H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:42 am
@parados,
Parasite please!
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:46 am
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

Right wing website???

I found it on NPR!!
Are you now saying that they are "right-wing"?


You found it on NPR, or you found a link to NPR on some other website and followed it to see the story? Be honest!

Cycloptichorn
parados
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:48 am
@mysteryman,
Quote:

If there had been policies enacted by Bush, designed only to help white people, you would have immediately called those programs racist, and you would have been totally correct.

That is nothing but your fantasy MM when it comes to my response. If part of an overall program targets a group, I see no problem with that.

Did you complain about the preferences given minority run business during the Bush administration? Why not?

Quote:

Now, since Obama is supposed to be the President of the entire country, it just seems to me that enacting programs designed only to help one group is counterproductive, and has racial implications to it that shouldnt be there.
What a load of nonsense MM. Different people need different help. Pointing out they were helped differently isn't evidence that Obama ignored others. Minorities weren't given the same help as Wall Street Bankers. Does that mean Bush wasn't President of the entire country?
mysteryman
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:56 am
@parados,
Quote:
Did you complain about the preferences given minority run business during the Bush administration? Why not?


Yes, I did.
I also complained about any preferences given to white owned businesses.
I do not believe that race should be considered at all when a program to help business is enacted.
It should be for everybody or nobody.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:57 am
@Cycloptichorn,
I found it on NPR.
If you had actually followed the link, you would have seen that.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:09 am
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

I found it on NPR.
If you had actually followed the link, you would have seen that.


Of course I followed the link. What I asked is: where did YOU get the link to that article? Were you perusing the NPR website? Or did you find a link to it on some right-wing blog, and then go to NPR for the story?

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:21 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
What I asked is: where did YOU get the link to that article? Were you perusing the NPR website? Or did you find a link to it on some right-wing blog, and then go to NPR for the story?

Cycloptichorn

What difference would that make, cyclops? Seriously, what difference does it make how mm found the site, the fact remains that the info. he found was on NPR. If you have a neighbor tell you that a tornado is coming, would you disbelieve it solely on the fact that you hate your neighbor, and refuse to lift your eyes up to look for the tornado? Cyclops, are you that biased that you can't escape from your liberal cocoon long enough to become informed about what is going on around you?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:25 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
What I asked is: where did YOU get the link to that article? Were you perusing the NPR website? Or did you find a link to it on some right-wing blog, and then go to NPR for the story?

Cycloptichorn

What difference would that make, cyclops?


It fits the model of many of MM's past posts here: he finds some story linked to on a right-wing site and then posts it here without bothering to do background analysis or apply logical thought to the question. These little posts seem always be designed to point out some flaw in the Democrats or in Obama, but tend to fall far short of the mark.

Quote:
Seriously, what difference does it make how mm found the site, the fact remains that the info. he found was on NPR. If you have a neighbor tell you that a tornado is coming, would you disbelieve it solely on the fact that you hate your neighbor, and refuse to lift your eyes up to look for the tornado? Cyclops, are you that biased that you can't escape from your liberal cocoon long enough to become informed about what is going on around you?


There's nothing meaningful in this paragraph to respond to. Instead, I'll point out that you have failed to respond to several posts I've made in the last few days which show that your attempts to blame the government for the Foreclosure crisis are completely incorrect, both logically and factually.

When presented with this evidence and argumentation, you simply don't answer the posts. How do you reconcile this with your accusation that I am the one in a 'cocoon?'

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:39 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
There's nothing meaningful in this paragraph to respond to. Instead, I'll point out that you have failed to respond to several posts I've made in the last few days which show that your attempts to blame the government for the Foreclosure crisis are completely incorrect, both logically and factually.

When presented with this evidence and argumentation, you simply don't answer the posts. How do you reconcile this with your accusation that I am the one in a 'cocoon?'

Cycloptichorn

Sorry about not responding, but my life does not revolve around A2K. If you really need to know, I have been on the road for the past week and it has not been convenient to spend time with the laptop to post here. I haven't gone back to read all of your posts about that yet, but suffice it say that I am certainly not alone in my assessment. I have posted before the fact that a very respected owner of a bank around here spoke in an interview about it and he linked it all back to the CRA. He has owned the bank for a very long time, and they are one of the most healthy banks around. If you wish to place trust in who is saying something, I would trust what he says, because he knows much more about it than I do, or you do. I also trust far more what conservatives and most Republicans say about this, over Democrats, because I see the hypocrisy of Democrats on the economy and housing issue. To this day, I see nothing, absolutely nothing, has been done about the Fannie and Freddie corruption. Yes, corruption. Face it, cyclops.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:43 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
There's nothing meaningful in this paragraph to respond to. Instead, I'll point out that you have failed to respond to several posts I've made in the last few days which show that your attempts to blame the government for the Foreclosure crisis are completely incorrect, both logically and factually.

