Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Al-Qaida Issues "Final Warning" To American Citizens
Says two massive attacks against U.S. are now "in place" and cannot be stopped by Government
Claims destruction inside U.S. will be so much bigger than September 11 it will boggle our minds

Quote:

3/10/2006

WASHINGTON – Islamic websites yesterday posted a "last warning" warning by Rakan Ben Williams, who describes himself as an "al-Qaida undercover soldier" in the U.S., threatening two major operations designed to bring Americans "to your knees."

According to the Middle East Media Research Institute, the Global Islamic Media Front was responsible for posting the threat.

Williams is a mystery man, who, according to the London Arabic newspaper Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, is an English convert to Islam.

The threat suggests the attack will be far greater in magnitude than Sept. 11, 2001, because following this one, "there will be no one to analyze and investigate, because the mind and the heart will be unable to comprehend it. ... This will not be a single operation, but two; one bigger than the other, but we will begin with the big one and postpone the bigger one, in order to see [how] diligent the American people is [in preserving] its life. If it chooses life, [it must] carry out the demands of the Muslims, and if it chooses death, then we are its best perpetrators."

The warning appeared in Arabic and in English.

"Do not put your hopes on Bush and his clan, they are incapable of protecting you, and if they think they are, let them foil or stop the two upcoming operations, and punish those who are responsible for them," says the statement. "But if they could not identify and foil the devastating events coming your way, you must ask yourselves: How long will we continue allowing ourselves to be slaughtered with full advance knowledge of our fate?

"Let me now inform you why we opted to inform you about the two operations and your inability to stop them before they are carried out. The reason is simple: You cannot uncover or stop them except by letting them be carried out. Furthermore, the best you could do would be to accelerate the day of carrying out the operations. In other words, if we schedule the operation to take place tomorrow, the best you could do is to make it happen today."

The spokesman claims the operations are inevitable – even if the specific plans are uncovered by authorities.

"This indeed is a sweet situation to be in," he says. "It is a win-win all the way for us. It is the ultimate control and the most stunning way to stop an operation (accelerating it with the same impact). What we are saying is this: You will have a choice of either let us carry it out on our own schedule and with our own hands or allow your own intelligence apparatus to cause it to happen. This second choice will cause a level of dissatisfaction (with your decision makers) to reach its highest level. Therefore, your Homeland Security agencies would have no choice but to surrender and wait for the inevitable to happen."

Williams asserts, he "will not give any more clues; this is enough as a wake up call. Perhaps the American people will start thinking about the magnitude of the danger that is coming their way."

The statement also appears to be an attempt to divide Americans by region.

"O you helpless Americans, especially those living in States far away from Washington, D.C.!" he says. "Your country is comprised of many states that should not have anything to do with Muslims. Take the state of Arizona for example; what does this state have to do with killing Muslims in Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq? What interest is it of theirs serving, helping, and siding with the Jews and Israel? If some members of your Congress and Senate are being used as Jewish tools manipulated by Israel, why do you bear the consequences? Why do you bring death and destruction to your homes and lives in an apparent sacrifice for a handful of dishonest men and women?"

The statement says the operations are awaiting only a final order from Osama bin Laden.

"The operations are ready to go, we are just waiting for orders from the commander in chief, Osama bin Laden (may Allah preserve him)," it says. "He will decide whether to strike or to hold. We swear by Allah that there are so many tricks and tactical maneuvers that will make your heads spin, by the grace of Allah. You will be brought to your knees, but not until you lose more loved ones and experience significant destruction."

It continues: "Now is the time to wake up and dust off this state of complacency and ineffectiveness to save yourselves and your loved ones from catastrophes sure to come your way. Remove war mongers from positions of power and throw them in prisons, where they belong. Rid yourselves of 'the Jewish pests' that brought nothing to you but adversity and loss of lives and wealth. They have deceived you for many years, it is time now you turn the table on them and make an example out of them. Rid yourselves of media crafters who deliberately kept you in the dark for so long and made a mockery of you before the rest of the world."

