1
   

[B]What It Means To Be A Republican[/B]

 
 
Reply Mon 6 Mar, 2006 12:37 am
What It Means To Be A Republican
by Larry Beinhart

The vice president shoots you in the heart and in the face. Then you apologize for all the trouble it's caused him. That's what it means to be a Republican.

Despite almost hysterical warnings the president stays asleep at the wheel. He does nothing about terrorism and 9/11 happens. He responds by running away to Nebraska. Three days later he makes a supposedly impromptu speech with a bull horn on the rubble of the World Trade Center. He is universally cheered as a hero. That's what it means to be a Republican. The president puts together false claims to go to war with the wrong country. His party universally supports him. That's what it means to be a Republican.

The administration mismanages the war in Iraq so that it creates chaos, a breeding ground for terrorists and political opportunities for Islamic fundamentalists. Along the way, the reasons for going to war are exposed as false. The president runs on national security as his main issue. He is re-elected. That's what it means to be a Republican.

The president cheerfully gives away the surplus to the richest people in the country. Then he runs up record debts, just to throw more money their way. He claims it has helped America's economy. People act like they believe him. That's what it means to be a Republican.

The administration continues it's magnificent tradition of going to sleep when it is warned of disaster. It does nothing when Katrina is coming. It continues its record of doing nothing when disaster arrives. As New Orleans was lost, just as when the World Trade Center was lost, the president got as far away as possible. But he can't be blamed for what nature did. That's what it means to be a Republican.

The president orders wiretaps without warrants, a straightforward violation of the constitution. When the Attorney General is called to testify, the head of the Judiciary Committee insists that his testimony not be under oath. The head of the intelligence committee suggests that the law be changed, now, to make it legal after the fact. That's what it means to be a Republican.

Alberto Gonzales helped come up with the program that rejected the Geneva Conventions, that permits torture, that says that the president is above the law and that "I was only following orders" should be a defense against a charge of war crimes. Ah, if only the Nazi war criminals who were hung at Nuremberg had Gonzales there to defend them. The president nominates Gonzales to be his new Attorney General. He is confirmed with little debate and no outrage. That's what it means to be a Republican.

This needs to be understood.

What it implies is that Republicans can't be dealt with as if reason and facts will sway them. Because it wont. It's hard for reality based people, regular Democrats and Liberals to understand that.

What it let's us know is that reality based people, Democrats, Liberals, real Conservatives, old-fashioned Republicans and non-profit Christians have to take more vigorous and rigorous stands. Or reality and real American values and the American landscape will disappear, not just temporarily, but forever. Confused

Larry Beinhart is the author of Wag the Dog, The Librarian, and Fog Facts: Searching for Truth in the Land of Spin.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,589 • Replies: 34
No top replies

 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Mar, 2006 06:57 am
Republicanism is a religion.

Good Christians give thanks to God for saving a baby during Katrina.

The rest of the family died and the neighborhood was destroyed. They don't question that, they only know how to give thanks.

Few Republicans question their leaders. Their only purpose in life is to support their party, right or wrong.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Mar, 2006 08:36 am
There's a big difference between supporting the Republicans and opposing the current crop of Democrats - lesser evil, and all that. While there are a buncha things I don't like about the current Republican platform and practice, there isn't much at all I like about the present Democrat agenda; I see it largely as a clear and present danger.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Mar, 2006 09:12 am
Actually that is kind of encouraging Timberlandko. If more republicans actually feel as you do and a republican does get elected in 08' maybe we can roll back some of the damage from the current Republican platform and practices. Personally I don't care which side gets elected as long as they are completely opposite than what we have now.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Mar, 2006 09:13 am
detano inipo wrote:
Republicanism is a religion.

Good Christians give thanks to God for saving a baby during Katrina.

The rest of the family died and the neighborhood was destroyed. They don't question that, they only know how to give thanks.

Few Republicans question their leaders. Their only purpose in life is to support their party, right or wrong.


It is a cult.
0 Replies
 
paull
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Mar, 2006 01:52 pm
"Reality based people". I like that, a whole new subgroup to which anyone can be proud to belong.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Mar, 2006 02:56 pm
detano inipo wrote:
Few Republicans question their leaders. Their only purpose in life is to support their party, right or wrong.


