plainoldme
 
  0  
Sat 19 Jun, 2010 09:42 pm
@okie,
Talk all you want. No one reads your posts all the way through as they are mind-numbingly boring. You never take corrections either. You live in a bubble of unreality.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Sat 19 Jun, 2010 09:47 pm
@Advocate,
One of our local papers ran an interview with Rachel Maddow several weeks ago in which she said that today's liberal position is where the Republican party was in the 1950s. According to Dr. Maddow, a Rhodes scholar with a doctorate in politics from Oxford, the rest of the nation drifted very far to the right. Ah, how long will it take some of the right-wing rabid conservatives here to scream that leftism is deviance? How long will it take some of the great unwashed to begin criticizing Oxford as a bastion of communism?
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 10:22 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
I'm sorry, but, you have done nothing but demonstrate childish behavior and a totally unschooled intellect. Why do you expect to be taken seriously?

In other words you cannot rationally refute my claims:
People For the American Way have been lying about the Right, and Conservatives in particular, for years;
They, and now the Odem too, continue to emulate Saul Alinsky's sick behavior and practice his sick doctrines.

The mentor of those who mentored Barack Obama when he was a community organizer in Chicago, was Saul Alinsky, who in his books, Reveille for Radicals, and Rules for Radicals, wrote:
*Radicals should be "political relativists." and should take an agnostic view of means and ends;
*The most basic principle for radicals is lie to opponents and disarm them by pretending to be moderates and liberals;
*The radical organizer does not have a fixed truth—truth to him is relative and changing;
*Radicals are not virtuous by not wanting power, because power is good and powerlessness is evil;
*Life is a corrupting process;
*He who fears corruption fears life;
*The radical is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer;
*The radical is building his own kingdom;
*The radical’s purpose is to undermine the system by taking from the haves and giving it to the have-nots;
*The stated cause is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause;
*The real cause is accumulation of power to make the revolution;
*The standard of the revolution is a democracy which upends all social hierarchies, including those based on merit.

These Odem rotters, if ultimately allowed to be successful, will destroy the rest of the human race as well as themselves.
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 10:37 am
@ican711nm,
Telling me, "In other words you cannot rationally refute my claims," is a fifth-grade level defense. Again, you have countered a charge of behaving childishly by behaving childishly.
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 01:52 pm
Quote:
Judicial Watch Files Complaint re: Obama White House “Bribery Scandals”

According to a recent Fox News poll, a majority of Americans believe there should be an independent investigation into a scheme by White House officials to influence federal elections in Pennsylvania and Colorado.

So does Judicial Watch. That’s why this week we filed an official complaint with the Office of Special Counsel specifically requesting an investigation into violations of the Hatch Act by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina.

As I noted in two recent installments of the Weekly Update, Emanuel and Messina allegedly attempted to manipulate Senate elections in Pennsylvania and Colorado respectively by offering federal appointments to Rep. Joe Sestak and Andrew Romanoff in order to persuade the Senate candidates to abandon their campaigns.

Here’s a quick excerpt from our complaint, filed on June 15, 2010:
As widely reported in the media, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and deputy chief of staff Jim Messina, on behalf of the Obama Administration, have both used their position and influence as highly placed federal employees to affect the outcome of federal elections in direct violation of the Hatch Act, which states that an employee may not “use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.”

According to the Fox News poll, overall, 12% believe the Obama White House officials broke the law while 40% believe they acted unethically. I would expect those numbers to go up significantly if an independent investigation commences and we learn all of the facts.
Because what we have learned so far is disturbing.

On May 27, 2009, Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak indicated in an interview with CNN that he intended to challenge Senator Arlen Specter in the 2010 Democratic Primary. According to a White House memo authored by White House Counsel Robert Bauer, “efforts were made in June and July of 2009 to determine whether Congressman Sestak would be interested in service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board, which would avoid a divisive Senate primary.”

...

The memo further notes that Emanuel enlisted the help of former President Bill Clinton “to raise the executive branch positions with Congressman Sestak.” Sestak rebuffed the Obama White House offers and defeated Specter in the primary.

Regarding Andrew Romanoff, the Colorado Independent reported on August 29, 2009, that Romanoff planned to challenge Colorado Democratic Senator Steve Bennet in the 2010 Democratic primary. According to The Washington Post, Messina allegedly called Romanoff on September 11, 2009, and suggested that Romanoff’s time might be better spent working for the U.S. Agency for International Development instead of running for the Senate.
Romanoff released to the press an email from Messina dated that same day listing three jobs that “would be available” if Romanoff were not running for the Senate against Bennet. Two of them were with USAID and the other was the position of director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency. Romanoff rebuffed the Obama White House offers and defeated Bennet in the primary.

