Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 12:29 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

okie wrote:

Questions again for any liberal. So far, none can muster the spine to answer them. Cyclops started to try, but pretty much faded out, when asked for details.


I didn't 'fade out;' I answered all the questions you asked of me.

Not satisfactorily. You admit you are to the left of Obama, in your opinion, but the last question I posed - assuming Obama was in fact a Marxist at heart, on the scale of 0 to 10, how concerned would you be? I do not recall an answer.


With 0 being lowest, I'm concerned at a level of 0.

Quote:
Quote:
Which, I should point out, are stupid questions to begin with, loaded questions which serve nothing more than to forward your idiotic viewpoint that Obama is some sort of 'socialist,' when his actions make perfectly clear that he is not.

Stupid questions according to you, because you are uncomfortable in answering them, you are put on the spot and challenged to openly answer the questions honestly.


Have I shown any discomfort or reluctance to answer your questions? At all? Ever?

Quote:
An open and honest person that is proud of their political beliefs should have no problem answering them. In fact, many many people believe Obama is "some sort of extreme socialist,"


Only right-wingers like yourself who don't know what they are talking about. You've pretty much shown that you don't understand the difference between Socialism and leftist policy; you just lump them both together, because it's convenient for you to make boogeymen out of your opponents that way. You use the word 'radical' and 'fascist' the same way: like a high-school debater, big on accusations, little on understanding.

Quote:
and so this gives you the chance to disagree with that, and to defend your reasons with valid evidence. I am merely asking for an honest answer, to try to better understand where you stand politically, and why. The questions I ask are immensely pertinent, and they are questions that every responsible voter should be able to answer.


Quote:
Quote:
you persist in this because you have a deep-seated insecurity about Obama, and feel the need to express it through constant condemnations of him.

Cycloptichorn

I have no deepseated insecurity


Yes you do. You display it constantly. It's quite obvious that you are centered around tearing the guy down, because you fear him.

Quote:
but call it what you want, I do openly and honestly confess that I have a deep seated distrust of Obama, a man that I perceive as having never been open and honest about his true political beliefs. However I am beginning to more and more see this trait as a trait that is common to extreme leftists, it is difficult to get the full and honest answers out of them. The example of my questions not being answered at all or incompletely here, that is a great example of that trait.


I have answered every question you asked, fully. So it's truly dishonest for you to say that 'leftists' don't answer questions or are not proud of their beliefs.

Cycloptichorn
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 12:37 pm
The Obama administration is locked into a perpetual campaign mode and one tactic is to say
whatever they think opponents want to hear... this includes lying about any and everything.

You will notice this tactic when they stand in front of a TV camera and profess that they are not
or will never do a certain thing knowing full well that they are and will do what they say they won't.

The Obama administration is using Smoke & Mirrors and Slight of Hand to hide the truth.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 12:46 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Quote:
"...assuming Obama was in fact a Marxist at heart,...


This describes okie's mental fix; he uses words like "assuming" followed by "in fact..." to show there is no other choice.

It's entertaining that Cyclo wishes to answer his silly questions that he knows the answer to.

Cyclo, He's asking you "assuming it's a fact..."

0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 01:22 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Did you read the bill?
From the way its worded, it could include any water on my property, including the artificial pond I had built.
Since when is what I do on my land the govts business?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 01:28 pm
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

Did you read the bill?
From the way its worded, it could include any water on my property, including the artificial pond I had built.
Since when is what I do on my land the govts business?


Since the water which is on your land seeps into the groundwater, which seeps into the drinking water. You don't have the right to be a polluter, even on your own property, because you cannot contain that pollution. Actions you take on your own land which impact other people most certainly are the government's business.

Think about the rest of us, hey.

Cycloptichorn
Advocate
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 01:58 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

The Obama administration is locked into a perpetual campaign mode and one tactic is to say
whatever they think opponents want to hear... this includes lying about any and everything.

You will notice this tactic when they stand in front of a TV camera and profess that they are not
or will never do a certain thing knowing full well that they are and will do what they say they won't.

The Obama administration is using Smoke & Mirrors and Slight of Hand to hide the truth.


Could you provide some examples of this lying, etc., by Obama. I have not seen this at all. I suggest you check out Boehner and Cantor for some big-time lying, quibbling, etc.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:11 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

Did you read the bill?
From the way its worded, it could include any water on my property, including the artificial pond I had built.
Since when is what I do on my land the govts business?