When presented with this evidence and argumentation, you simply don't answer the posts. How do you reconcile this with your accusation that I am the one in a 'cocoon?'

Cycloptichorn

Sorry about not responding, but my life does not revolve around A2K. If you really need to know, I have been on the road for the past week and it has not been convenient to spend time with the laptop to post here. I haven't gone back to read all of your posts about that yet, but suffice it say that I am certainly not alone in my assessment. I have posted before the fact that a very respected owner of a bank around here spoke in an interview about it and he linked it all back to the CRA. He has owned the bank for a very long time, and they are one of the most healthy banks around. If you wish to place trust in who is saying something, I would trust what he says, because he knows much more about it than I do, or you do.


I don't place trust in anyone's opinion; I place trust in factual analysis. Your supposed banker friend could be right or wrong completely and you'd have no clue, because rather than do your own homework on this issue (which is hard) you instead decide to believe him because he told you something you want to hear: basically, that the Democrats are responsible for all the harms of the world.

That's intellectually lazy and not something to be proud of. What more, in this case it is actively embarassing you, as you keep posting things which simply are not supported by the facts. I submit that you have no knowledge at all of how the CRA operates, what the requirements for banks to operate under it are, or how CRA loans affected the financial crisis, if at all. Yet you come here and pontificate about it as if you do, and when called on it, you don't respond with facts but with insults and Appeals to Authority - if you respond at all.

Take your time to research the CRA and respond on this issue; I'll wait.

Quote:
I also trust far more what conservatives and most Republicans say about this, over Democrats, because I see the hypocrisy of Democrats on the economy and housing issue. To this day, I see nothing, absolutely nothing, has been done about the Fannie and Freddie corruption. Yes, corruption. Face it, cyclops.


You don't actually give a **** about corruption, so why pretend like you do? For years you never said a single word about corrupt politicians - when it was Bush and his cronies giving giant contracts to their buddies, or Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay running the House like a giant cash register. You didn't care then and you don't now. You only like attacking Democrats, because it's easier to lob allegations than it is to research complex subjects and form a narrative based on facts.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:53 am
okie wrote:

When I read your post, I wondered who this Sheila Bair is, and what political direction she goes, which might help explain her opinion. Sure enough, I think the following may be a very strong hint, so I am guessing her opinion might be very biased and not worthy of the position she holds. I obviously do not know for sure, but unfortunately partisanship enters the perception of what happened in almost every public issue, such as the housing crisis, and this could be another case. I suspect you need to be liberal to receive the awards as listed below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheila_Bair

"Bair has received many awards, including the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award and Hubert H. Humphrey Civil Rights Award."


Okay, now go ahead and try and perform a character assassination against all the other economists linked in the post I gave ya. Go ahead! Do whatever you can to avoid actually admitting that you are wrong on this issue, in large part because you did zero actual research into it before bringing it up.

**Tsk tsk, you tried to erase your response, but I saw it anyway.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:55 am
@Cycloptichorn,
I was looking at the NPR website, trying to find something else, and I came across the article I linked to.
If that bothers you, you will get over it.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:58 am
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

I was looking at the NPR website, trying to find something else, and I came across the article I linked to.
If that bothers you, you will get over it.


I suppose that's accurate enough. It doesn't bother me, I was just asking.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Paddle
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 12:32 pm
I saw there's a "Republican" and "Democrat" thread here... where the hell is the "Libertarian" thread?
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:25 pm
Quote:
Date: 10/28/2010 2:54:08 PM
Subject: Democrat Civil War – part 1of 6

