Obama '08?

Are you sure you want to bother, D?

Okie's not a bad guy but he fills his noggin with budget quik-dry and he prefers it that way.

Okie and John McCain apparently believe women love abortions.

Flying Spaghetti Monster willing Left Eye.

T
K
O

http://www.myamericanprayer.com/video.html

This is special.

More hatred and racism at McCain Rally in PA

McCain shows up. They continue to jeer... What's the saying?

"and the band played on"

T
K
O

OMG! OMG! OMG!

Have you heard????

Barack Obama is really the son of Malcolm X!

Link url not working, Nimh.

Btw, did you guys happen to catch Obama's answer to John Stewart about the potential Bradley Effect? "Yeah, they've been saying that for a while, but we're still here. I don't think white voters have gotten this memo about the Bradley Effect." Then he anticipated Stewart's joke about his being half white himself; and played along like he would be conflicted himself.

Earlier, he laughed along about all the accusations of being a socialist, Marxist, etc... then responded, "They found proof when I was in kindergarten, and I shared some toys with my friends."

It was a casually brilliant performance, IMO.

Wait a minute; it is available HERE.

Thanks, bill. I hadn't seen it.

Uh-oh.

OK, let's try this again:

Barack Obama is really the son of Malcolm X!

It's ... special.

Obama leading in most of the nine Bush-swing states

This is kind of entertaining:

Infomercial: Barack Obama, Your Dream Fiancé

Auberon Waugh used to say that the more a man talked about his honesty the faster we counted the spoons.

OMG! She was enrolled at the University of Washington in Seattle, but she birthed a baby in Hawaii?!?!?

Inconceivable! She must've, like, had wings or something!

What is an ad? It is an enticement to buy wares. A 30 minute one costing $5 million will obviously be made by expert enticers whose training has been funded by the very people to be enticed with their fiendish array of lures.

But enticement for what? The produce of the producers obviously. It gets between producers and consumers and has now reached the point of controlling both. It is the "middle-man".

And the megalopolis can only consume. And the consumption is mainly psychological. The wanting of things others may well not want. Cut glass decanters say. Garter belts with black bows on the clasps.

As it looks now the producer states are in for a beating. And the beating can only get more severe because psychological needs have no upper limit unlike physiological needs.

Thus the blue states will be in a similar relation to the red states as the French aristocracy was to the peasants. And take the status quo just as much for granted and as the right and proper way.

As more states become blue it is necessary to find more peasants and outsourcing and immigration become more and more necessary. Which is a good thing for the middle-man as well because its easy to stir the **** up about both.

There's another matter of no small importance.

When an election is hyped up to this pitch the winner's supporters expect pay back. Their expectations have been greatly magnified. And the winner won't be paying. He has no money. He just has to find it.

And this expectation will be intensified among those who have overcome long-standing prejudices to vote for him. The swing states exact their pound of flesh.

It's fascinating.

I just posted this on another thread but thought some of you might enjoy it too...


But now, if folks want to have some really serious fun, I heartily recommend this old thread (Bush Aftermath 1) following immediately on the 2004 election. Take your time. Savor. Pass it on to friends. Quote contents. http://able2know.org/topic/37997-1

OB, were they still playing with toys in the 2003 toasting of Khalid. If only we could get the tape from the LA Times, maybe we would find out what kinds of toys, and who was backslapping who, Obama, Ayers, or Khalid. How old was Obama in 2003? Was he still in Kindergarten? This is getting very bizarre.

Rachel Maddow had a very informative interview with the Senator about his avoidance of partisan or ideological attacks. Maddow also gets answers on the economy and shoring up America's infrastructure.

Here are links to it in case anyone didn't see it. I don't know how to embed an iframe video so you'll have to click the link to see it.

The first one starts at 3 minutes into the video.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908#27464494

Here's the second half which focused on foreign policy issues:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908#27464746

And here's a transcript of the full interview:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27464980/


And an added bonus, she talks with Dan Rather about his observations and reactions to the content of the interview.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908#27464820