@okie,
okie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:There's nothing meaningful in this paragraph to respond to. Instead, I'll point out that you have failed to respond to several posts I've made in the last few days which show that your attempts to blame the government for the Foreclosure crisis are completely incorrect, both logically and factually.
When presented with this evidence and argumentation, you simply don't answer the posts. How do you reconcile this with your accusation that I am the one in a 'cocoon?'
Cycloptichorn
Sorry about not responding, but my life does not revolve around A2K. If you really need to know, I have been on the road for the past week and it has not been convenient to spend time with the laptop to post here. I haven't gone back to read all of your posts about that yet, but suffice it say that I am certainly not alone in my assessment. I have posted before the fact that a very respected owner of a bank around here spoke in an interview about it and he linked it all back to the CRA. He has owned the bank for a very long time, and they are one of the most healthy banks around. If you wish to place trust in who is saying something, I would trust what he says, because he knows much more about it than I do, or you do.
I don't place trust in anyone's opinion; I place trust in factual analysis. Your supposed banker friend could be right or wrong completely and you'd have no clue, because rather than do your own homework on this issue (which is hard) you instead decide to believe him because he told you something you want to hear: basically, that the Democrats are responsible for all the harms of the world.
That's intellectually lazy and not something to be proud of. What more, in this case it is actively embarassing you, as you keep posting things which simply are not supported by the facts. I submit that you have no knowledge at all of how the CRA operates, what the requirements for banks to operate under it are, or how CRA loans affected the financial crisis, if at all. Yet you come here and pontificate about it as if you do, and when called on it, you don't respond with facts but with insults and Appeals to Authority - if you respond at all.
Take your time to research the CRA and respond on this issue; I'll wait.
Quote:I also trust far more what conservatives and most Republicans say about this, over Democrats, because I see the hypocrisy of Democrats on the economy and housing issue. To this day, I see nothing, absolutely nothing, has been done about the Fannie and Freddie corruption. Yes, corruption. Face it, cyclops.
You don't actually give a **** about corruption, so why pretend like you do? For years you never said a single word about corrupt politicians - when it was Bush and his cronies giving giant contracts to their buddies, or Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay running the House like a giant cash register. You didn't care then and you don't now. You only like attacking Democrats, because it's easier to lob allegations than it is to research complex subjects and form a narrative based on facts.
Cycloptichorn