dlowan wrote: Yes, I probably ought to have told Thomas, since he is moving to the US, that "buns" also refers to the human gluteus maximus, and to the...er...umm...wabbit.
Thanks for telling me. Am I correct in supposing that if I were to walk into a Texas diner and tell the waitress, "Boy you've got some great buns around here!", that would be considered bad form?
Thomas wrote:dlowan wrote: Yes, I probably ought to have told Thomas, since he is moving to the US, that "buns" also refers to the human gluteus maximus, and to the...er...umm...wabbit.
Thanks for telling me. Am I correct in supposing that if I were to walk into a Texas diner and tell the waitress, "Boy you've got some great buns around here!", that would be considered bad form?
I believe so, unless you were staring at a pile of the flour, or wabbit, type buns at the time.
I'll try to remember that.
Thomas wrote:I'll try to remember that.
Do.
Here's examples of the innocent type piles of buns:
Here's the type you hafta be careful of:
Does that mean that one can use bunny as an adjective?
one could... but if you wanna cut to the chase, "butt-cheeky" might work better...
Francis wrote:Does that mean that one can use bunny as an adjective?
I wuld think about that VERY carefully if I were you.
Region Philbis wrote:why shuld he exactly?
I might become provoked.
Since when do you spell like OmSig?
Region Philbis wrote:dlowan wrote:Since when do you spell like OmSig?
i thought
youwanted to...
So...IF you thought I wanted you to you'd jump off a building?
bunny, that's a tad extreme, no?
but if i thought you wanted me to, i would jump off a building for you... a 4 foot high building... just for you...
(technically speaking, you said "IF")
Region Philbis wrote:(technically speaking, you said "IF")
It was not technically.
It was a big, fat, hairy goddamn "if".
Yeah, but you made it with worn-out tools...
How much did it cost to you?
This discussion doesn't strike me as very pointful. Why don't we just end the thread and move on?
