okie
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 04:31 pm
sozobe wrote:
Did anyone ever say it wouldn't get down and dirty?

Do you mean from Obama's side, though? That's where the fact that he had nothing to do with the creation of the ad becomes significant.

Well, when I predicted Hillary would be digging up dirty laundry and planting it in the media, and I reminded everyone about the FBI files, although I don't know if she and Bill reviewed Obama's file, anyway I was met with some skepticism, I believe it was Snood in particular. In regard to Obama, I do not perceive him to be ruthless in the mold of a Hillary, and he truly might be a nice guy, I do not yet know much about him, but I don't know if he is fully aware of what all he will have to fight before this is all over, in terms of the Clintonistas bag of tricks, and we do not yet know how this will all play out. I would like to see him beat Hillary soundly and completely, but beyond that, he has a very liberal voting record, so the general election is a completely different ballgame.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 04:40 pm
Quote:
I do not perceive him to be ruthless in the mold of a Hillary


None of the other dems even come close to Hillary, you're right about that.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 04:48 pm
You guys accuse Hillary of having a bag of dirty tricks. Yet the only one so far has been from the Obama camp. OH! that's right he did not have anything to do with it.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 05:28 pm
Oh! that's right... Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 05:58 pm
Smile Sozobe. Look where the latest time poll puts Obama in the General. Shocked
http://pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 06:43 pm
:-D
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 12:43 am
sozobe wrote:
:-D

They also see him catching up fast against Clinton. It's 34:26 now.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 05:04 am
Fewer pledge allegiance to the GOP
Quote:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-shift23mar23,0,195804.story?coll=la-home-headlines
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 05:57 am
blatham wrote:
Fewer pledge allegiance to the GOP

Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:29 am
Thomas wrote:
Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.

Whats that supposed to mean, Thomas? Does it include abortion sanctioned and paid for by government is hunky dory?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:34 am
You make some peculiar jumps, okie.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:34 am
okie wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.

Whats that supposed to mean, Thomas? Does it include abortion sanctioned and paid for by government is hunky dory?


Don't be ridiculous.

It means that responsible, sensible Republicans who want classic conservative values at home AND in terms of our foreign policy, take the reigns back from the current Cult of Personality which runs your party.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:34 am
The foul smell of Bush and the republican dominated congress will permeate from the republican party for years to come. It will be difficult to get rid of that stink.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:57 am
ehBeth wrote:
You make some peculiar jumps, okie.

I was merely responding to Thomas's stink bomb comment that implies that more liberal thinking is more "grownup." I read the implications, make a comment, and I am accused of a peculiar jump, when Thomas made the jump.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:59 am
But he didn't say anything about more liberal. How do you know it's not stuff like finally rein in spending and be more fiscally responsible?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 09:59 am
au1929 wrote:
The foul smell of Bush and the republican dominated congress will permeate from the republican party for years to come. It will be difficult to get rid of that stink.


The foulest smell coming out of government these days, in my opinion, is the Leahys, Clintons, Ted Kennedys, Pelosi, Reid, Durbin and like minded people.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 10:01 am
sozobe wrote:
But he didn't say anything about more liberal. How do you know it's not stuff like finally rein in spending and be more fiscally responsible?

Did I say I knew for sure? I only suspect what I put in my question. He hasn't answered the question yet.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 10:38 am
Thomas wrote:
blatham wrote:
Fewer pledge allegiance to the GOP

Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.


This move is in the right direction, but I'm not sure that much optimism re the party is merited. At least, not for a significant time period. The sort of shift this polling (and earlier) mirrors is pulling along the independents particularly. Further revelations (inevitable) of corruption, deceits, etc will help the trend. Electoral consequences will put a big boost behind the dynamics for change.

But, the internal resistance to change will be significant not merely in terms of emotional investment (eg many of the folks here) but also in terms of structural factors. The various things I've been reading over the last decade suggest that the 'feeder lines' into the party machinery are preponderantly of the 'new conservative' sort. Likewise at the community and state level party organizations. All of this did, after all, work very well for a good period of time.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 10:39 am
blatham wrote:
Thomas wrote:
blatham wrote:
Fewer pledge allegiance to the GOP

Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.


This move is in the right direction, but I'm not sure that much optimism re the party is merited. At least, not for a significant time period. The sort of shift this polling (and earlier) mirrors is pulling along the independents particularly. Further revelations (inevitable) of corruption, deceits, etc will help the trend. Electoral consequences will put a big boost behind the dynamics for change.

But, the internal resistance to change will be significant not merely in terms of emotional investment (eg many of the folks here) but also in terms of structural factors. The various things I've been reading over the last decade suggest that the 'feeder lines' into the party machinery are preponderantly of the 'new conservative' sort. Likewise at the community and state level party organizations. All of this did, after all, work very well for a good period of time.


John Dean is writing a new book about this question, which I believe all the candidates should be asked:

"Just how much power do you believe the position you are running for, has?"

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 23 Mar, 2007 10:43 am
okie wrote:
I was merely responding to Thomas's stink bomb comment that implies that more liberal thinking is more "grownup."


he didn't say anything like that

Thomas wrote:
I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.


~~~~~~~

Your transcription of that to
okie wrote:
Does it include abortion sanctioned and paid for by government is hunky dory?
was/is peculiar.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 173
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.02 seconds on 08/02/2025 at 04:29:58