Since the water which is on your land seeps into the groundwater, which seeps into the drinking water. You don't have the right to be a polluter, even on your own property, because you cannot contain that pollution. Actions you take on your own land which impact other people most certainly are the government's business.


All of the water on this planet has been used by a human at least once and water recognizes no geographical boundaries.
It is ludicrous for anyone to believe the US government is interested in protecting the water citizens drink.
This new bill is all about controlling an element (H2O) that you and I can't live without for more than a few days.
Water is more precious to life on earth than oil and the US government wants total control over it's use and distribution.
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:24 pm
@sozobe,
Did anyone see the great Obama interview on The Colbert Report last night?
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/259281/december-14-2009/exclusive---extended-interview-with-barack-obama

So very substantial and riveting!
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:25 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:



Could you provide some examples of this lying, etc., by Obama. I have not seen this at all.


Are you saying you believe every claim and promise Obama and his ilk have made since the campaign began?

Are you saying Obama and his ilk have been honest about everything... every issue and concern?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:39 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:



Could you provide some examples of this lying, etc., by Obama. I have not seen this at all.


Do you remember when Obama said all of the health care debate would be televised on C-SPAN?

Obama is compromising the future of this republic right before your eyes and you can't see it.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:53 pm
@H2O MAN,
waterboy wrote:
Quote:
Obama is compromising the future of this republic right before your eyes and you can't see it.


Another stupid statement by waterboy. He uses global threats like "compromising the future of this republic" without providing how Obama is doing that! He ignores the simple fact that almost all developed countries provide universal health care.

I want to see waterboy provide evidence for what he claims; that "Obama is compromsing the future of this republic?"

It's tiresome to see these yokels from the sticks threaten the destruction of this country without providing any proof or evidence.

Death panels, anyone?
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 02:59 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You typed a bunch of meaningless words... is that how you filibuster?


Obama is compromising the future of this republic... please note that I spelled "compromising" correctly Very Happy
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 03:03 pm
@H2O MAN,
They are meaningless to you, because you can't provide any evidence for your claims. Repeating false claims does not make them true; that's a fact.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 03:05 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

you can't provide any evidence for your claims.


My claims are supported.

Do you remember when Obama said all of the health care debate would be televised on C-SPAN?

Obama is compromising the future of this republic right before your eyes and you can't see it.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 03:08 pm
@H2O MAN,
Yes, they are supported by you. What a phucking laugh you are!

You wouldn't know facts from fiction if your life depended on it.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 03:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Do you remember when Obama said all of the health care debate would be televised on C-SPAN?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 04:02 pm
Quote:
WHO KNOWS where "0" is getting all this additional money he's bribing with..... Taxes and more taxes, into perpetuity, I guess. -dp

Subject: BEN NELSON - NE

Just wanted to make sure your blood pressure doesn't drop! This (alleged) bribe has secured his vote. -sn

The White House and Democrat Leadership in the Senate has [threatened] Senator Nelson they will close every military base in Nebraska [if he doesn't vote for ObamaCare] " a threat that is not credible, really " but they have also offered Senator Nelson between $300 million to $500 million in earmarks, according to key Hill healthcare operatives. These hundreds of millions will be available for whatever he wants to spend them on in Nebraska.

Given Senator Nelson’s hard core earmarking history as an appropriator, the word on the street is that this is the real carrot that could get Nelson to agree to some cover amendment that would allege to protect the innocent unborn from government funding of abortion, but, in fact, would not.

0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 04:20 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

H2O MAN wrote:

The Obama administration is locked into a perpetual campaign mode and one tactic is to say
whatever they think opponents want to hear... this includes lying about any and everything.

You will notice this tactic when they stand in front of a TV camera and profess that they are not
or will never do a certain thing knowing full well that they are and will do what they say they won't.

The Obama administration is using Smoke & Mirrors and Slight of Hand to hide the truth.


Could you provide some examples of this lying, etc., by Obama. I have not seen this at all.


Obama swore to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

He lied!
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 04:33 pm
@H2O MAN,
Example of your rate of contribution on a2k. Claims with no backup.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 15 Dec, 2009 04:34 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Do you remember when Obama said all of the health care debate would be televised on C-SPAN?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1522
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 04/20/2025 at 05:15:37