Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:46 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

I merely speak the truth, they are not insults, but accurate descriptions.


In that case, everything bad said about Republicans is also an accurate description. See how that works?

Quote:
Obama has a legacy that can be described and talked about, it should be common knowledge and something that he should be able to justify and defend. But he is not an open book, the man is cryptic, and that is why he is not to be trusted. That is not an insult, that is an honest opinion based upon real facts. I do not hate the man, but I do resent the fact that the man can have friends that are former terrorists and Marxists, and nobody thinks it is fair to point that out. The record is not made up, the man created his own track record, but it is his supporters that again want to interpret it as hatred, which is total and absolute crap, cyclops, and I think you know it.


No, it's exactly what I said - viciousness. What you call his 'record' is a bunch of innuendo and guilt by association; you are tarring him for knowing people who you disagree with politically and for having different opinions than you do about economic and social issues. None of that justifies the constant vitriol you push his way.

It does speak a lot about your insecurities regarding the fellow, I must say.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:49 am
@Cycloptichorn,
It is more than associations, cyclops, it is a pattern of tendencies. Associations do mean things. Birds of a feather flock together, didn't you ever learn that? This is not a matter of eating in the same restaurant as a Marxist, it is being close friends with, being mentored by them, admiring them, and assciating with them in various kinds of ways which clearly indicates a relationship of similar thinking. It is a clear situation of connecting dots, significant dots, quite a few dots.
okie
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:52 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
It does speak a lot about your insecurities regarding the fellow, I must say.

Cycloptichorn

Bulllllllll. I am very secure and very comfortable in my beliefs. It is Obama and his minions that have gone way out there into left field, and you are an example of someone that is supporting a very shaky and tenuous administration that does not deserve much confidence in what they are doing.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:55 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

It is more than associations, cyclops, it is a pattern of tendencies.


Oooh, a pattern of tendencies. Gotcha. That's so much better proof then just saying 'I don't like his associates.'

Quote:
Associations do mean things. Birds of a feather flock together, didn't you ever learn that?


Yeah, associations mean you know people. In politics (and other forms of life) you meet all sorts of people. It's only those looking to unfairly criticize someone who dwell upon this.

Quote:
this is not a matter of eating in the same restaurant as a Marxist, it is being close friends with, being mentored by them, admiring them, and assciating with them in various kinds of ways which clearly indicates a relationship of similar thinking. It is a clear situation of connecting dots, significant dots, quite a few dots.


Lots of dots, yeah. If only I had a pen, we could figure this whole thing out really quick.

---

Okie, this is ******* ridiculous. I mean, c'mon. Your posts are the definition of smearing and character assassination against the guy, and you've been doing it daily since before he was elected. You are vicious towards him. You need to admit this.

Quote:
Bulllllllll. I am very secure and very comfortable in my beliefs. It is Obama and his minions that have gone way out there into left field, and you are an example of someone that is supporting a very shaky and tenuous administration that does not deserve much confidence in what they are doing.


What is shaky about Obama's admin, exactly? What is tenuous? Please be specific. I doubt you can, because you basically just make up smears about Obama and then never support them.

Cycloptichorn
teenyboone
 
  1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:56 am
@djjd62,
Is that your opinion or a consensus? Every time I respond someone brings in the word "racism". I urge you to wiki it, then look at the word "bigotry".

#1 Barack Obama is generally thought of as "African-American" or Black. He IS in the truest since of the word an African-American and I don't have to define why.
#2 Blacks who descended from slave owners are also called African-Americans, but since most of us don't know which tribe we were taken from, call ourselves, Black.
#3 Right-winged/conservatives or whatever you call yourself are/were anti Barack Obama for various reasons but were careful never to refer to his "race".

First, you wanted to SEE his birth certificate but no one else was asked, even though McCain, the Republican was born in the Canal-Zone of Panama, OUTSIDE The continental US, even though Hawaii where Obama was BORN is part of the United States, the 50th state in 1959. So WHO is the REAL American?