Really? Then what happened when the Democrats were more right-wing than the Republicans back during the days of JFK? I always assumed the right-wing elements of the Democrat Party abandoned ship and made their way to the Republican Part... But then again, our schools never covered that part of history.

(Rightfully so. We hardly learnt anything about our own nation's history. You'd think the History Curriculum was set by America and Germany).
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Mar, 2006 04:31 am
Re: What It Means To Be A Republican
Quote:
9/11 happens. He responds by running away to Nebraska.


I am still bemused over the fact that the most extreme of Bush's critics find fault with the standard Secret Service procedures of bustling the president away from likely assassins.

It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.



Quote:
The president puts together false claims to go to war with the wrong country.


Afghanistan was the correct country.



Quote:
The president cheerfully gives away the surplus to the richest people in the country. Then he runs up record debts, just to throw more money their way. He claims it has helped America's economy. People act like they believe him. That's what it means to be a Republican.


I'd rather it were done with spending increases, but deficit spending can help bring us out of a recession.



Quote:
wiretaps without warrants, a straightforward violation of the constitution.


Hardly.



Quote:
Alberto Gonzales helped come up with the program that rejected the Geneva Conventions, that permits torture,


The torture is of course illegal.

But it is perfectly legal to detain a captured enemy soldier until the end of the war.

And if that enemy soldier is an unlawful combatant, they lose their Geneva 3 POW status and can be detained incommunicado under Geneva 4.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Jul, 2006 11:25 pm
Re: What It Means To Be A Republican
oralloy wrote:
Quote:
9/11 happens. He responds by running away to Nebraska.


I am still bemused over the fact that the most extreme of Bush's critics find fault with the standard Secret Service procedures of bustling the president away from likely assassins.

It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.



Quote:
The president puts together false claims to go to war with the wrong country.


Afghanistan was the correct country.


Quote:
The president cheerfully gives away the surplus to the richest people in the country. Then he runs up record debts, just to throw more money their way. He claims it has helped America's economy. People act like they believe him. That's what it means to be a Republican.


I'd rather it were done with spending increases, but deficit spending can help bring us out of a recession.



Quote:
wiretaps without warrants, a straightforward violation of the constitution.


Hardly.



Quote:
Alberto Gonzales helped come up with the program that rejected the Geneva Conventions, that permits torture,


The torture is of course illegal.

But it is perfectly legal to detain a captured enemy soldier until the end of the war.

And if that enemy soldier is an unlawful combatant, they lose their Geneva 3 POW status and can be detained incommunicado under Geneva 4.


Afganistan is the correct country to bomb? Where DO you get your information, Mr. Dithers? Try wikipedia for some reality:

List of the hijackers from wikipedia:

Note: There have been variations in the spelling of the names of the alleged hijackers in differing accounts of the attacks. This is because there is no one correct way of transliterating from the Arabic alphabet to the Latin alphabet.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 11 were reported to be:

Waleed al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Wail al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta (Egyptian)
Abdulaziz al-Omari (Saudi Arabian)
Satam al-Suqami (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta is believed to have flown Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
Aboard United Airlines Flight 175 the hijackers were reported to be:

Marwan al-Shehhi (from the United Arab Emirates)
Fayez Banihammad (from the United Arab Emirates)
Mohand al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Hamza al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Marwan al-Shehhi is believed to have flown Flight 175 into the South Tower.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 77 were reported to be:

Khalid al-Mihdhar (Saudi Arabian)
Majed Moqed (Saudi Arabian)
Nawaf al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Salem al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour is believed to have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
The hijackers aboard United Airlines Flight 93 were reported to be:

Ahmed al-Haznawi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Nami (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese)
Saeed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah is believed to have crashed Flight 93 into the Pennsylvania countryside to prevent or end an assault by the passengers.
Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Hamza al-Ghamdi, and Ahmad al-Haznawi came from three neighboring towns and belonged to the same tribe. Wail al-Shehri was Waleed al-Shehri's older brother. Salem al-Hazmi was a younger brother of Nawaf al-Hazmi

See anyone from Iraq or Afganistan, or Iran? NOPE. Why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia? Because of the binLaden/Bush/Carlyle Group connection.

