cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 05:47 pm
It's your pence.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 06:46 pm
spendius wrote:
c.i.-

Do you think I should hedge my 6-1 bet on Mr McCain yet?
I doubt you'll get a significantly better opportunity.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 09:02 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Poll: McCain's attack strategy paying dividends.


Yes, much like his surge is working in Iraq - McCain's strategy to defeat Obama is working.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 3 Aug, 2008 09:49 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Poll: McCain's attack strategy paying dividends.


Yes, much like his surge is working in Iraq - McCain's strategy to defeat Obama is working.


We have to first see if it's long-term or short-term effect. I think most voters are tired of attacks with no real issues being put on the plate. But that's my HO>.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 06:02 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama holds a two-to-one lead over Republican John McCain among low-wage workers but many are uncommitted to either presidential candidate, to according to a new poll by The Washington Post, the Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University.

Obama's advantage is due largely to overwhelming support from African Americans and Hispanics, but even among white voters, the Illinois senator leads McCain 47 percent to 37 percent, The Washington Post reported in Monday editions.


source
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  0  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 09:13 am
If you asked black folks, say in Detroit, why they were going to vote for Obama, what do you expect their response will be?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 09:20 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Poll: McCain's attack strategy paying dividends.


Yes, much like his surge is working in Iraq - McCain's strategy to defeat Obama is working.


We have to first see if it's long-term or short-term effect. I think most voters are tired of attacks with no real issues being put on the plate. But that's my HO>.


Yeah, everyone is tired of Obama's attacks on McCain.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  0  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 09:54 am
He just said how great of a governor we have here in the state of Michigan. What a big steamy pile of crap. Apparently he hasn't noticed how screwed up Michigan is.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 09:59 am
Of course Michigan's governor is great.

How could a Democrat be otherwise?

Obama will lose Michigan, and several rust belt states that he is said to be winning at the moment.

Whether that will be enough, well, time will tell. He's still IMHO got about a 2-1 shot at being elected, I'm not happy to report.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:01 am
Very funny! I typed "obama's attack on mccain" into Google, and most of the 7.4 million hits shows that McCain attacks Obama in the majority on the list.

False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:06 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Very funny! I typed "obama's attack on mccain" into Google, and most of the 7.4 million hits shows that McCain attacks Obama in the majority on the list.

False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.


False accusations, eh?

And you claimed to review 7.4 million hits to determine that 'the majority' were about McCain attacking Obama?

If you looked at 200, I would be very surprised.

Don't come here talking about 'false' this and that, while telling whoppers, CI. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:06 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.

Careful CI -- This is your family you're talking about!
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:08 am
Thomas wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.

Careful CI -- This is your family you're talking about!


CI has told us several times that most of his family members are smarter than he is and that they are Christians.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:09 am
cjhsa wrote:
If you asked black folks, say in Detroit, why they were going to vote for Obama, what do you expect their response will be?


from the previous linke

Quote:
but even among white voters, the Illinois senator leads McCain 47 percent to 37 percent
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:10 am
Thomas wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.

Careful CI -- This is your family you're talking about!


Thomas, This is one of the reasons I argue with my siblings to much about politics. My opinion just on Bush and how he destroyed our country is a biggie.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:15 am
real life wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Very funny! I typed "obama's attack on mccain" into Google, and most of the 7.4 million hits shows that McCain attacks Obama in the majority on the list.

False accusations are part and parcel of the conservatives; they have no ethics.


False accusations, eh?

And you claimed to review 7.4 million hits to determine that 'the majority' were about McCain attacking Obama?

If you looked at 200, I would be very surprised.

Don't come here talking about 'false' this and that, while telling whoppers, CI. Rolling Eyes


real, Can you ever get real? A quick perusal of the first ten pages will show a very small amount of Obama attacks against McCain, and even those are not real attacks. 200? You dumb ass; do your research and provide evidence before you challenge my post(s).

Do you know what "evidence" means?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:21 am
You claimed to know what a majority of 7.4 million internet pages said.

I don't think you do, and your reply does nothing to substantiate your claim.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:49 am
real life wrote:
You claimed to know what a majority of 7.4 million internet pages said.

I don't think you do, and your reply does nothing to substantiate your claim.


No real, it doesn't work that way. I made a claim; it's up to you to show how I was wrong. You're the one who has challenged my claim; it's up to you to show evidence my claim was wrong.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:50 am
"My" claim was made from those 7.4 million posts. Show me the beef?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Mon 4 Aug, 2008 10:53 am
You got no beef and you got no proof that you have any clue what the 'majority' of 7.4 million internet pages say.

You fit in well with the Democrats, the way you tell whoppers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1040
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 01/29/2025 at 05:10:20