Phoenix32890 wrote:soz- Interesting.
I know that somewhere in cyberspace there is a site that lists the various contributors to a particular party. Does anyone know of a site that lists the contributors to a particular candidate?
This one used to show candidate contributions Phoenix. I didn't take time to check to see if there is a comprehensive listing yet.
http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/index.asp
The thing is that so many candidates--Obama certainly is not the only one--to claim superior ethics in campaign contributions but sort of overlooks those little side deals and the soft money that can make all the difference in a campaign. He may in fact be making an honest effort to do it better but he has to get out there to court the black vote, the Jewish vote, the labor vote, the Christian vote, etc. etc. etc. just like all the other candidates are doing. And they all are courting dollars as much or more than they are courting votes.
I hope Obama does keep his nose cleaner than most do, but he simply won't raise enough from the Uncle Joes and Aunt Freckles out there. He's going to have to take some from opportunists too whether or not they actually call themselves special interests.
For instance George Soros who is the godfather of and pretty much rules the policies related to groups like MoveOn.org, Mediamatters, etc. gave a modest amount (for him) to Obama's Senate campaign. By the time Soros' 'family members' had kicked in addiition 'private' contributions, however, Obama had benefitted by some $60,000, a pretty good chunk for a senator.
There's no sense fretting over it though. Nobody is going to get elected these days unless they have many many millions in their war chest.