You Americans were LIED to. Again. You invaded countries and murdered innocent people that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. You should all be held as war criminals, especially the soldiers who go like sheep to do the killing for creeps like Bush et al.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 06:25 am
Re: What It Means To Be A Republican
pachelbel wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Quote:
9/11 happens. He responds by running away to Nebraska.


I am still bemused over the fact that the most extreme of Bush's critics find fault with the standard Secret Service procedures of bustling the president away from likely assassins.

It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.



Quote:
The president puts together false claims to go to war with the wrong country.


Afghanistan was the correct country.


Quote:
The president cheerfully gives away the surplus to the richest people in the country. Then he runs up record debts, just to throw more money their way. He claims it has helped America's economy. People act like they believe him. That's what it means to be a Republican.


I'd rather it were done with spending increases, but deficit spending can help bring us out of a recession.



Quote:
wiretaps without warrants, a straightforward violation of the constitution.


Hardly.



Quote:
Alberto Gonzales helped come up with the program that rejected the Geneva Conventions, that permits torture,


The torture is of course illegal.

But it is perfectly legal to detain a captured enemy soldier until the end of the war.

And if that enemy soldier is an unlawful combatant, they lose their Geneva 3 POW status and can be detained incommunicado under Geneva 4.


Afganistan is the correct country to bomb? Where DO you get your information, Mr. Dithers? Try wikipedia for some reality:

List of the hijackers from wikipedia:

Note: There have been variations in the spelling of the names of the alleged hijackers in differing accounts of the attacks. This is because there is no one correct way of transliterating from the Arabic alphabet to the Latin alphabet.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 11 were reported to be:

Waleed al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Wail al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta (Egyptian)
Abdulaziz al-Omari (Saudi Arabian)
Satam al-Suqami (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta is believed to have flown Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
Aboard United Airlines Flight 175 the hijackers were reported to be:

Marwan al-Shehhi (from the United Arab Emirates)
Fayez Banihammad (from the United Arab Emirates)
Mohand al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Hamza al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Marwan al-Shehhi is believed to have flown Flight 175 into the South Tower.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 77 were reported to be:

Khalid al-Mihdhar (Saudi Arabian)
Majed Moqed (Saudi Arabian)
Nawaf al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Salem al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour is believed to have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
The hijackers aboard United Airlines Flight 93 were reported to be:

Ahmed al-Haznawi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Nami (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese)
Saeed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah is believed to have crashed Flight 93 into the Pennsylvania countryside to prevent or end an assault by the passengers.
Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Hamza al-Ghamdi, and Ahmad al-Haznawi came from three neighboring towns and belonged to the same tribe. Wail al-Shehri was Waleed al-Shehri's older brother. Salem al-Hazmi was a younger brother of Nawaf al-Hazmi

See anyone from Iraq or Afganistan, or Iran? NOPE. Why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia? Because of the binLaden/Bush/Carlyle Group connection.

You Americans were LIED to. Again. You invaded countries and murdered innocent people that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. You should all be held as war criminals, especially the soldiers who go like sheep to do the killing for creeps like Bush et al.


I hate to be the one to tell you but we already took care of Afganistan and removed their leadership and crippled the terrosists.

Also, we already know Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

You may want to read up on the subject before you start with your HATE AMERICA dribble.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  0  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 06:49 am
Look...I can cut & paste and insult democrats with absurd stereotypes, just as well as Pachelbel

Quote:

