1
   

what is the difference

 
 
bubu
 
Reply Wed 15 Feb, 2006 06:33 pm
Hello!!

What is the difference between:

Australia is in the south
Australia is on the south
Australia is at the south

Thank you
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 741 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Wy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 10:38 am
Good morning, Bubu.
I'll try...
"...in the south" -- the south is an area, and Australia is in this area. Without adding any other words, this is the most appropriate English sentence.

"...on the south" -- this construction would mostly be used a little differently, perhaps as, "The city is on the south side of the river." It implies an area also, but an area with a boundary.

"...at the south" -- Again, a little different: "Bubu is at the south end of the field." The implication is a specific location, not a more general area.

With both "on" and "at," you must specify "south of what" -- when you say "Australia is on (or at) the south" your English-speaking listener will wonder "south of what?"

Hope this helps!
0 Replies
 
bubu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 12:36 pm
It did really help a lot.

Thank you very much.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » what is the difference
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 01:41:30