Top Obama White House officials attempted to manipulate federal elections in at least two states, which is a clear violation of the law. They must be held accountable. And an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel is a good first step.

If you’ve been following the news coverage on these scandals, you’ll see the tone has changed substantially. The liberal media rallied to protect the Obama White House, trying to convince us that this is all just “business as usual” in Washington, DC. This city’s corrupt establishment has decided that serious allegations of criminal conduct by top officials of the White House take a back seat to the effort to destroy BP in order to protect Obama’s poll numbers.

It is an absolute disgrace that Attorney General Holder has not appointed a special counsel to investigate these scandals. Congress, meanwhile, has remained largely silent on this serious Obama scandal — with notable exceptions such as Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), who also filed an OSC complaint. No wonder the public holds the institution in such low esteem.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 01:55 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Telling me, "In other words you cannot rationally refute my claims," is a fifth-grade level defense. Again, you have countered a charge of behaving childishly by behaving childishly.

Telling me that instead of making a rational rebuttal is evidence of incompetence!
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 02:11 pm
@plainoldme,
pom, I see you're still playing hopscotch with ican; childish behavior is when both attempt to continue their same argument over and over without any resolution - or hope for resolution. Just wondering how much longer you're going to play this children's game?
maporsche
 
  2  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 02:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I don't know what you're looking at CI...all I'm see is the following. It makes A2K much easier to read and enjoy.

The only downside is that sometimes I have entire pages without a single post I want to read. But it's a minor inconvenience.

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)

User ignored (view)
Irishk
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 02:38 pm
@maporsche,
That visual made me laugh out loud. Laughing
(And, not a bad idea, btw)
0 Replies
 
Irishk
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 03:55 pm
Obama's College Apartment On The Market

The New York apartment President Barack Obama inhabited while he was a student at Columbia University is available for rent at $1,900 a month. Here are some other pieces of Obama's past you can buy or rent:

Box of Playboy magazines filled with notes in the articles' margins—$125

Bar napkin on which he plotted out his entire presidency—$340

Garter belts from Rocky Horror Frank-N-Furter costume—$3,000

First mix tape ever made by Barack, featuring Kool and the Gang, James
Taylor—$55,000

Hastily scribbled list of pros and cons of dating Michelle Obama—$300,000

Birthday card from Weather Underground—$125,000

First draft of his iconic 2008 campaign poster bearing the phrase "Positive Expectation" instead of "Hope"—$25,000

Complete set of Treasury bonds he created in 2009—$1.4 trillion
plainoldme
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 05:24 pm
@ican711nm,
No, I think you are in your second childhood. There is no point in wasting time on someone whose lack of historical and political knowledge is as profound as your lack. Beyond your slogans, you are a void.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 05:25 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I appreciate that you addressed me rather than him.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 05:26 pm
@Irishk,
Did this list of articles come from The Onion?
plainoldme
 
  1  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 05:27 pm
@plainoldme,
It did! You can always tell when The Onion has its hand in something!
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  2  
Sun 20 Jun, 2010 05:51 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

No, I think you are in your second childhood. There is no point in wasting time on someone whose lack of historical and political knowledge is as profound as your lack. Beyond your slogans, you are a void.


yet another example of projection from the harpie of A2K.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Mon 21 Jun, 2010 12:08 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
No, I think you are in your second childhood. There is no point in wasting time on someone whose lack of historical and political knowledge is as profound as your lack. Beyond your slogans, you are a void.

Poor baby!

You continue to appear unable to make a rational rebuttal.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Mon 21 Jun, 2010 12:16 pm
POM, the right here obviously cannot handle your truth. Thus, they have joined in personally attacking you.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Mon 21 Jun, 2010 01:44 pm


POM wouldn't know the truth if it came up and bit her fat liberal ass.
Advocate
 
  2  
Mon 21 Jun, 2010 02:01 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



POM wouldn't know the truth if it came up and bit her fat liberal ass.


Coming from you, that is really rich. You are among the biggest BS artists in A2K, and that is quite an accomplishment.
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Mon 21 Jun, 2010 02:13 pm
@Advocate,



You really should focus more time and attention on improving yourself, you are in no position to concern yourself with others.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1693
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/10/2025 at 11:52:43