You Might Be A Democrat If
You think "ethics" is an eastern European country.
You've named your kids with hyphenated first and last names.
You've tried to argue that poverty could be abolished if people were only willing to redistribute their wealth.
You've ever referred to someone as a "bigot or Nazi".
You've ever tried to prove Jesus was a married man.
You oppose the death penalty, but support abortion.
You don't support school choice for others, only for yourself.
You think you might remember laughing once as an adult and feeling guilty about it.
You once broke loose at a party and inhaled, but don't admit it.
You support diversity, as long as others agree with you.
You've referred to moral fiber thinking it was a new man made textile.
You've ever uttered the phrase, "you hypocrite".
You've ever said, "the Bill Of Rights is outdated".
You answer to "No One".
You support PETA and Green Peace, but still eat beef, fish, lamb, and wear leather garments.
You protest your neighbor clearing their yard of weeds.
You only let your kids watch PBS and listen to NPR.
You scream at the thought of agreeing with a Republican.
You've argued that Western values are no values.
You agree that all the world's problems can be traced back to white Anglo-Saxon men taking advantage of others.
When people say "Marx," you think, "to bad his idea didn't work".
You've ever yelled, "capitalist".
You still wear the Birkenstocks you purchased in 1969.
You argue that you need 300 laws to control guns.
You really think that guns kill people. Not people kill people.
You want to protest something but don't know what.
You've ever said "I support civil liberties, but not personal liberties."
You will not admit that trees are a renewable resource.
You've ever said "reduce paper, save a tree".
You donate money because it makes you "feel good".
You came of age in the '60s and don't understand what went wrong.
You justify lying cheating Democrats because Republicans lie and cheat.
You ever start or end an argument on the phrase, "you are closed minded".
You never told a child that Oscar the Grouch "lives in a trash can" because he chooses to do so.
You think denial is a virtue.
You don't mind contributing 4 months of your salary to the government. You're only sorry it can't be more.
You believe that everyone else is responsible for you but you.


Source
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 07:01 am
By your standards we should be attacking Jordon and Syira because that is where most of the terrorists are from who are doing most of the damage in Iraq.

It was never said Saddam had anything to do with 9-11 only that he was a supporter of terrorism and had WMD's that he had not disposed of as well as his abuse of his people in Iraq. The weapons have started to be found granted they weren't the ones we were looking for but we have found some none the less. We now have documented facts of his connections to terrorism as well as his support for terrorists in Israel by paying off homicide bombers families. We have found mass graves and torture rooms. All of these things have been correct.

I will say that it is time to start pulling out of Iraq due to the civil war that is really starting to get going. I hope those that support the current govt win so that we don't have to send my kids there in 20 years to root out a taliban type govt who supports more terrorism.

As for Afghanistan well things are going well here. Sure we get rockets launched into my base every now and then. More lately because of current operations but no has been killed and we are getting those who are responsible. The people as a whole are thankful and are helping us catch those who attack us.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 01:53 pm
Re: What It Means To Be A Republican
woiyo wrote:
pachelbel wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Quote:
9/11 happens. He responds by running away to Nebraska.


I am still bemused over the fact that the most extreme of Bush's critics find fault with the standard Secret Service procedures of bustling the president away from likely assassins.

It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.



Quote:
The president puts together false claims to go to war with the wrong country.


Afghanistan was the correct country.


Quote:
The president cheerfully gives away the surplus to the richest people in the country. Then he runs up record debts, just to throw more money their way. He claims it has helped America's economy. People act like they believe him. That's what it means to be a Republican.


I'd rather it were done with spending increases, but deficit spending can help bring us out of a recession.



Quote:
wiretaps without warrants, a straightforward violation of the constitution.


Hardly.



Quote:
Alberto Gonzales helped come up with the program that rejected the Geneva Conventions, that permits torture,


The torture is of course illegal.

But it is perfectly legal to detain a captured enemy soldier until the end of the war.

And if that enemy soldier is an unlawful combatant, they lose their Geneva 3 POW status and can be detained incommunicado under Geneva 4.


Afganistan is the correct country to bomb? Where DO you get your information, Mr. Dithers? Try wikipedia for some reality:

List of the hijackers from wikipedia:

Note: There have been variations in the spelling of the names of the alleged hijackers in differing accounts of the attacks. This is because there is no one correct way of transliterating from the Arabic alphabet to the Latin alphabet.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 11 were reported to be:

Waleed al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Wail al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta (Egyptian)
Abdulaziz al-Omari (Saudi Arabian)
Satam al-Suqami (Saudi Arabian)
Mohammed Atta is believed to have flown Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
Aboard United Airlines Flight 175 the hijackers were reported to be:

Marwan al-Shehhi (from the United Arab Emirates)
Fayez Banihammad (from the United Arab Emirates)
Mohand al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
Hamza al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Marwan al-Shehhi is believed to have flown Flight 175 into the South Tower.
The hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 77 were reported to be:

