Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 08:48 am
Lash wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Lash wrote:
...that he's not running...? LOL


Nice non-answer.

You were ga-ga about Giuliani a while back iirc. Switched horses quick enough tho.

What positive platform issues are Republicans going to run on this cycle?

Cycloptichorn

Your completely erroneous statement about me "switching horses" is on par with all your other claims hereablouts.

What's going on with you? You've been talking to blatham too much. Very Happy


Thus the IIRC. It is entirely possible that I don't remember correctly, but I will have to go back and see.

You, and other Republicans, have not been able to answer what should be a simple question: What positive platforms will the Republican candidate for President run on this year?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:08 am
Well, I went back to see, and you're full of sh*t.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1920809#1920809

Quote:
nimh-- I am my own source on this. I feel like I know the general mood of the party, even when I don't necessarily agree with them. Sometimes, these things take a while to show up in polling. Nobody has hit McCain as a traitor hard, but wait until primaries. You'll see what I mean.

The Gang of 14 thing will have ramifications. People consider that he has screwed the party on more than one occasion. He's given ideological loyalists lots of ammunition.

But, as always, we'll eventually see.


Giuliani tops polls.


You ready to start 'calling him a traitor, hard?' You may not - but you think your fellow Republicans will come out in droves to support the guy?

Here's a good one:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2538425#2538425

Quote:

Nimh: "McCain win the Presidency? You wanna bet on that?"

I'm with you on that. No way will McCain win.


Quite a flip-flop you have going on here.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2543225#2543225

Quote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Quote:
JPB hit the nail on the head. I too cared not a bit who Clinton slept with. I did care that the leader of our land disobeyed a Supreme Court order and lied to a grand jury about it. Giuliani won't suffer the same blowback, because he won't tell ridiculous lies. I agree that the GOP doesn't want him... but suspect they may be forced to admit he's there only hope by the time the day arrives. Unless something changes; no Bush clone has a shot and that would include Romney. McCain appears unlikely to regain his popularity, because of his flip-flopping. You here Liberals who've disowned him for his views on Abortion even as Republicans disown him for his views on Abortion. Some fences can't be straddled. He's given up the only cards that could get him forgiven for his War stance, and hasn't even succeeded in convincing the people he's pandering to. For now; that leaves Rudy... who'll hit you with "sorry you disagree, but that's how I feel... let's focus on what we can agree on". In my book he is like a third party candidate and the Right gets to choose between that and losing. Ideal situation if you ask me.


Wonderful response. I agree completely.


You agree completely that McCain is unlikely to regain his popularity?

Lash, you have been all over the place on this issue. And that's okay. But to make a statement like:

Quote:

If we do, he'll (McCain will) win.

All he has to do is survive the primaries.


... and then call someone wrong for calling you out on your shifting opinion on the guy?

Now, you may still be backing Giuliani as your main horse. From that angle, your statement is correct. But your contention that McCain will win if he survives the primaries is nothing but false bravado from you, and you know it - it contradicts many things you've said about him in the past.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:33 am
Lash wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
McCain is actually polling better that Giuliani right now. The Laughing was in response to "Even if that is true, they are all miles ahead of the Republican candidates - none of which has a clear and real shot of winning!" which is utter and COMPLETE nonsense. :wink: Laughing


He has no money and half the Republican party hates his guts. I really, really hope that they do nominate him. Really.

Cycloptichorn

If we do, he'll win.

All he has to do is survive the primaries.

I thought you were talking about Rudy.

That was a lot of wrangling for such a mild comment.

Your intended subject wasn't clear.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:35 am
Cyclo--

What's wrong with you? You're transferring your nutty false bravado all over me. You are the one making all kinds of crazy statements...I'm just munching on popcorn, waiting for your head to pop off.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:35 am
Lash wrote:
Lash wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
McCain is actually polling better that Giuliani right now. The Laughing was in response to "Even if that is true, they are all miles ahead of the Republican candidates - none of which has a clear and real shot of winning!" which is utter and COMPLETE nonsense. :wink: Laughing


He has no money and half the Republican party hates his guts. I really, really hope that they do nominate him. Really.

Cycloptichorn

If we do, he'll win.

All he has to do is survive the primaries.

I thought you were talking about Rudy.

That was a lot of wrangling for such a mild comment.

Your intended subject wasn't clear.


Fair enough.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:39 am
I think McC is a fruit basket turn over.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:40 am
Lash wrote:
I think McC is a fruit basket turn over.


It's sad, because he used to be considered sensible and moderate. Nowdays, I don't know any more.

McCain debates well, though. I wonder if his cred will go up a bit after the season begins.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:43 am
I really think he's (and this isn't meant to be an insult, I don't bear him ill will) but I think he's edging into a mild dementia or something. He has undergone a significant alteration.

He'll continue to decline.

He's not who he was.

MO
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:45 am
PS, cyclo--

I apologize for being rude to you. I was a little frustrated with our conversation. I hope you'll overlook it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:50 am
Lash wrote:
PS, cyclo--

I apologize for being rude to you. I was a little frustrated with our conversation. I hope you'll overlook it.


