1
   

Love Triangle: Gannon-Guckert, Scottie McClellan, Karl Rove

 
 
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 12:33 am
So who was Gannon-Guckert hooking up with on all those private visits to the White House? Janeane Garafolo says it is most likely MCClellan and Rove. Sounds good to me. McClellan is not foolong anyone and Rove exhibits all the traits of a classic closet case.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,866 • Replies: 64
No top replies

 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 09:27 am
Fag-baiting, even in a noble cause, is still reprehensible.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 09:36 am
how exactly does one fag bait? Pull out your unit and walk the streets? I thought that was trolling....
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 09:44 am
Just a reminder, we oppose the principles and methods of this administration, not who or how they boink each other.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 10:05 am
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
how exactly does one fag bait? Pull out your unit and walk the streets? I thought that was trolling....

That all depends on who you expect to attract with your display.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 10:15 am
Joe Nation wrote:
Just a reminder, we oppose the principles and methods of this administration, not who or how they boink each other.


We????????????

The issue is hypocrisy not who is boinking whom.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 10:16 am
Then why bring in a sexuality factor Roxxxanne?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 10:26 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Just a reminder, we oppose the principles and methods of this administration, not who or how they boink each other.


We????????????

The issue is hypocrisy not who is boinking whom.


What is so hard to understand. Progressives don't care what a politician does sexually unless it is someone who lashes out at gays in spite of, or actually because of, his own homosexuality.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 10:31 am
And once more Roxxxanne fails to answer the question.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 11:29 am
I answered the question. You just have a comprehension problem.

If say, James Dobson, was found to have had a gay affair that would be big news. Because it would expose blatant hypocrisy. The same would apply to those in the Bush administration who are closet cases.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 11:54 am
The only closet I suspect the cronies of the Bush Administration are in is a dark, dank little room filled with various disguises. Gannon-Guckert would sleep with them only if they open up their checkbook.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 12:24 pm
So far, it is Karly Boy is a landslide.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 12:24 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
I answered the question. You just have a comprehension problem.

If say, James Dobson, was found to have had a gay affair that would be big news. Because it would expose blatant hypocrisy. The same would apply to those in the Bush administration who are closet cases.

And if you had any actual evidence that someone in the Bush administration was a "closet case," then you might be excused.

But you don't.

Instead, you have salacious innuendo and baseless smear. And as long as people continue to engage in this kind of fag-baiting, others will continue to think that it is acceptable to view homosexuality as shameful and detestable.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 12:33 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
I answered the question. You just have a comprehension problem.

If say, James Dobson, was found to have had a gay affair that would be big news. Because it would expose blatant hypocrisy. The same would apply to those in the Bush administration who are closet cases.

And if you had any actual evidence that someone in the Bush administration was a "closet case," then you might be excused.

But you don't.

Instead, you have salacious innuendo and baseless smear. And as long as people continue to engage in this kind of fag-baiting, others will continue to think that it is acceptable to view homosexuality as shameful and detestable.


Closet cases are going to continue to think that homosexuality is shameful and detestable. That is their problem, not mine.


Are you seriously trying to tell me that you think EVERYONE in the Bush Administration is hetero-sexual??? That is almost a statistical impossibility especially when one considers that lashing out at gays is a sure sign of latent homosexuality.

Then we need to consider the Gannon-Guckert factor. Where there is a smoke there is fire.



The speculation that Gannon-Guckert was involved with someone in the WH is, by no means, baseless.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 01:00 pm
You've only got a suspicion that's been formed by rumor. Not really worth exploring. It's really old news that I, for one, am not willing to dwell on.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 01:03 pm
(The adminstration has far more egregious transgressions to answer up for).
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 01:08 pm
Roxxxane,

Although I would think it was ironic that one of these people is a closet case while bashing gays (much like Hoover), it isn't one of those things I would want to make a big deal about.

Anon
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 01:37 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
So far, it is Karly Boy is a landslide.


...and still you wonder why nobody will ever take you seriously.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 01:57 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
Closet cases are going to continue to think that homosexuality is shameful and detestable. That is their problem, not mine.

In attempting to malign people by insinuating that they are homosexuals, you imply that homosexuality is shameful and detestable. That is your problem.

Roxxxanne wrote:
Are you seriously trying to tell me that you think EVERYONE in the Bush Administration is hetero-sexual???

No, I'm not seriously trying to tell you that. I'm not even humorously trying to tell you that. I have absolutely no interest in the sex lives of the members of the Bush administration, and I can imagine no reason to become interested.

Roxxxanne wrote:
That is almost a statistical impossibility especially when one considers that lashing out at gays is a sure sign of latent homosexuality.

Freudian nonsense, not to mention logically suspect.

Roxxxanne wrote:
Then we need to consider the Gannon-Guckert factor. Where there is a smoke there is fire.

No, sometimes where there's smoke there's just smoke. Or, in the words of Freud, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Roxxxanne wrote:
The speculation that Gannon-Guckert was involved with someone in the WH is, by no means, baseless.

Of course it is, otherwise you wouldn't call it "speculation."
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Feb, 2006 03:00 pm
Although I think there is some tongue-in-cheek humor involved with the thread, it's not even entertaining.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Love Triangle: Gannon-Guckert, Scottie McClellan, Karl Rove
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 11:47:21