Palin is NOT a native of Alaska, the 49th state and can't tell anyone what she reads! That's because she DOESN'T, (read, that is). All she is, is an EX-beauty queen, a college failure, forget how many schools SHE attended, compared to Obama, Occidental in California, Columbia and Harvard, ALL he graduated from.

You righties, don't want to "expose" your TRUE feelings, even though Obama possesses knowledge of at least 3 languages and a sterling educational background, when Bush's grades come from his rich father padding Yales pockets with cash to get his dumb ass through!

Chris Rock said it best, "when you're white, it's alright"!
djjd62
 
  2  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 11:07 am
@okie,
hate is just a generic term i guess, let's say dislike or disagree with
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 11:10 am
@teenyboone,
hmm, i'm a righty now, a few of the righties think i'm a leftie

i wonder waht i am, i'm more of a middly, with very social leanings, but then as a canadian i guess that makes me a communist in reality

0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 11:30 am
@teenyboone,
teenyboone wrote:

Is that your opinion or a consensus? Every time I respond someone brings in the word "racism". I urge you to wiki it, then look at the word "bigotry".
opinion, i know full well what the word means, i also know you're not gonna do away with it, i think it plays apart in obama's story, but it's not the be all and end all

#1 Barack Obama is generally thought of as "African-American" or Black. He IS in the truest since of the word an African-American and I don't have to define why.
no argument

#2 Blacks who descended from slave owners are also called African-Americans, but since most of us don't know which tribe we were taken from, call ourselves, Black.
no argument

#3 Right-winged/conservatives or whatever you call yourself are/were anti Barack Obama for various reasons but were careful never to refer to his "race".
granted, i'm sure some dislike him for his race, can't change it, never will, but it's his ideology as much anything that most object to, they fear what they think is socialism, you can't believe that folks don't want what he's pushing (and on healthcare i'm behind you 100%), but they don't

First, you wanted to SEE his birth certificate but no one else was asked, even though McCain, the Republican was born in the Canal-Zone of Panama, OUTSIDE The continental US, even though Hawaii where Obama was BORN is part of the United States, the 50th state in 1959. So WHO is the REAL American?
never wanted to see his birth certificate, could care less, pre 9/11, the isssue wouldn't exist, at least not in the guise of "he's a secret muslim", i mean sure you still have the whole born a citizen thing, but ti'm not even sure of that, let' say you elected governor arnold as president, you think he'd hand the US over to the Austrians?

Palin is NOT a native of Alaska, the 49th state and can't tell anyone what she reads! That's because she DOESN'T, (read, that is). All she is, is an EX-beauty queen, a college failure, forget how many schools SHE attended, compared to Obama, Occidental in California, Columbia and Harvard, ALL he graduated from.
who ever the republican candidate or winner is next time, democrats are going to dislike or disagree with them, i think it's the new way of politics,

You righties, don't want to "expose" your TRUE feelings, even though Obama possesses knowledge of at least 3 languages and a sterling educational background, when Bush's grades come from his rich father padding Yales pockets with cash to get his dumb ass through!
i quite like obabma as a person, and i think he's trying to do some good things, but not things that most americans are going to feel comfortable with now or perhaps never

Chris Rock said it best, "when you're white, it's alright"!
chris rock has said some very funny things, some of them about black people as well

ican711nm
 
  0  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 05:58 pm
When are you coveters going to admit the truth about Bush's tax cuts. He cut taxes on every class: the poor, the middle class , and the rich. It is a baldface lie to claim the Bush tax cuts were "tax cuts for the rich."

