of course - just going through endless Q&As at every townhall meeting, making sure to answer pretty much every single last question.


What station are you watching?

I was watching this live feed on cnn.com...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 11:18 pm
Quote:
Winning Large

by digby


Congratulations to Senator Obama! He has won South Carolina in a landslide and with 24% of white voters to boot. I think that should put to rest the idea that he has somehow become the "black" candidate and can't compete. The Democrats aren't going to win South Carolina in the general --- it's the most conservative state in the country -- so this showing is meaningful.

It looks like Clinton came in far behind, although CNN is reporting that about 34% of her coalition was African American, which is a small bit of good news for her. Edwards' voters were, perhaps unsurprisingly, nearly all white, with the majority being white males. (This is South Carolina, after all.)

So, this ugly race is over and it looks like all the racial talk was overblown and overplayed. The voters, once again, made their voices heard and the politicians will have to heed them.

I would hope that the media will take a little breather as well. Watching the concern trolling about Democratic racial divisiveness among people like Peggy Noonan, Joe Scarborough and Bill Bennett is enough to make me sick and should give progressives pause. As I wrote last night, I don't think this helps Senator Obama any more than it helps Clinton.

It would be really nice if the media, both liberal and otherwise, would calm the hell down. They've been out of their minds since Iowa with the identity politics, pushing both the gender and the racial angles beyond all measure. But the fact is that this is much more complicated than they are letting on with lots of demographic information that they are ignoring. Obama, for instance, once again did extremely well among young people of all races, which it seems to me is much more salient than the media have yet to acknowledge. If he keeps this up, we will see an entire generation making its home in the Democratic Party and that is a tremendous advantage.

This is a great win for Barack Obama, and I'm genuinely thrilled that he was able to win a bi-racial majority in a three person field. It's a nice bounce going into Super Tuesday, where, hopefully it will be so complicated for the press that they will actually be forced to report on the campaign instead of pontificating at length about things that are going to screw us in November no matter who ultimately wins.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 11:57 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
So, this ugly race is over and it looks like all the racial talk was overblown and overplayed. The voters, once again, made their voices heard and the politicians will have to heed them.
Why post this meaningless dribble? I don't want the election to be about identity politics any more than the next guy, but how does SC demonstrate that it isn't? The black guy got 24% of the white vote and 80% of the black vote... and we're supposed to use that as proof that race isn't where it's at? Again, I'm not suggesting it is outside of SC, but this Digby fool seems to think he's proven something. 55% for a black man is encouraging, and something we can all be proud of... but I wonder if Digby realizes what percentage of these voters were black.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 26 Jan, 2008 11:58 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
So, this ugly race is over and it looks like all the racial talk was overblown and overplayed. The voters, once again, made their voices heard and the politicians will have to heed them.
Why post this meaningless dribble? I don't want the election to be about identity politics any more than the next guy, but how does SC demonstrate that it isn't? The black guy got 24% of the white vote and 80% of the black vote... and we're supposed to use that as proof that race isn't where it's at? Again, I'm not suggesting it is outside of SC, but this Digby fool seems to think he's proven something. 55% for a black man is encouraging, and something we can all be proud of... but I wonder if Digby realizes what percentage of these voters were black.


Probably she does; when Jesse Jackson won in SC, he got somewhere around 5% of the vote in what is a very Republican state.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 12:12 am
The Republicans are afraid of Obama - the establishment ones, at least. I've been reading lines such as this all night -

Quote:


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 12:14 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Probably she does; when Jesse Jackson won in SC, he got somewhere around 5% of the vote in what is a very Republican state.

Cycloptichorn
So what? I'd be surprised if Jesse Jackson got 5% today.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 12:24 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Probably she does; when Jesse Jackson won in SC, he got somewhere around 5% of the vote in what is a very Republican state.

Cycloptichorn
So what? I'd be surprised if Jesse Jackson got 5% today.


Well, yeah. But it really puts the lie to the Bill Clinton comments earlier comparing Obama's win to Jacksons' previous wins in SC, and the Clinton message that he has become the 'black candidate.'

From Captain's Quarters:

Quote:
According to CNN's exit poll, he won a majority of non-black votes in the 18-29-year-old demographic, and a quarter of non-black votes in two other demographic age groups. Hillary didn't win pluralities among non-black age demographics; Edwards actually did better than Hillary did in these categories.


That's a lot of cross-racial appeal in a place where there hasn't been much of that in the past. Truthfully, the number of black voters could have been way less and he still would have won.

Ccloptichorn
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 12:40 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That's a lot of cross-racial appeal in a place where there hasn't been much of that in the past.
No, it isn't. It's a new generation that seems less bigoted, and the relative few who bother to vote (all 5% of them) like Obama. That Hillary split the majority of whitey with Edwards proves nothing eitherÂ… though it suggests that Edwards continued campaign might be good for Obama.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Sun 27 Jan, 2008 12:43 am
I'm kind of feeling like Edwards is set to be the VP candidate again. Does anyone think Hill or Barack would choose each other as running mates.

I don't.

I think I've heard through the mills that they've both declared they would not accept the VP position.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 373
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 11/27/2025 at 02:53:47