JESUS HAS AN ANUS

RexRed wrote:

Raul-7 wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
Yes, Jesus is the Son of God.

Stop with your ignorance and accept the truth.

And when Allah will say, 'O Issa son of Maryam! Did you tell to people, 'make me and my mother two gods besides Allah'? He will submit 'bellowed be You, it is not justified for me that I should tell the thing to which I have no reach. 'If I had said that You would surely have known it You know what is in my heart and I do not know what is in Your knowledge. Undoubtedly, it is You only, Knower of, all hidden things. (5:116)

I said not to them but that which You had commanded me that worship Allah my Lord and your Lord, and I knew of them as long as I remained in them, then when You took me up, then You were the Watcher over them, and every thing is, present before You. (5:117)

If You punish them, they are Your bondmen, and if You forgive them, then undoubtedly, You are only the Dominant, the Wise. (5:118)

Raul

If you were not so insulting people might be more inclined to explain to you why they "believe" the way they do...

Jesus is the son of God because, God created a sperm in the womb of Mary... Or are you saying Mary created the sperm herself? Or are you saying God cannot create or Jesus was not conceived of a virgin?

Like a hen and an egg... if the rooster does not fertilize the egg it will NEVER grow into a living creature. Have you ever opened your refrigerator and found the eggs hatching? Life is passed on through generations from male to male. So it was the life part in Jesus that did not come from Adam but God... Jesus Christ was the second Adam. Jesus took the part of the body/flesh from the woman (egg) and the life/blood that made the egg come alive came from God. This life is in the blood of every human being but it can ONLY be passed on from the male of our species.

Flesh and blood... The flesh/egg came from the woman and the blood/life came from God. If Mary was a virgin when she conceived then this life part had to have come from God...

We are ALL partakers of flesh and blood (from Adam and Eve) but Jesus only took a part... which part did he take? The flesh part. It was the sin in the blood (that was atoned for by the blood of lambs) that he did not receive from Adam. This was why he was free from the original sin.

FROM THE BIBLE

Heb 2:14
Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

Comment:
Jesus was not a partaker of flesh and blood but only took part. What part did he take? The flesh part from the woman (egg) and the blood part from God (life).

Maybe if you didn't talk about flushing the HOLY Bible down the toilet and actually took some time to read it with an open mind you might understand why people BELIEVE Christ Jesus was the son of God (not God). Rather than just listening blindly to what you are told by people who obviously don't know what they are talking about, try to have an original thought of your own... It is ok to think for yourself you know... that is why God gave you a brain...

1Co 15:22
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

1Co 15:45
And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

Le 17:11
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

Ro 6:23
For the wages of sin [the original sin in the blood passed on from Adam] is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

BUT NOT IN THE "LITERAL" OR BIOLOGICAL SENSE. yes it was God that placed the sperm inside of marry's womb, and jesus never had a father, his birth was a miracle by God. so he looked up to God as a father. but christians are LOST because they believe God has begotten a son. far exalted is he from having a son. your giving God human attributes, you fool, why cant you think beyond that? nothing is impossible for God almighty even making a woman have a baby without a father. if it wasnt for God jesus wouldnt exist, and even if he did, noone wouldve given a **** about him, cuz he wouldnt be able to raise the dead or etc... it was all through God almighty, it was ALL by God almighty's WILL.

0 Replies

THINK BEYOND WHAT YOU DO, YOU GOT UR HEAD WRAPPED UP IN YOUR OWN BIBLE, READ OTHER BOOKS, IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THE QURAN, READ BOOKS BY SCIENCE THAT PROVE ALL OF YOUR BIBLE WRONG.

0 Replies

Raul-7 wrote:

sonnot be considered a son. Simple basic logic... This is why God was the paternal creator of the life/soul "part" of Jesus... Jesus was born out of the womb without the interaction with a "man"... The Quran makes no claim that Adam was born out of the womb...

So if you want to confuse the principles by quibbling over the old ENGLISH word begetteth when the original words in the original tongue they were both composed in may differ slightly in meaning. They may not even be talking about the same word or thing..

Do you really think the Quran is saying Jesus was not born from the womb? No...
So what is your point? You don't have one yet you seem to be filled with such certainty and rank insult... It is all misinterpretation of the true meanings... You have handled the Quran recklessly. Why I can only guess to promote hatred and division over things that do not even exist...

Jesus IS the son of God... whether he was begotten or whatever is not the issue because the egg came alive (as if a father had fertilized it) and he was conceived of a virgin... Yet he did not come from the life "passed on" from male to male from Adam.

So maybe you should rethink this stuff you have been "taught"... because neither the Quran nor the Bible support your assertions.

0 Replies

ali87 wrote:

THINK BEYOND WHAT YOU DO, YOU GOT UR HEAD WRAPPED UP IN YOUR OWN BIBLE, READ OTHER BOOKS, IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THE QURAN, READ BOOKS BY SCIENCE THAT PROVE ALL OF YOUR BIBLE WRONG.

Yea other people who have handled and understood the Quran wrong have said this and that.... They think they are so scientific but they are only guessing to fit their hate. They look at things literally when the are figurative and vise versa.. and you want me to read what? I think I will stick to the original texts of both books and you can read their mistakes in these other books if you want... You can read their division and hate your brother if you want....... I choose to see the unity and love my brother instead.

Peace with God...

0 Replies

Well, if Jesus is god why he doesnt know when will doomsday be? He said in (Mathew 24:36):

"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the son, but only the father."

I think that god should know everything in the world, the past, the present and the future, right?

In this statement he assured that even the Holy Spirit doesnt know about the day!

So both Jesus and the HS arent complete, so how they should be considered as gods?!

In (Mathew 12:18): "Here is my servant whom I have chosen,..."