Dear Rush,
It’s my great hope that some of your listeners find a way to get this letter to you, or that it makes it to “Snerdley” and finds its way into your hands. I don’t think even you understand just how much damage Obama has done to the Democrat Party — to the point where formerly lifelong Democrats like myself, and everyone here at HillBuzz.org, are actively working to expose the party and literally burn it to the ground for the good of the country.
None of this is being reported in the media, but a Civil War in the Democrat ranks has been raging since May 31st, 2008…a date every Hillary Clinton supporter knows well, because that was the date of the Democrat Rules & Bylaws Committee Meeting where Howard Dean (then-DNC Chair), Donna Brazile, and scores of other Kool-Aid slurping Obama flunkies took off their masks and revealed the full extent of the Leftist coup that had taken over the party. This was the day when the DNC took delegates Hillary Clinton won in Michigan away from her and handed them to Obama (despite the fact he wasn’t even on the primary ballot in that state, because he removed his name when his campaign realized he’d come in third in that race).
May 31st, 2008 was a day when Hillary “babes” (as you call us sometimes) like us flew to Washington in large numbers to stand outside the Marriott near the National Zoo, where this Rules & Bylaws Committee Meeting was held, to shout for the DNC to count all the votes and operate the nominating process fairly — but they refused. The anger over that day has never abated. In fact, it’s grown considerably since then.
This was the determining factor in millions of us leaving the Democrat Party for good. This was the day when the P.U.M.A. movement began — in response to Donna Brazile’s calls for “party unity” following the Rules & Bylaws Committee Meeting, we “Hillary babes” said “Party Unity My A$$” (or People United Means Action, depending on how you want to phrase it). Exit polls showed 8 million PUMA voted Republican for the first time in our lives in the fall of 2008…casting ballots for McCain/Palin (and in truth, mainly for Palin, whom we support, and not to a small degree because she receives many of the same attacks lobbed at Hillary Clinton all these years).
You seem to know most of all this, so I’ll end the history lesson by noting the people alienated by the Democrat Party during the primaries in 2008 — where it was clear the party and the media colluded at great lengths to push Obama while hammering Hillary Clinton into the ground — never came back to the Democrat Party.
This is also when most of us stopped using the term “Democratic Party”, since there’s nothing “democratic” about these people. They are the “Democrat Party”, and even that is hard to acknowledge because they really and truly have proved themselves to be enemies of real democracy.
I’m still registered as a Democrat here in Chicago (because the Cocktail Party GOP establishment so disgusts me I can’t will myself to party-ID Republican, and there’s no Independent option here in Illinois) but I can’t imagine ever voting for another Democrat again, as long as I live. To Hell with Democrats. This was solidified for me on Christmas Eve of last year, when Democrats rushed Obamacare through the Senate in the dead of night, through various secret channels, and every single Democrat voted for its passage (even supposed moderates like Evan Bayh in Indiana, who quickly realized his vote would cost him re-election…so the coward retired rather then face angry voters over what he did). I just don’t believe Democrats should be given elected office by voters because they cannot be trusted to even read bills before they vote on them, not even when said bills seek to permanently alter the entire American economy. This is reckless and reprehensible to the point of treason.
I was a Democrat for 32 years before the heavy-handed push for Obama alienated me from the party…and I borrow what Hillary Clinton said about Republicans once, back when she was a Goldwater Girl, and will paraphrase by saying that I didn’t leave the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party left me.
After it beat me to a pulp, called me a racist, berated and insulted me, and used Alinsky Rules to hit me with everything it had. Not just me, but all Hillary supporters.
This is the part I don’t think you understand because I don’t know if you and your listeners paid much attention to what the Obama campaign and DNC did to malign and assault Hillary Clinton’s supporters during the 2008 campaign. None of this has been forgotten by any of us.
If you have not seen it already, Rush, you need to watch Gigi Gaston’s documentary “We Will Not Be Silenced 2008″. I’m featured in a segment on the voter fraud that was committed in the Iowa Caucus back in January of 2008. While I was always aware Democrats use unions and other means to cheat in elections, I never knew the Democrat Party was capable of the large-scale, aggressive, unapologetic fraud it committed on Obama’s behalf all through 2008. In Iowa, I watched Obama’s ACORN and SEIU goons push and shove old people, bully them, and intimidate them when they wanted to vote for Hillary Clinton. I saw scores of Illinois license plates fill the parking lots outside caucus locations, with Chicagoland Obama supporters illegally entering the Caucus sites to vote for Obama and game Iowa for him. Having planned ahead, Obama supporters actually RAN those caucus sites, and held the doors open for all these fraudulent voters to walk right in, without being asked for IDs, where they then took control of the caucuses and bullied the Iowa residents into supporting Obama — lest they be called RAAACISTS! out in the open in front of their friends and neighbors in those open-air caucuses.
The media has never talked about this. I don’t remember ever hearing you talk about it. But one of the biggest reasons the Democrats are in the trouble they’re in right now is because of how frequently the Left and the media (one and the same, really) called anyone who opposed Obama a RAAACIST. If you supported Hillary Clinton in the primaries instead of Obama, you were called a RAAACIST. If you were someone like me who fundraised for Hillary, who hosted events for her, who put yourself out there and wrote columns advocating her or did media spots talking up her candidacy, you were aggressively targeted by the Obama campaign and his supporters…relentlessly attacked as a RAAACIST! and assaulted with the Alinksy Rules for Radicals in hopes of breaking your spirit, terrorizing you, and making you abandon Clinton for fear of having these people destroy your life, ruin your business, and make you an absolute pariah in your community.
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:27 pm
Quote:
Date: 10/28/2010 2:54:08 PM
Subject: Democrat Civil War – part 2 of 6