Boycott NBC news and dismiss its Jewish CEO, Fred Silverman. Do the same to INC news and fire its Jewish owner, Leonard Goldstein, the same is true for CBS and its owner William Bailey. Find credible media outlets that bring nothing to you but facts. Unfortunately you won’t find any in your country. Do you know why? Because your rogue State fights any media dedicated to the truth, no matter how small it is.

"Visit Mujahideen web sites to get to know who they are. You will see for yourselves that they are not what your media outlets made you believe they are. If you cannot do that, the least you could do is to watch Al-Jazeera Channel; there you might get 20% or less of the truth about the war zones. Resent the corrupted politicians in Washington, D.C. and demand justice, if they do not give in to your demands, you must declare autonomy so you may live in peace and security.

"This is the last warning you will receive from us. Consequently, if you ignore it, we regret to inform you that we will carry out devastating operations against the States of America and we will not show mercy whatsoever, you would have brought destruction to yourselves. Do not ever forget, you have rejected the truce which was offered to you by Muslims; you have supported the thieves of the white house and blessed their adventures. Therefore, you get nothing from us short of similar treatment; for only blood for blood.

"May Allah facilitate a way for us to spill the blood of the occupiers and cut off the heads of the aggressors. Allah has full power and control over all of His affairs, but most mankind knows not.

"Rakan Ben Williams

"Al-Qaeda under cover soldier

"USA"

http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/

http://www.tonyrogers.com/news/images/nuclear_suitcase.jpg

http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/week/images/suit.jpg

http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/book.jpg

http://www.humanunderground.com/images/bigbadaboom4.jpg

I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,611 • Replies: 29

No top replies

Shazaaaaam

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Zippo wrote:

...I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Sovereign is technically true, but in Iraq's case it only meant that a grup of thugs ran the country and killed or tortured any citizen who dared to express disagreement. As for "lies," you people never seem to be able to give a specific example of a single lie. When I ask, you always either make remarks about me, or else post a link to 100 vague accusations. What you don't do is simply give an example of a lie.

Zippo wrote:

Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

0 Replies

Quote:

Chicken Little, the sky is falling!

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Brandon9000 wrote:

Zippo wrote:

...
Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

Looks like Neverland is in for it:

0 Replies

It would make one hell of a Bruce Willis thriller.

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Brandon9000 wrote:

Zippo wrote:

...I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Sovereign is technically true, but in Iraq's case it only meant that a grup of thugs ran the country and killed or tortured any citizen who dared to express disagreement. As for "lies," you people never seem to be able to give a specific example of a single lie. When I ask, you always either make remarks about me, or else post a link to 100 vague accusations. What you don't do is simply give an example of a lie.

Zippo wrote:
Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

will you please be on the first team that lands?

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Brandon9000 wrote:

Zippo wrote:

...I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Sovereign is technically true, but in Iraq's case it only meant that a grup of thugs ran the country and killed or tortured any citizen who dared to express disagreement. As for "lies," you people never seem to be able to give a specific example of a single lie. When I ask, you always either make remarks about me, or else post a link to 100 vague accusations. What you don't do is simply give an example of a lie.

Zippo wrote:
Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

http://schinckel.blogsome.com/images/BrokenRecord.jpg

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

blueveinedthrobber wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:

...I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Sovereign is technically true, but in Iraq's case it only meant that a grup of thugs ran the country and killed or tortured any citizen who dared to express disagreement. As for "lies," you people never seem to be able to give a specific example of a single lie. When I ask, you always either make remarks about me, or else post a link to 100 vague accusations. What you don't do is simply give an example of a lie.

Zippo wrote:
Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

will you please be on the first team that lands?

BVT, based on the depth of his thoughts, I always assumed Brandon was a young kid, turns out he is like 52. Amazing!

0 Replies

a 52 year old who fancies himself an academic can still go serve if he really wants to. lots of private teams of armed forces paying big bucks to real he men.

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

blueveinedthrobber wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:

...I wonder what boy George and his Al CIAda have planned this time ? ? ?

