Below viewing threshold (view)
JoeBruno
 
  0  
Wed 22 Feb, 2012 08:24 am
@sozobe,
Possible Obama campaign slogans for 2012;
1)I'm not qualified for anything else.
2)Biden is too old to get another job
3)If reelected, I promise to lie to you only on Mondays and Wednesdays.
4)The first 4 years was just practice. Now, I'm gonna get serious.
5)If I lose, I'll have to go back to Kenya and tend goats.
6)If I lose, Michelle will cut me off.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Wed 22 Feb, 2012 08:41 am
Don't quit your day job, Joe, you've got no future doing stand-up.
parados
 
  1  
Wed 22 Feb, 2012 09:02 am
@MontereyJack,
Too late, he already quit his day job.

Well, maybe he had no future at his day job.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 22 Feb, 2012 11:03 am
@parados,
There are many like JoeBruno; no brains of their own.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 01:37 pm
Controversial Maricopa County (AZ) Sheriff Joe Arpaio will hold a press conference at 3 pm (ET) to release his findings on the authenticity of President Obama's birth certificate.
Butrflynet
 
  2  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 01:43 pm
@realjohnboy,
This is nothing but free publicity seeking for his 2012 re-election campaign and the media of all stripes are falling for it.
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 02:20 pm
@Butrflynet,
I believe he is also in some legal trouble.
There is a live feed of the press conference but it is too herky-jerky for my computer. Based on what I did see from the set up for it, Obama will be proven to not be a citizen. Or something like that.
roger
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 03:34 pm
@realjohnboy,
The sheriff of Maricopa County will make the determination. Fascinating.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 04:13 pm
@roger,
I think a better description would be stupid.
Butrflynet
 
  2  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 05:53 pm
@realjohnboy,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-news-blog/2012/mar/01/forgery-sheriff-joe-arpaio-barack-obama-birth-certificate?newsfeed=true

Quote:
Forgery most foul! Sheriff Joe Arpaio's birth certificate revelations

Arizona sheriff's six-month investigation ends with Arpaio vowing to find whoever 'forged' Barack Obama's birth certificate

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/3/1/1330643505604/Barack-Obamas-long-form-b-007.jpg
President Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate is displayed with indications of what was said to be computer-generated forgery. Photograph: Joshua Lott/REUTERS

It's hard work being a conspiracy theorist. Just look at Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the self-styled tough guy of American policing, who has released the preliminary results of his "birther" investigation into whether Barack Obama is a true American.

The details of the inquiry – announced at a packed press conference in Arizona – were enough to make you want to lie down in a darkened room for a week just to recover from the terrible exertion of it all. And that's even before you hear his conclusion: that Obama's birth certificate is probably a computer-generated fraud.

A stream of conspiratorialists as numerous as the Dead Sea Scrolls have already been down this road, of course, led by that epitome of investigative integrity Donald Trump. But leaving that aside, let's look at Arpaio's inquiry and the extraordinary lengths it took.

It all began when Arpaio received a delegation of 250 Tea Party members from his district of Maricopa county pleading with him to save America from the disaster of an alien president. It was an appeal, he told the Guardian, that he could not ignore.

"I'm not the kind of guy who turns his back on people when they ask for help," he said.

So off he goes and pulls together what he calls a "cold case posse" of his mates – former cops, other law enforcers, and journalists.

Arpaio's inquiry had nothing at all to do with the fact that he is currently himself under investigation by the US department of justice – ie, the Obama administration – for blatant racial profiling in his police district. "This has nothing to do with politics!" he bellowed at the press conference. "If we could find evidence that the president was born in this country, I would be very happy."

(Odd that he said that. He looked so very, very happy to be announcing in front of the nation's TV cameras that they had uncovered the exact opposite.)

Arpaio's "posse" was an assemblage of individuals with impeccable objective track records. Take the lead journalist, Jerome Corsie. He writes for the right-wing blog WorldNetDaily.com and is author of the conspiracy book Obama Nation.

The posse set to work, coming up with a mass of acronyms, jargon, and gobbledygook which they put together in a series of videos projected at the press conference. Warning: at this point in the proceedings, you really need high energy levels:

• First, they tested a "genuine" birth cerficate to see how it was put together. They stripped away the green background, photocopied the certificate on green basket-weave safety paper (Lord only knows why), then scanned it into a computer and opened it in Adobe Illustrator.