This is what the Obama campaign, the media, and the DNC did to DEMOCRATS.
For almost a year, the Obama zealots and the Left waged all-out-war not just on Hillary Clinton, but on lifelong, loyal, dyed-in-the-wool Democrat voters like me. This came straight from the top, from Obama himself. Both he and his wife Michelle called the Clintons racists. Obama’s surrogates like James Clyburne, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, John Lewis, and others called Geraldine Ferraro, Madeline Albright, and others racists. The Obamas toxified the South Carolina primary, in particular, with foul race-baiting and turned North Carolina and Indiana into racial powder kegs by ramping up accusations that anyone not supporting Obama was a vile racist that needed to be pounded into the ground.
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, my former Congresswoman back home in Cleveland, was a black Hillary Clinton supporter to the very end — and she was called a “race-traitor”, an “Aunt Jane”, and all manner of worse names as she was bullied, berated, and verbally assaulted by the Obama team…because she was black and dared to stand with her friend Hillary Clinton, the person Tubbs Jones knew would make a better president than “The One”. To her dying day in August of 2008, Tubbs Jones was threatened by the Obama campaign and told she’d be primaried in 2010 and kicked to the curb for being a “race-traitor”. She died of a brain aneurysm while driving her car, and Obama supporters filled Daily Kos, DemocratUnderground, and other George Soros-supported sites with lies about her drunk driving, doing drugs, and other slurs because even after she died these people wouldn’t stop hating her for daring to be an outspoken black woman who would never abandon Hillary for Obama.
This is similar to the grief that I’ve received here in Chicago for being a gay Hillary former Democrat in Boystown who never drank any Kool-Aid, never stopped speaking out against Obama, and who recently fully came out as a conservative — in the face of the same kind of Alinsky-grade, identity-based, “traitor” hectoring that Tubbs Jones got for being a black woman who didn’t kneel before the Obama altar.
Well, Rush, let me just tell you, from personal experience, that the tens of millions of people relentlessly abused and hounded by Obama supporters (remember that back in 2008 he urged his followers to “get in their faces” and “confront their neighbors” if they weren’t drinking his unicorn-pumped sparkly Kool-Aid ) will NEVER EVER FORGET what the Obama campaign directed at them, in terms of all this Alinsky bullying.
To quote Jeremiah Wright, the man Obama spent twenty years eagerly listening to at Trinity United Church of Christ: somebody’s chickens have now come back to roost.
During the campaign, Donna Brazile famously said that the Democrat Party no longer needed the people Obama once described as “bitter, religion-and-guns-clinging, Midwesterners”. Brazile took this further and said, outright, that the Democrat party did not need blue-collar white voters, the Jacksonian voters, the Hillary voters, because the party was “Obamafied” and would win elections for generations with the Obama coalition of blacks, Leftist elites, Hispanics, low information gay voters, and self-hating Jews.
This is all the Democrats have left, Rush.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:29 pm
@ican711nm,
I was wondering how long it would take for you to get this bullshit sent to you in your email.