Khalid al-Mihdhar (Saudi Arabian)
Majed Moqed (Saudi Arabian)
Nawaf al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Salem al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour (Saudi Arabian)
Hani Hanjour is believed to have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
The hijackers aboard United Airlines Flight 93 were reported to be:

Ahmed al-Haznawi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Nami (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese)
Saeed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ziad Jarrah is believed to have crashed Flight 93 into the Pennsylvania countryside to prevent or end an assault by the passengers.
Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Hamza al-Ghamdi, and Ahmad al-Haznawi came from three neighboring towns and belonged to the same tribe. Wail al-Shehri was Waleed al-Shehri's older brother. Salem al-Hazmi was a younger brother of Nawaf al-Hazmi

See anyone from Iraq or Afganistan, or Iran? NOPE. Why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia? Because of the binLaden/Bush/Carlyle Group connection.

You Americans were LIED to. Again. You invaded countries and murdered innocent people that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. You should all be held as war criminals, especially the soldiers who go like sheep to do the killing for creeps like Bush et al.


I hate to be the one to tell you but we already took care of Afganistan and removed their leadership and crippled the terrosists.

Also, we already know Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

You may want to read up on the subject before you start with your HATE AMERICA dribble.



I hate to ask you, but what the hell are Americans still doing in Iraq? You may want to read up on the subject before you start your flag waving for America. Iraqis do not want Americans there. If you hear otherwise it is from Bush & Co.

You might want to educate yourself and read up on PNAC's agenda (on the web). There you will see that this was all planned well before your infamous Sept. 11 - the day everything changed Laughing . Terrorism didn't begin on Sept. 11; the Israelis practice it on the Palestinians all the time.

If you want to spread democracy why isn't America in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, etc.? Buncha B.S.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 01:57 pm
slkshock7 wrote:
Look...I can cut & paste and insult democrats with absurd stereotypes, just as well as Pachelbel

Quote:

You Might Be A Democrat If
You think "ethics" is an eastern European country.
You've named your kids with hyphenated first and last names.
You've tried to argue that poverty could be abolished if people were only willing to redistribute their wealth.
You've ever referred to someone as a "bigot or Nazi".
You've ever tried to prove Jesus was a married man.
You oppose the death penalty, but support abortion.
You don't support school choice for others, only for yourself.
You think you might remember laughing once as an adult and feeling guilty about it.
You once broke loose at a party and inhaled, but don't admit it.
You support diversity, as long as others agree with you.
You've referred to moral fiber thinking it was a new man made textile.
You've ever uttered the phrase, "you hypocrite".
You've ever said, "the Bill Of Rights is outdated".
You answer to "No One".
You support PETA and Green Peace, but still eat beef, fish, lamb, and wear leather garments.
You protest your neighbor clearing their yard of weeds.
You only let your kids watch PBS and listen to NPR.
You scream at the thought of agreeing with a Republican.
You've argued that Western values are no values.
You agree that all the world's problems can be traced back to white Anglo-Saxon men taking advantage of others.
When people say "Marx," you think, "to bad his idea didn't work".
You've ever yelled, "capitalist".
You still wear the Birkenstocks you purchased in 1969.
You argue that you need 300 laws to control guns.
You really think that guns kill people. Not people kill people.
You want to protest something but don't know what.
You've ever said "I support civil liberties, but not personal liberties."
You will not admit that trees are a renewable resource.
You've ever said "reduce paper, save a tree".
You donate money because it makes you "feel good".
You came of age in the '60s and don't understand what went wrong.
You justify lying cheating Democrats because Republicans lie and cheat.
You ever start or end an argument on the phrase, "you are closed minded".
You never told a child that Oscar the Grouch "lives in a trash can" because he chooses to do so.
You think denial is a virtue.
You don't mind contributing 4 months of your salary to the government. You're only sorry it can't be more.
You believe that everyone else is responsible for you but you.


Source



OOOHHH!!! Goodie for you!! I am neither Repub or Demo, so I couldn't give a rat's arse. You Americans should be for the party that represents the will of the people and isn't into using the Constitution for toilet paper as is Bushie & Co.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 02:13 pm
oralloy said
Quote:
It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.