Quote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2051527/posts
...
Partial History of U.S. Federal Income Tax Rates
...
1971-1981: 15 tax brackets; min= 14%; max =70%
1982-1986: 12 tax brackets; min = 12%; max = 50%
1987-1987: 5 tax brackets; min = 11%; max = 38.5%
1988-1990: 3 tax brackets; min = 15%; max =33%
1991-1992: 3 tax brackets; min = 15%; max = 31%
1993-2000: 5 tax brackets; min = 15%; max = 39.6%
2001-2001: 5 tax brackets; min = 15%; max = 39.1%
2002-2002: 6 tax brackets; min = 10%; max = 38.6%
2003-2008: 6 tax brackets; min = 10%; max = 35%


The Bush tax cuts reduced the minimum tax rate by a third--from 15% to 10%-- and reduced the maximum tax rate by less than an eighth--from 39.6% to 35%. The Bush tax cuts were for both the less wealthy and the more wealthy. However, the less weathy had their taxes reduced by greater factors than were the tax rates reduced for the more wealthy.

The only thing you coveters ever seem interested in is more tax INCREASES for the rich. IT IS a national duty to REMOVE AND keep you GODDAMN COVETORS out of office!
realjohnboy
 
  2  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:01 pm
@ican711nm,
Didn't you post the identical thing on the Econ thread where there is the same cast of A2K characters? Why?
djjd62
 
  2  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:06 pm
@realjohnboy,
because i can http://www.change.org/photos/wordpress_copies/cut-n-paste.jpg
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 09:39 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Hey cyclops, I have a question, and to teeny as well if she cares to answer, or any other Obama supporter here for that matter.
What I am trying to determine here is what you liberals here actually believe about Obama. Is it A or B, as I have described in the following. This is not a test, but it is an effort to get you to answer honestly, and then we can discuss the answers as to what they mean about you.

A. Obama's associations, past history, comments, change mantra, and so on and so forth, they all mean nothing at all, he is really a centrist and has no leanings toward radical socialism.

or

B. You think his associations, past history, comments, change mantra, etc. do indicate he has sympathies toward radical socialism, but since you have similar sympathies, you therefore endorse him and will continue to do so.


Further, let us assume for the sake of discussion that there is in fact indisputable evidence recognized by everyone that Obama has strong sympathies toward Marxism and perhaps would like to incorporate facets of that idealogy in the United States? Let us assume for the sake of discussion here that this has been determined to be the case almost for sure. Cyclops, would that bother you? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being you would have absolutely no concern whatsoever, to perhaps 5 being moderately concerned, and a 10 would be hey, lets vote the man out next election this is very serious, I do not want someone in office with those beliefs, what number between 0 and 10 would you be? And teeny, what number would you be?


cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 11 Dec, 2009 10:13 pm
@okie,
What does it matter if anyone answers your stupid question A or B? You've already made up your mind that all liberals are ignorant, stupid, and without ethics. Where does that leave "them?"
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 06:53 am
@okie,
Let's take a look Okie, for you all liberals (at least all those that voted for Obama) are iliterate, anti-american, socialist, racist welfare-queens who just want your money (taxes) and c.i. and yet you want/expect them to respond to your questions. I suggest that the only one's who will respond to you are idiots, right wing idiots who only parrot your psycho-babble. Am I close Okie?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:13 am
@okie,
I see no liberal has yet had the courage to answer the questions I posed. I have long known that extreme radical leftward politics cannot come out into the full light of day, because it is virtually impossible to defend in light of what we know about extreme radical leftward politics, how it has failed and how it has caused untold misery in history, although increasingly there are some people that are trying it now. However, my questions remain as having choices of distinct answers, as I have summarized them. I would challenge anybody to answer them, but please answer them honestly. If any person considers themselves to be honest, they should not hesitate to be able to answer them honestly and forthrightly, and be prepared to defend what they believe with pride, to defend what they think supports this great country and the freedom and liberty that we enjoy, or something else.

By the way, Obama has hit a new low in his plus / minus rating in Rasmussen today, at Minus 16%. And his overall approval rating is at 46%. These graphs shown as follows.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/var/plain/storage/images/media/obama_index_graphics/december_2009/obama_approval_index_december_12_2009/271273-1-eng-US/obama_approval_index_december_12_2009.jpg
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/var/plain/storage/images/media/obama_total_approval_graphics/december_2009/obama_total_approval_december_12_2009/271276-1-eng-US/obama_total_approval_december_12_2009.jpg
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -16. That’s the lowest Approval Index rating yet recorded for this President "
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:20 am
@okie,
"Extreme radical" is your middle name, okie. Your world is a conglomeration of fuzzy perceptions about the real world; everything in the extreme. Even the sources you use for your opinions comes from "extreme" organizations or individuals.