I as well, sorry

Cycloptichorn Embarrassed

ps - I am happy we get along better these days. I've been working on moderating my tone, but it is difficult and one of my failings.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:56 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Lash wrote:
PS, cyclo--

I apologize for being rude to you. I was a little frustrated with our conversation. I hope you'll overlook it.


I as well, sorry

Cycloptichorn Embarrassed

ps - I am happy we get along better these days. I've been working on moderating my tone, but it is difficult and one of my failings.

Well, I couldn't possibly understand that...LOL!!!
(((((((((cyclo))))))))))
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 6 Apr, 2007 11:59 am
(Awww....! :-D)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sat 7 Apr, 2007 06:37 am
Lash wrote:
I think McC is a fruit basket turn over.


There's nothing quite so yummy as that soft center of oven-baked wicker goodness.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Sat 7 Apr, 2007 08:05 am
Interesting observations from Tim Russert (note sure why this is dated for Monday)

Quote:
Monday April 9, 2007

Imus: "How about Senator Barack Obama raising twenty-five million dollars?"

Tim Russert, NBC News: "That's pretty interesting and for lots of reasons. One, it's a hundred thousand donors, half of those on the internet, which means that he has a guaranteed revenue stream from now until the end of the primary campaign process. What we learned about the internet is that when people give one-hundred, or one-hundred fifty dollars to a candidate they are a very fertile group to go back to on a regular basis, and you can give up to twenty-three hundred dollars. So, since his numbers were announced it appears he's raised a couple more million dollars because of the excitement generated by this announcement. Secondly, it appears that he has raised more for the primary campaign, and you have to have two accounts, one for the primary, and if you're the nominee one for the general, than perhaps Hillary Clinton in this latest go-round and we should know that on April 15th, and also cash on hand. He very well may have a very significant amount of cash on hand. Make no mistake about it, Hillary Clinton raised a lot of money too, but any sense of inevitability or of a coronation is over. Barack Obama is going to be a well-funded, extremely competitive candidate for the democratic nomination."

Imus: " I've had people tell me, who don't agree with him politically, and who are not, and who are not, patronizing him because he's an African American, tell me that they like him, so."

Tim Russert: "Well, it is something--you know, when you watch campaigns the way I try to I have not seen excitement, raw excitement generated by this in a long, long time. The size of the crowds, the enthusiasm of the crowds, and if you talk to college kids--you know my son happens to go to college, but you talk to college kids, no matter what they're ideology or political philosophy, they are intrigued by him. I had a young kid yesterday say to me that they were watching Tiger Woods play in the Masters, and there's an interesting notion that America in 2007, when you have Tiger Woods, who's African American and Asian American and you have Barack Obama with a white mom and a black dad and having grown up in Hawaii and lived in Indonesia that is--that has appeal to young Americans. It's an America that they're very comfortable with, and the fact that someone like that is running for President of the United States with a Harvard education, and the United States Senator of Illinois, I think really does connect with people."

msnbc
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sat 7 Apr, 2007 08:18 am
JPB wrote:
(note sure why this is dated for Monday)


Because it will be broadcasted on Monday.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 7 Apr, 2007 05:48 pm
New York Times

Quote:


...Continued at the link above
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Wed 11 Apr, 2007 06:03 pm
Now Obama is being attacked for not being "black enough" and for not responding to the comments made by Imus...

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/

Tell me,exactly what should he have done or said that wasnt being said by everybody else?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 11 Apr, 2007 06:50 pm
Discussion of that here, mysteryman:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=94506

Belongs here too of course.

I'm a bit dismayed that he called for Imus to be fired. Haven't seen his wording yet though, will go look for that.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 11 Apr, 2007 06:53 pm
This is what I found (there was a link on Miller's thread):

Quote:
"I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus," Obama said in an interview with ABC News, "but I would also say that there's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude."


Hmm. Is the staff of a presidential candidate really equivalent to a radio personality? If that were taken to a logical extreme, I'm not sure there would be many comedians/ radio hosts/ musicians left.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 11 Apr, 2007 07:04 pm
Thought you might be interested in this, Sozobe:



Quote:
The book, the "Best Speeches of Barack Obama," groups 77 of Barack Obama's most notable speeches into 16 categories including Iraq, education, healthcare, the environment, foreign policy & defense and his plans for the economy.

In addition to the speeches, the book contains Obama's floor statements and podcasts, including transcripts of the podcasts he called in from his cell phone while visiting the Middle East and Iraq.

The free e-book includes all 500-plus pages from the just released print edition. No email address or registration is required for the download. It is available at http://www.freeobamabook.com/.


The free e-book offer is guaranteed through June 30, 2007 at http://www.freeobamabook.com/. No email address or registration required. It is an instant download with one click.

In case the link gets removed by the automatic de-spammer, that link is freeobamabook(dot)com


I'm still looking for transcripts of his recent town hall meetings for you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 185
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 08/05/2025 at 10:31:11