While his buddy Bin Laden roams free our military is bogged down in Iraq. A sovereign nation that was invaded based on lies.

Sovereign is technically true, but in Iraq's case it only meant that a grup of thugs ran the country and killed or tortured any citizen who dared to express disagreement. As for "lies," you people never seem to be able to give a specific example of a single lie. When I ask, you always either make remarks about me, or else post a link to 100 vague accusations. What you don't do is simply give an example of a lie.

Zippo wrote:
Who will we invade next after boy George and his Al CIAda attack again ? ? ?

Probably some country with a hideous dictator developing nuclear and/or biological weapons to threaten the world with.

Any questions?

will you please be on the first team that lands?

Your usual trenchant argument, that forces me to admit that my reasoning was incorrect.

0 Replies

Re: Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Roxxxanne wrote:

BVT, based on the depth of his thoughts, I always assumed Brandon was a young kid, turns out he is like 52. Amazing!

If my preferred method of countering someone's ideas was to try to impeach his character, at least I'd feel ashamed of it. Despite any rationalizations or spin you may advance, your continuing failure to state a logical flaw with any of my ideas simply indicates that you cannot.

0 Replies

Two possibilities: our enemy will either carryout another murderous attack on American soil, or no attack will take place.

1. Americans are not so stupid as to believe any security program is absolutely perfect in its ability to forestall sneak attacks carried out by a small band of fanatics willing to die. A few, mostly on the Left, would continue to insist that the War on Terror is nothing less than a fraud perpetuated by the President and the Republican Party. Most Americans however, would unite as never before in defense of the Country.

Anyone who believes that in the wake of another attack, of equal or greater dimension than 9/11, the American People will surrender to a small band of international thugs and outlaws is terribly mistaken. The greater the destruction and distruption, the more terrible the revenge that will be called for. Today there are still people in this country who can argue that carrying on an expensive war to thwart Radical Islmaic terrorism is a mistake and wrong. Across the political spectrum the risks and costs to civil liberties associated with the effort are a concern. Opponents of carrying on the struggle are active and vocal in attacking U.S. policy and spreading enemy propaganda.

In the wake of another attack, the American People would be united as never before ... even after Pearl Harbor. If there was the least evidence that any foreign nation was involved in even the most remote fashion, our government would be under great pressure to inflict, without delay, even greater damage against that country, or countries. The issue of financial costs of the War on Terror would be mooted in the United States. I believe that sedition laws would again find their way into legislation and the risk to civil liberties would increase; the very thing that the Left fears. There would be, I'm afraid, violence directed against anyone, citizen or not, in the U.S. who was Muslim, or of Middle Eastern extraction.

Just what is the worst case scenario? Conventional explosives are most likely, and cunningly used could cause widespread disruption in power transmission, communications, and/or transportation networks. The amount of conventional explosives needed to produce large numbers of casualties, and the effective lethal footprint of conventional explosives, would greatly constrain the enemy. Chemical weapons released in a densily populated urban area could produce large casualty lists, but are not generally presistent and lose their effectivenss as disbursed on the winds. Even so a chemical attack may be the next most likely after conventional explosives, as a weapon of terrorist choice. Biological agents are much tougher to weaponize, and many once released are difficult to control. The most fearsome biologicals, like Small Pox, would be hard for terrorists to obtain, and in the end might well kill more Muslims than Americans and Europeans.

A nuclear attack is the Great Boogyman. Where would Islamic Terrorists obtain an Atom Bomb? The DPRK? A blackmarket device stolen from the old Soviet Union stockpile? Pakestan? Iran? Sources of such a weapon are limited, and there are inherent difficulties with Al Quida getting a usable weapon from any of the possible sources. Can anybody doubt that our intelligence community has no higher priority than keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of Bin Ladin? Delivery of a nuclear weapon also might be difficult. There are "suitcase nukes", but they don't fit into regular luggage and leak radiation badly. More likely would be one of the larger and more crudely produced weapons from the DPRK, and those would have to come in a shipping container to one of our ports ... presumably a West Coast port of entry, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, or Seattle. Carrying dismantled componnents over one of our land borders would be difficult due to weight, radiation and final assembly constraints. To set off a Hiroshima type nuke is unlikely, but remotely possible.