We all know and understand that all conservatives are fair-minded, honest, hard-working, upstanding citizens of this country, and none has ever been charged with any crime.

Where do we join?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:29 am
@okie,
Maybe some people just cannot grasp the point of my questions posed above. What I am basically asking of Obama supporters is this, do you think Obama has some rather radical socialist beliefs, or do you not, you think his past associations, track record, community organizing history, his mantra of change and all of that, that it means nothing, he is really a centrist, and that is the candidate you voted for, a centrist? Or do you agree that he does harbor radical socialist beliefs, but that you also agree with some or all of those things as well, as he probably does, and so therefore you support him and will continue to support him.

I expect some liberals to accuse me of loaded questions, but they are simple and straightforward, and should be easy to answer for anyone that is honest and is proud of his or her beliefs, and thinks they have good reasons for their beliefs. The questions and potential answers are really just basic common sense questions that every person should ask of themselves with logical thinking when evaluating any presidential candidate or president. This is just basic politics, what we basically believe, and everyone should know what their political philosophy is, and they should be able to defend it honestly.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:31 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Hey cyclops, I have a question, and to teeny as well if she cares to answer, or any other Obama supporter here for that matter.
What I am trying to determine here is what you liberals here actually believe about Obama. Is it A or B, as I have described in the following. This is not a test, but it is an effort to get you to answer honestly, and then we can discuss the answers as to what they mean about you.

A. Obama's associations, past history, comments, change mantra, and so on and so forth, they all mean nothing at all, he is really a centrist and has no leanings toward radical socialism.

or

B. You think his associations, past history, comments, change mantra, etc. do indicate he has sympathies toward radical socialism, but since you have similar sympathies, you therefore endorse him and will continue to do so.


The answer is clearly A though I wish it were more like B, personally.

Okie; I want you to name the actual actions that Obama is taking, or trying to take, that have anything at all to do with 'radical socialism.' And you need to differentiate between normal Democratic, left positions and 'radical socialism,' because they aren't the same thing, at all.

I doubt you will be able to name anything. Obama's actions have shown him to be quite the centrist, not some radical leftist. His term doesn't fit your narrative.

Quote:
Further, let us assume for the sake of discussion that there is in fact indisputable evidence recognized by everyone that Obama has strong sympathies toward Marxism and perhaps would like to incorporate facets of that idealogy in the United States? Let us assume for the sake of discussion here that this has been determined to be the case almost for sure. Cyclops, would that bother you? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being you would have absolutely no concern whatsoever, to perhaps 5 being moderately concerned, and a 10 would be hey, lets vote the man out next election this is very serious, I do not want someone in office with those beliefs, what number between 0 and 10 would you be? And teeny, what number would you be?


I don't know why you are bothering to ask me; I've long told you that the strongest system will incorporate elements of both competition AND cooperation. I wouldn't mind at all seeing more socialistic elements to our government and society. Once again, however, I must point out that nothing that Obama is doing even remotely resembles this.

Quote:
I see no liberal has yet had the courage to answer the questions I posed.


Pfff, some of us have better things to do than sit at home on Friday nights answering your questions, Okie.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:35 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclo, YOu are amazing! You can't see that okie has already described Obama's background as socialist, and at the same time asks the stupid question whether he's a socialist.

Get real, for crying out loud.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Sat 12 Dec, 2009 11:38 am
@Cycloptichorn,
So, if I interpret your answers correctly, you do actually believe Obama is more a centrist than a radical at heart, but you would prefer that he be more radical than you believe him to be? And so I interpret this to mean that you consider yourself well to the left of Obama?
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1516
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 06:14:41