0
   

Who's booty you kissing?

Forums: Spirituality And Religion, Religion, Debate
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 07:08 pm
hephzibah wrote:
So... Frank, Ty, tell me how I would benefit greatly? I sincerely would like to know what the benefits of not believing in God would be.


Sorry - I know I wasn't asked, but...

You'd reclaim the captaincy of your own boat, and the mastery of your own destiny, by george. <insert haughty harumph>
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 07:10 pm
hephzibah wrote:
So... Frank, Ty, tell me how I would benefit greatly? I sincerely would like to know what the benefits of not believing in God would be.


I'd venture to say...the same benefit that you'd get from not believing in Santa Clause.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 07:47 pm
Which is what Jason?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 07:58 pm
How about moral license?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:03 pm
hephzibah wrote:
Which is what Jason?


What do you think?
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:03 pm
What do you mean neo?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:04 pm
neologist wrote:
How about moral license?


What the heck do you mean by this?
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:04 pm
You already know what I think Jason, so why don't you tell me what you think? Really... what are the benefits of not believing in God? Obviously there must be something, right?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:08 pm
If we don't believe in God, we are no longer under obligation to him and are free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.

Wait!


Didn't someone say that already?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:10 pm
neologist wrote:
How about moral license?
So I get to write my own licence when I go to the moral office in my ethical-mobile Smile
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:11 pm
snood wrote:
hephzibah wrote:
So... Frank, Ty, tell me how I would benefit greatly? I sincerely would like to know what the benefits of not believing in God would be.


Sorry - I know I wasn't asked, but...

You'd reclaim the captaincy of your own boat, and the mastery of your own destiny, by george. <insert haughty harumph>


Snood your comments are welcome here as well. So that haughty harumph is sarcastic I take it?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:15 pm
neologist wrote:
If we don't believe in God, we are no longer under obligation to him and are free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.
In order for your assertion to have validly the reverse must also be true:

If you do believe in God, you are under obligation to him and are not free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.

Show me how a Mafioso hit man does this by repenting.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:15 pm
hephzibah wrote:
You already know what I think Jason, so why don't you tell me what you think? Really... what are the benefits of not believing in God? Obviously there must be something, right?


Can't you read, heph? I said "the same benefit that you'd get from not believing in Santa Clause."
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:15 pm
Chumly wrote:
neologist wrote:
How about moral license?
So I get to write my own licence when I go to the moral office in my ethical-mobile Smile
You betcha.

Just blow yer horn when yer drivin down my street.


'K?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:16 pm
neologist wrote:
If we don't believe in God, we are no longer under obligation to him and are free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.

Wait!


Didn't someone say that already?


What is "good" and what is "bad," according to your god, neo?
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:18 pm
I'm not so sure I'm the one having trouble reading here Jason.

hephzibah wrote:
Which is what Jason?


Are you going to answer the question or not?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:19 pm
Chumly wrote:
neologist wrote:
If we don't believe in God, we are no longer under obligation to him and are free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.
In order for your assertion to have validly the reverse must also be true:

If you do believe in God, you are under obligation to him and are not free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.

Show me how a Mafioso hit man does this by repenting.
The converse is true.

The Mafioso will have much explaining to do.

As will those who may incorrectly use their license.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:28 pm
hephzibah wrote:
I'm not so sure I'm the one having trouble reading here Jason.

hephzibah wrote:
Which is what Jason?


Are you going to answer the question or not?


I kinda know that you have a brain, heph. Just throw me a guess. You can do it! What is the benefit in knowing that Santa Clause doens't really exist? This answer is quite obvious, Heph.

Do you want me to do all the thinking for you? That's not fair, child.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:39 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
neologist wrote:
If we don't believe in God, we are no longer under obligation to him and are free to decide for ourselves what is good and what is bad.

Wait!


Didn't someone say that already?


What is "good" and what is "bad," according to your god, neo?
Good is coming home after a long day.
Bad is finding the toilet overflowed.

Good is a sizzlin' steak
Bad is the steak after Fido gets hold of it.

Etc.

Etc.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Mar, 2006 08:49 pm
Time for the relativistic teaser Smile
neologist wrote:
Good is coming home after a long day.

Not from the perspective of your wife's lover hiding in the clothes closet!
neologist wrote:
Bad is finding the toilet overflowed.

Not from the perspective of the plumber's income!
neologist wrote:
Good is a sizzlin' steak.

Not from the perspective of the cow that had to die.
neologist wrote:
Bad is the steak after Fido gets hold of it.

Not from the perspective of Fido's taste buds!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
Family files lawsuit against school over Jesus - Discussion by Baldimo
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Who's booty you kissing?
  3. » Page 16
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 03:13:29
▲ ▼