@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:
I don't believe that Clinton turned down Sudan's offer to turn over bin-Laden. Any proof?
Oh no, another apologist! The only proof is Clinton's own words, which if you are like the lawyerly Parados, or Clinton, you will parse to mean what you want them to mean. Clinton said Sudan wanted to do business and instead of taking Bin Laden from them because as Clinton said, "we had no basis to hold him," he then pleaded with the Saudis to take him, but they did not, so he then went to Afghanistan when released.
Only an idiot doesn't see virtual proof in Clintons own words, but I guess liberals will defend anything another liberal does, including the lying cheat of a president, Clinton. And now we have Obama on stage lying about Afghanistan. I noticed Rumsfeld called him out, good for Rummy.