Obama '08?

Hello,

I'm Marsha Farney, the Republican candidate for the State Board of Education, district 10.

I wanted to make you aware of an outrageous phone poll going on in the Austin area. Because I attended the Williamson County Tea Party event in July, either my opponent or her supporters are sponsoring a phone poll asking people if they would support Dr. Marsha Farney if they knew I attended a white supremacist event (referring to the Tea Party event I attended in July in Georgetown). So, apparently, Tea Party people are now considered "white supremacist." What an insult. When I was at the Tea Party event I only saw good, patriotic people who were concerned about the direction of their country.

Here is a link to an article rebuking this latest slander against me for attending a Tea Party event and against Tea Party members.

http://wilcoconservative.blogspot.com/2010/08/desperate-democrats-smear-marsha-farney.html

Help me spread the word that liberals are attacking candidates who attend and support Tea Party events as well as Tea Party members with this latest unfounded and scandalous attack.

Please know I appreciate your support and all the good work the Tea Party does for America. Keep me in your prayers as I continue to work to win this race and put an experienced educator and conservative Republican on the SBOE.

Thanks again.

Marsha Farney

Candidate for State Board of Education

www.marshafarney.com

Leftist Liberals are followers of Saul Alinsky. Consequently, they believe:

The radical is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer;

The radical is building his own kingdom, a kingdom of heaven on earth;

The revolutionary’s purpose is to undermine the system by taking from the HAVES and giving it to the HAVENOTS and then see what happens;

The most basic principle for radicals is lie to opponents and disarm them by pretending to be moderates and liberals;

"The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution."The stated cause is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause which is accumulation of power to make the revolution;

The radical organizer does not have a fixed truth—truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing. He is a political relativist;

I do not follow Saul Alinsky. I have never read any of his writings nor I have participated in discussions about him.

Saul Alinsky said and wrote:
->The radical is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer;
->The revolutionary’s purpose is to undermine the system;
->The radical is building his own kingdom, a kingdom of heaven on earth;
->The radical underrmines the system by taking from the haves and giving it to the have nots;
->The most basic principle for radicals is lie to opponents;
->The issue is never the issue;
->The issue is always the revolution;
->The radical organizer does not have a fixed truth—truth to him is relative and changing;
->The stated cause is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause;
->The real cause is the accumulation of power to make the revolution.

based on your actions and your knowledge of Saul Alinsky, I think we can pretty clearly state that you are a disciple of his ican.

Rightist Conservatives seek more individual control over their own lives.

Rightist Conservatives regularly specify what Rightist Conservatives think.

Leftist Liberals regularly incorrectly claim what Rightist Conservatives think.
Rightist Conservatives regularly correctly claim what Leftist Liberals think.

Quote:

Rightist Conservatives seek more individual control over their own lives.

Thats why they want to legislate their form of morality in the bedroom, definitions of associations, and they wish to remove the wall between church and state.

farmerman wrote:

Quote:

Rightist Conservatives seek more individual control over their own lives.

Thats why they want to legislate their form of morality in the bedroom, definitions of associations, and they wish to remove the wall between church and state.

Hmmm, funny you say that. Is it Democrats or Republicans that have instituted the teaching of Islam in schools now, farmer?

You might want to research this out a bit, cyclops. I don't think this would be pushed by conservative Republicans. Somehow I would doubt that. It is probably allowed or promoted by liberals wanting to be politically correct.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=38269

'Five pillars of Islam' taught in public school

His comments came after a new protest arose in Nyssa, Ore., where one parent raised objections when the Islamic teachings came to light. The district there, according to Supt. Don Grotting, is teaching a chapter in a history textbook "Journey Across Time" that talks about "how civilization has developed and some of the particular aspects of Islam."

"We teach out of the book, and there are some supplemental class activities," he told WND. "The kids do some skits, they could bring a food from the region, you could build a prop that would have depicted (something) maybe during that time period.

"If you wanted to you could dress up (as a Muslim) for extra credit," he said.

He said students also learned about the climate of the Middle East, the food and everyday activities of Islam, and the geography and the lay of the land.

Still another assignment was to learn the "five pillars" of Islam, study Ramadan and listen to guest speakers including an American Muslim who arrived dressed in her religious costume to talk to the kids about her Quran.