Obama '08?

@plainoldme,

Funny; I always believed that anyone who would be responsible for the killing of tens of thousands of innocent humans were criminals and inhuman; Bush started two wars in the Middle East. Iraq didn't do anything to us that deserved "shock and awe," and Afghanistan just happens to be where the Taliban (from Saudi Arabia) hid. Afghans were the "innocent" country.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

What's the magic number for innocents killed?

Obama is as responsible for the deaths of some innocent humans.

Do you consider him a criminal and inhuman?

2 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn, Go to hell; I'm not interested in anything you have to say or ask.

As a matter of fact, you're now on my scroll past list.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

I see you can't answer the question.

Better to just scroll on.

1 Reply

Has Finn said anything intelligent yet? I just know he posted; not what he wrote.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

CI

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4150/5059001585_1207acec91_z.jpg

1 Reply

Everyone who has more money than you probably stole it.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

CI

been on the NAMBLA site again I see....

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

What's the magic number for innocents killed?

There is no magic number, Finn, war crimes are war crimes. If not a soul had be killed, the invasion was still an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation which is the ultimate war crime.

Quote:

Obama is as responsible for the deaths of some innocent humans.

Do you consider him a criminal and inhuman?

Yes, he has committed war crimes. It just doesn't seem to matter who y'all elect, they get sucked into a morass of inhumanity and they all end up committing war crimes.

0 Replies

@mysteryman,

Quote:

So is it your belief that everybody that is rich is a crook?
Do you believe that everybody that is wealthy has somehow stolen that money?

Certainly there are many rich people in the USA that have made their money by stealing it from the people of other nations. How many, well now that a down right interesting question, MM.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

I see you can't answer the question.

What a hypocrite you are, Finn!

1 Reply

@JTT,

That's the reason I put Finn on "scroll over." He's not worth the time or effort.

0 Replies

@blueveinedthrobber,

Because you are familiar with the site's content or you find the photo arousing?

2 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Because you are familiar with the site's content or you find the photo arousing?

blueveinedthrobber is a ring pirate.

1 Reply

@okie,

Quote:

Oh give us a break, cyclops, do you have to go back to your favorite whipping boys? Did I see the charges were dropped on DeLay?

When did you see that?\

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7300944.html

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/11/19/DeLay-does-not-testify-as-trial-nears-end/UPI-48651290186395/

Quote:

AUSTIN, Texas, Nov. 19 (UPI) -- Testimony in Tom DeLay's money-laundering trial ended in Austin, Texas, without the former House majority leader testifying.

Closing arguments are set for Monday, the Houston Chronicle reported.

When in doubt, just make crap up, eh okie?

Based on the testimony that Delay was at meetings, I will be surprised if he is acquitted.

1 Reply

@parados,

okie is good at that kind of "thing." If he doesn't know, make **** up to fill in the spaces. That he fails to do even a fact check on what he posts tells us much about this genius.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

I believe starting wars of aggression against sovereign states is criminal.

I was thinking of the Gulf of Tonkin incident and of how the left doubted the veracity of it within two or three years of it supposedly having happened. i wonder how much of what the bush administration told us is untrue.

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

I believe starting wars of aggression against sovereign states is criminal.
I was thinking of the Gulf of Tonkin incident and of how the left doubted the veracity of it within two or three years of it supposedly having happened. i wonder how much of what the bush administration told us is untrue.

Uh, that was a liberal Democrat, LBJ, that trumped up the Gulf of Tonkin incident, pom.

2 Replies

@okie,

okie, It seems you have the wrong info on the Vietnam War. Read Daniel Ellsberg's book, and study the case against Vietnam beginning with Kennedy. What you will learn is that the Gulf of Tonkin incidents about attacks are questionable based on who's reports you believe. It was claimed that Johnson lied to get approval for the Vietnam War. It's not as clear cut as you make it out to be.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

To clarify, are you now defending LBJ, that he did not lie after all? Is that because he was a Democrat, imposter?

1 Reply

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know