More likely would be a radiological device. A small amount of radioactive material disbursed by a conventional explosive from the top of a moderately high building. Physical damage and immediate casualties would be soley from the conventional exlosion. The radioactive material would be carried on the wind, much like a chemical. The footprint of the radioactive material would also be similar to a chemical dispersion. Few serious casualties would probably result, but the panic and terror engendered might be significant.

All in all, Al Quida may threaten the end of the world, but their capability falls far short of that. They may be able to kill and maim thousands in a few coordinated attacks on American urban areas, but other places and populations would not be significantly harmed physically. They might be able to disrupt power, communications and transportation systems, but only temporarily. Don't lose too much sleep worrying about it, the government is doing what it can with the tools we've allowed them.

The result of another devastating attack on the United States would greatly increase the risks of outright war in Southwest Asia with heightened levels of violence in Europe and other areas where Muslims make up a large but minority segment of the population. Al Quida would have achieved at least one of their objectives, the sparking of a vicious religious-based war between Islam and the rest of the world. A war, I might add, that they would ultimately lose.

2. If the threat turns out to be credible but does not occur, Al Quida's credibility will be further erroded. The propriety of this Administration's policies and efforts will be shown as effective. US intelligence and NSA are on the job, and they are very good even if the Left believes they are all a bunch of stooges. The government's resources for reacting to credible threats is enhanced by the Patriot Act, and there are military and police units that are trained and ready to respond. Admittably our national security against a sneak attack carried out by a small band of fanatics is not and can never be perfect, but this Administration has greatly increased our readiness since the last attack.

0 Replies

Asherman wrote:

Two possibilities: our enemy will either carryout another murderous attack on American soil, or no attack will take place.

1. Americans are not so stupid...In the wake of another attack, the American People would be united as never before ... even after Pearl Harbor....

I think you may have a slightly optimistic view of human nature, Ash. People generally believe what they want to believe, regardless of the evidence. A lot of that was apparent in Europe on the eve of WW2:

Phoenix32890 wrote:

Quote:
Chicken Little, the sky is falling!

Today, we confront a number of very serious dangers of which two are:

1. Terrorism, mostly Islamic.
2. The proliferation of WMD technology.

But mostly, the government's efforts to treat these seriously are met with criticism and ridicule.

People in the West have had a very long run of prosperity and comfort, and cannot be expected to take kindly to the idea that the golden age may be coming to an end in a world of very real dangers that require very serious action and sacrifice to meet.

0 Replies

http://www.boingboing.net/images/nunmitgun.jpg

0 Replies

Is this the same Al Qaida that Bush has unjustly made a boogeyman out of to scare everybody with for the last 4 years?

0 Replies

66 Killed, 300 Wounded in Iraq Attacks today. Good going Bushies.

0 Replies

All this sturm, drang and portentousness.

As far as I can see on the net, this person is thought to have no connection to Al Quaeda or bin Laden.

0 Replies

blueflame1 wrote:

66 Killed, 300 Wounded in Iraq Attacks today. Good going Bushies.

Almost all the result of the people we're fighting against, many from bombs planted in public place with the deliberate intention of killing non-combatants.

I'm not sure what the point of your statistic is, unless it's to imply that all war is wrong. Do you only approve of wars in which there are no casualties? How do casualties prove that a war wasn't justified? Your logic needs some explanation.

0 Replies

Brandon, the war in Iraq was built on lies. It was unjust and unneeded as one former CIC has said. That in itself is historic. A former American CIC calling the current CIC's war unjust and unneeded. Most Americans agree Bushie deliberately lied us into war. That is a huge accusation.

0 Replies

Al-Qaida Gives "Final Warning" to America

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know