30
   

Do i have the power to end a thread? ^^

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 02:24 pm
What(questiommark)
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 03:52 pm
Region Philbis wrote:
who trusts Thread-Enders?




(don't answer -- it's a rhetorical question...)


Don't answer? Dream on you silly single-celled entity.

Your question is moot. We don't got no thread-enders here.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 03:59 pm
... and your double-negative is doubly, duly noted herein...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 04:00 pm
Roberta wrote:
Region Philbis wrote:
who trusts Thread-Enders?




(don't answer -- it's a rhetorical question...)


Don't answer? Dream on you silly single-celled entity.

Your question is moot. We don't got no thread-enders here.



Do.you.realize.how.womderful.the.comimatiom.of.alliteratiom.amd
assomamce.is.im.that.phrase(questiommark)
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 04:09 pm
dlowan wrote:
Roberta wrote:
Region Philbis wrote:
who trusts Thread-Enders?




(don't answer -- it's a rhetorical question...)


Don't answer? Dream on you silly single-celled entity.

Your question is moot. We don't got no thread-enders here.



Do.you.realize.how.womderful.the.comimatiom.of.alliteratiom.amd
assomamce.is.im.that.phrase(questiommark)



Assonance? Alliteration? Da goim don't know nuttin'. He's too busy picking on me and my double negatives.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:28 pm
Roberta wrote:
dlowan wrote:
Roberta wrote:
Region Philbis wrote:
who trusts Thread-Enders?




(don't answer -- it's a rhetorical question...)


Don't answer? Dream on you silly single-celled entity.

Your question is moot. We don't got no thread-enders here.



Do.you.realize.how.womderful.the.comimatiom.of.alliteratiom.amd
assomamce.is.im.that.phrase(questiommark)



Assonance? Alliteration? Da goim don't know nuttin'. He's too busy picking on me and my double negatives.



That is why he is a mere goim, and you are a ravishing and wondrously complex mammal....
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:29 pm
Mammon ain't so hot.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:31 pm
patiodog wrote:
Mammon ain't so hot.


I just bet you think mammaries are, though.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:42 pm
They're the bees' knees.

They're the wasps' nipples.






I dare say they are almost as fine as a finely formed pair of buttocks mounted on a broad pelvis. Almost.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:00 pm
patiodog wrote:
They're the bees' knees.

They're the wasps' nipples.






I dare say they are almost as fine as a finely formed pair of buttocks mounted on a broad pelvis. Almost.



Garn.


Go hump a double bass.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:14 pm
Of course, howsoever fine the tulips may be, they're nothing without strong long stems...
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:15 pm
Flower porn????? Confused
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:29 pm
STOP, THREAD!
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:31 pm
I reported it , Kicky in a dramatic attempt to be the last before it was wiped away, but apparently flower porn is not a violation of A2K mores....alas. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:44 pm
Hey!

Someone gotta new keyboard.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:45 pm
LEGAL:

This thread is hereby declared officially ended after this post, and therefore, all further posts henceforth, shall, in post ad corpus interuptus maladruptus snuffalupagus be deemed, as such, posts included on a whole new thread for the purposes of the first thread, through the power vested in this entity, amen, hallelujah, cross my heart, hope to die, stick a needle in my eye in perpetuiti, ad infinitum, e pluribus unum.

In so doing, this post will forever be considered the post that ended the thread, and the post's author, one, "Kickycan," shall heretofore retain sole ownership of the title of "The Guy Who Stopped That Thread That One Time."

Fin
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:47 pm
That sure looks legal.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:51 pm
Says my attorney Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Sglass
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:53 pm
See Kicky, no one listens to you. No respect. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:24 am
kickycan wrote:
LEGAL:

This thread is hereby declared officially ended after this post, and therefore, all further posts henceforth, shall, in post ad corpus interuptus maladruptus snuffalupagus be deemed, as such, posts included on a whole new thread for the purposes of the first thread, through the power vested in this entity, amen, hallelujah, cross my heart, hope to die, stick a needle in my eye in perpetuiti, ad infinitum, e pluribus unum.

In so doing, this post will forever be considered the post that ended the thread, and the post's author, one, "Kickycan," shall heretofore retain sole ownership of the title of "The Guy Who Stopped That Thread That One Time."

Fin



Bull feathers
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Oddities and Humor - Discussion by edgarblythe
Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Caption The Cartoon - Discussion by panzade
Geek and Nerd Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Caption The Cartoon Part Deux - Discussion by panzade
IS IT OK FOR ME TO CHEAT? - Question by Setanta
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 08:37:54