Yes, please.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 02:35 pm
blatham wrote:
oralloy said
Quote:
It is almost as if they want Bush to whip out a machinegun and do personal battle with any assassins who come his way.


Yes, please.



If Bush shoots a gun off as well as he shoots off his mouth he'll do real well. Laughing

If you want to check out some hilarious pictures of Bush & Co. google:
politicalhumor.about.com
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 03:14 pm
Pachelbel wrote:
OOOHHH!!! Goodie for you!! I am neither Repub or Demo, so I couldn't give a rat's arse. You Americans should be for the party that represents the will of the people and isn't into using the Constitution for toilet paper as is Bushie & Co.


Well, well, well...pretty touchy for someone who has no dog in this fight. Tell you what, concern yourself with your country...we'll do the same with ours.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 03:16 pm
The obvious purpose of threads such as this is to jerk someon's chain.


It seems to have worked.
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 03:26 pm
George Bush is a Republican President, but he isn't the Republican Party. you lot can go on whining and blaming the man for everything you dislike, but he will remain President and will carry out the duties and responsiblities given him be the Constitution. He is man with distinct limitations, but I really doubt that Gore or Kerry could have/would have done any better under the circumstances. "He talks funny!", what a stinging indictment. "He comes from a wealthy family", as most Presidents have done. Accusations that the President is Evil incarnate and either the tool of a vast conspiracy or the head of it, is just plain looney. The President isn't asleep at the wheel, but he has had his share of setbacks and mistakes.

Republicans today are unabashed flagwavers, and that is made to sound nasty by some folks. Republicans place high value on personal responsibility, and defend the idea that an individual should keep and spend what they've earned. Republicans value a strong economy as the surest means of providing work for as many people as want it. Republicans respect each individual's religious convictions, and appreciate the role religion has played in our nation's history. Republicans appeal to the center of American thought and opinion, rather than the elites or extremes. Republicans do tend to be older, and they tend to be more supportive of Federal authority. I am a Republican today because the GOP stands closer to the Federalists like Washington and Adams. The Federalists designed a strong central government constrained by the Constitution.

Democrats today are the heirs of the anti-Federalists, and Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans. Their political philosophy was, and is that strong government is an evil thing. This is the condition that existed after the Revolution, and it was a disaster. In parts of the country citizens only accepted those laws they approved of, and ignored the rest. There were moves to redistribute the wealth so that even patriots who had risked everything were faced with mobs demanding that they give up their property. People like Jefferson didn't want to give up being little kings on their plantations, and preached a political philosophy that perpetrated that system. The Democrats appealed to the People, who were largely without property and evolved into the mob that made Andy Jackson so popular. Democrats remained almost unchallenged in power until 1861, when a Republican was elected and the Democratic South tried to break up the Union.

Today the legacy of FADER and LBJ are the big Democratic heros. Democrats now are dedicated to using the Federal government to advance their social engineering efforts, but still blanch at the idea that the opposition party has the People's votes. Political Correctness, entitlements, and government by popular acclaim seem to be the predominant Democratic platform. When we hear shrill denunciations of our military, it is usually from the left, from Democrats who would rather see the administration smeared than that our military efforts to secure the peace should succeed.

The other day on this forum we had a thread celebrating American Independance. Some seized the opportunity to list and denounce the United States. Every historical crime and blunder has trotted out, and those posts often reeked with hatred for our country and its flag. How many of those who denounce our country were Republicans, and how many were Democrats, or their Socialist buddies?
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jul, 2006 11:03 pm
slkshock7 wrote:
Pachelbel wrote:
OOOHHH!!! Goodie for you!! I am neither Repub or Demo, so I couldn't give a rat's arse. You Americans should be for the party that represents the will of the people and isn't into using the Constitution for toilet paper as is Bushie & Co.


Well, well, well...pretty touchy for someone who has no dog in this fight. Tell you what, concern yourself with your country...we'll do the same with ours.



It would be nice, real nice, if your country would concern itself with its OWN business, but it seems to like to stick its nose into other countries business, now doesn't it? Bullies on the block, is what America is. Cool
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » [B]What It Means To Be A Republican[/B]
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 12:34:33