The result? A document in which the texture of the paper can be seen under the ink, with just one layer and noise consistent through the document.

• Then they did the same with the Obama birth certificate posted on the White House website on 27 April 2011. What did they find? Oh fraud most foul and unnatural! They discovered not one but NINE layers in which parts of the certificate had been put together separately, as well as noise that was not evenly distributed as it should have been.

• Finally, they look at Obama's selective service card and shows that that too is not only forged but is – gasp! – "poorly forged!" Gadzooks, if someone is going to launch a conspiracy to put a foreigner in the White House, they could at least do it properly.

So what are we to conclude from all this? Not, Arpaio insisted over and over again, that anyone – least of all him – is accusing Obama of being a liar and a fraud. Oh, no.

"I am not accusing the president of any crime. All I'm saying is that we seem to have documents that are forged. We need to find out who committed these crimes."

So that's all clear then. Somehow one has to assume that this isn't the last we've heard from Arpaio and his disinterested cold case posse.




0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 06:00 pm
@RABEL222,
I think a better description would be ignorant and dangerous.
He's a sheriff? Definitely dangerous.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 06:34 pm
(I am amused that there have only been about 5 posts to this thread since I mentioned Sheriff Joe about 5 hours ago. But there have been 140 views of this thread in the same time frame.)
roger
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 06:57 pm
@realjohnboy,
I've been aware of that ol' boy's history since before Napolean was a corporal. He never quits, does he?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 1 Mar, 2012 06:59 pm
@realjohnboy,
This sheriff doesn't know about fraud, and doesn't know about evidence.

How can the two newspapers in Hawaii report his birth if he was born any place else?

Quote:
OBAMA'S BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENTS

Email This Page To A Friend
What Really Happened

Hawaii has two major newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin.
BOTH newspapers include birth announcements, and BOTH newspapers record the August 4th, 1961 birth of Barack Obama.

The Honolulu Advertiser The Star Bulletin


This sheriff is dense and dangerous!
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Tue 27 Mar, 2012 04:38 pm
I was hoping that there might be an A2K thread devoted to to the Supreme Court arguments about the health care legislation (aka Obama Care). The court had the opportunity to punt on the issue for a couple of years until the mandate to either obtain insurance or pay a "tax" kicks in. The court, wisely in my mind, seems to be inclined to rule on the whole thing by late June, prior to the fall election.
Today's arguments were fascinating to listen to, as the justices aggressively questioned the lawyers on both sides of the issue. The consensus of opinion seems to be that the advocate in favor of Obama Care got beat up a bit with regards to whether the federal government can require people to buy a commercial product. The broccoli industry also got beat up.
Justices' Roberts and Kennedy are the guys to watch. If they decide Obama Care is unconstitutional, the law will fall. But if one of them decides otherwise, it will pass.
Is that your reading?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 27 Mar, 2012 04:42 pm
@realjohnboy,
there is

http://able2know.org/topic/186909-1

It is alarming that A2K'ers have not been interested in this enough to talk about it....we are talking about one year of Obama's time which was devoted to this, and more importantly a ballsy move to try to expand government power. This SCOTUS ruling is a big deal.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Tue 27 Mar, 2012 04:47 pm
@hawkeye10,
Meh. I think the oral arguments are overrated, and that most of the guys have their minds made up about it already. Not much fun in sitting around guessing what Anton Kennedy is going to do - I can't see Scalia, Alito, Thomas, or Roberts possibly betraying their masters on this one.

Cycloptichorn
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 27 Mar, 2012 04:52 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Not much fun in sitting around guessing what Anton Kennedy is going to do -


Some people think that debate has more important aims than "fun".
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Tue 27 Mar, 2012 04:55 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Not much fun in sitting around guessing what Anton Kennedy is going to do -


Some people think that debate has more important aims than "fun".


Considering that nobody gives a **** what our 'debate' produces, and it will have zero effect on the actual outcome, in what way is the aim of our conversation more than 'fun?'

If it's not enjoyable, there's zero point to conversation on A2K.

Cycloptichorn
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 2129
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.38 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 12:29:04