It's amazing how low the bar is for acceptance amongst Conservatives.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:31 pm
Quote:
Date: 10/28/2010 2:54:08 PM
Subject: Democrat Civil War – part 3 of 6

Speaking from personal experience, as someone who has worked in fundraising for over 10 years and who has been a part of every presidential campaign since 1992, the Democrats have permanently alienated tens of millions of people who normally turned out reliably every year not just to vote Democrat, but also to write checks and otherwise participate in campaigns.
No more. Never again.
Here in Chicago, just about everyone who was part of Team Hillary efforts with me on the ground has completely divorced themselves from the Democrat Party. Being called a racist repeatedly and hearing from Donna Brazile that we are not needed will do that to a person.
But in a bigger sense, Democrats, by being so shameless and aggressive with the voter fraud in 2008 have opened too many eyes for us to ever go back to pretending that fraud and corrupt practices aren’t the hallmark of the Democrat Party.
There was a show on ABC a few years ago called Alias starring Jennifer Garner in which she played a woman working for a company called Credit Dauphine…which she was told was a front for a CIA organization called SD6. Garner’s character, Sidney Bristow, carried out her missions for SD6, overlooking different things the organization did that she might not have liked, because she thought she was doing what was best for the country. And then, one day, Sidney learned SD6 was actually an enemy of America…that it’s real mission was to destroy the country…that everything Sidney was told about SD6 was a lie. The mask came off SD6, and Sidney Bristow realized she had to work aggressively to take the whole enterprise down.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:33 pm
Quote:
Date: 10/28/2010 2:54:08 PM
Subject: Democrat Civil War – part 4 of 6

Rush (and his listeners), please hear me on this because you will not read this in the media — but just about every one of us from the Hillary 2008 campaign is a Sidney Bristow today.
Those of us who worked Democrat campaigns in the past put up with union associations and the other unsavory aspects of being a Democrat because we were told this was the only way Democrats could win…with union muscle. But, in 2008 the Democrats revealed themselves to be an SD6 conglomeration of every force in this country that wants to bring America down, tank our economy, usurp our Constitution, and lay waste to the American way of life.
Democrats took off the mask. The DNC reveled in being fully Leftist-controlled. Crazy people unapologetic in their Communist admiration took over positions of great influence not just in the DNC, but in our state and federal governments as well.
I’m horrified by that.
Hillary supporters are horrified by that.
And we have not sat back quietly to allow this to happen without a fight.
I know for a fact that people I worked with on the Hillary 2008 campaign have been actively working against every single Democrat who supported Obama’s nomination. Everyone who backstabbed Hillary Clinton is being undermined and sabotaged by people who might still be registered as Democrats but have no more loyalty to the party. Sometimes, conservative sites try to make this into a “sour grapes” sort of “Hillary’s revenge” meme — and there might be a taste of this in what’s going on — but the real driving force is that we former Democrats saw just how insane these people really are and we are now doing everything we can, behind the scenes, to use everything we know about the Democrat Party to collapse it from within.
If you think about it logically, there is not enough energy to sustain a years-long drive to remove Obama supporters from office just because people are still upset Hillary Clinton was not the 2008 nominee and is not president today. Sometimes, I think even you believe this is what this is all about. Your “Reverse Operation Chaos” initiative seems predicated on this, but that belief is apocryphal in that it misses a few big marks.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 01:35 pm
Quote:
Date: 10/28/2010 2:54:08 PM
Subject: Democrat Civil War – part 5 of 6

This is and it isn’t about Hillary.
What it’s really about is what the Democrat Party did to Hillary that alienated tens of millions of Jacksonian/Clintonian/middleclass Americans from the party permanently — and this includes what the party and Obama campaign did to Hillary’s supporters themselves (ie, calling them racists, telling them they weren’t wanted, calling them bitter clingers, etc.).
For the first time in our lives, so many of us former Democrats were given an Alinsky taste of what the Democrat Party really stand for…what it really believes…and how it really feels about America, our Constitution, our economy, and our way of life.
Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Obama took the mask off the Democrat Party…and the Leftist gorgon that lurked beneath is something America-loving, middleclass, Jacksonian/Clintonian Democrats want nothing to do with.
As part of your “Reverse Operation Chaos”, you really need to emphasize something the media just won’t talk about — and that’s the simple fact that even if you called yourself a Democrat for 32 years, the way I did, because everyone you grew up with and everyone in your family was a Democrat, that in 2010 it’s time to ask yourselves what that really means.
Do you want to be in a party that calls people racists for stepping out of line and voicing opposition to the socialist lurch of the current administration?
Do you condone voter fraud and the shameless, undemocratic tactics employed by Democrats?
Do you wish to associate with the likes of ACORN, the SEIU, the Black Panthers, and all the other thugs, goons, and degenerates the Obama campaign and White House employ as the DNC’s muscle on the ground?
It is crystal clear that being a patriotic American who loves this country is intellectually incompatible with being a Democrat. If you love America and want it to prosper, the Democrat Party is at absolute odds with everything we need for a thriving, successful economy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1831
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 03/20/2025 at 07:03:31