Is it reasonable that god call another god "my servant"?! Choosing this particular word indicates that God doesnt consider Jesus as an equal god or even a son, but rather a human servant.

Besides, even if J. was called son of god in the Gospels, this doesnt make him necessarily a god because Jacob or Israel was called son of god too in the Bible. Plz read (Exodus 4:22): "Thus saith the Lord, Israel is my son, even my firstborn."

King David was called son of god too in the Bible: (psalm 2:7)

Solomon too: (II Sam. 7:13-14)

Even Ephraim: (Jermiah 31:9)

Common People: (Deut. 14:1); (Romans 8:29); (Mathew 5:45-48); and (II Connthians 6:18)

So to be called son of god in the Bible this doesnt prove that J. is a god.

0 Replies

There seem to be a number of A2K members who are not going to be invited to an ecumenical breakfast.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

ali87 wrote:
THINK BEYOND WHAT YOU DO, YOU GOT UR HEAD WRAPPED UP IN YOUR OWN BIBLE, READ OTHER BOOKS, IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THE QURAN, READ BOOKS BY SCIENCE THAT PROVE ALL OF YOUR BIBLE WRONG.

Yea other people who have handled and understood the Quran wrong have said this and that.... They think they are so scientific but they are only guessing to fit their hate. They look at things literally when the are figurative and vise versa.. and you want me to read what? I think I will stick to the original texts of both books and you can read their mistakes in these other books if you want... You can read their division and hate your brother if you want....... I choose to see the unity and love my brother instead.

Peace with God...

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!

0 Replies

ali87 wrote:

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!

you use juvenile thought and language. infantile actually. Go back to the mosque and pray God will supply the instruction manual for the brain he gave you.

0 Replies

ali87 wrote:

RexRed wrote:
ali87 wrote:
THINK BEYOND WHAT YOU DO, YOU GOT UR HEAD WRAPPED UP IN YOUR OWN BIBLE, READ OTHER BOOKS, IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THE QURAN, READ BOOKS BY SCIENCE THAT PROVE ALL OF YOUR BIBLE WRONG.

Yea other people who have handled and understood the Quran wrong have said this and that.... They think they are so scientific but they are only guessing to fit their hate. They look at things literally when the are figurative and vise versa.. and you want me to read what? I think I will stick to the original texts of both books and you can read their mistakes in these other books if you want... You can read their division and hate your brother if you want....... I choose to see the unity and love my brother instead.

Peace with God...

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!

Good question! Now you are reasoning and on the true path to righteousness... Smile

If the Bible says the ground is dry, that is true to fact. If it says the ground is thirsty that is figurative. That is attributing human characteristics to the ground.

When the Bible uses a figure of speech it is to emphasize a certain thing. There is a precise science to figures of speech. Yet people interpret the Bible without even considering that God has marked it with keys, sign posts and checks and balances that direct us to the greater wondrous simple truth within.

Someone who is prepared to throw the Bible in the waste basket/toilet will never see this because they have made up their mind that there is nothing to learn believing that it has no inherent integrity. So they have closed their mind to it's spiritual understanding.

They lean to their own understanding rather than the wisdom of the divine.

Jesus called God his father because God fathered the life that was in him...

This same life is in us by way of the spirit. This is why in the old testament the Bible lists many generations... but in the new testament epistle logic, there is only ONE generation and we are all brothers and sisters and Christ Jesus is the first born...

This is the unity and simplicity of the Christian church of the Bible...

We are all in the same generation not because of some family lineage of flesh or a priestly/cleric line but because of the freely given life of Christ within as spiritual seed.

Yet religion today does not know the Bible well, so they confuse Jesus with God and pagan idolatry. THREE GOD'S IS IDOLATRY no matter how you add it up... It is God/Allah who we give the glory to not a man or prophet... Jesus is not God or God the son and never was or can be but he IS "the son of God" and the first born of many brethren... Thus, it is the Christ in us that is the eternal seed and "gift" of God given to ALL those who simply believe...

God is the creator and Christ Jesus is part of the creation... the creation cannot be it's own creator...

Peace with God/Allah Smile

0 Replies

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

ali87 wrote:

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!
you use juvenile thought and language. infantile actually. Go back to the mosque and pray God will supply the instruction manual for the brain he gave you.

Common chill out and let's all reason with unity and tolerance in mind...

Eph 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
ali87 wrote:

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!
you use juvenile thought and language. infantile actually. Go back to the mosque and pray God will supply the instruction manual for the brain he gave you.

Common chill out and let's all reason with unity and tolerance in mind...

Eph 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

you still didnt explain why i should take "the son of god" literally

0 Replies

So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

0 Replies

PPatience wrote:

Well, if Jesus is god why he doesnt know when will doomsday be? He said in (Mathew 24:36):

"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the son, but only the father."

I think that god should know everything in the world, the past, the present and the future, right?

In this statement he assured that even the Holy Spirit doesnt know about the day!

So both Jesus and the HS arent complete, so how they should be considered as gods?!

In (Mathew 12:18): "Here is my servant whom I have chosen,..."

Is it reasonable that god call another god "my servant"?! Choosing this particular word indicates that God doesnt consider Jesus as an equal god or even a son, but rather a human servant.

Besides, even if J. was called son of god in the Gospels, this doesnt make him necessarily a god because Jacob or Israel was called son of god too in the Bible. Plz read (Exodus 4:22): "Thus saith the Lord, Israel is my son, even my firstborn."

King David was called son of god too in the Bible: (psalm 2:7)

Solomon too: (II Sam. 7:13-14)

Even Ephraim: (Jermiah 31:9)

Common People: (Deut. 14:1); (Romans 8:29); (Mathew 5:45-48); and (II Connthians 6:18)

So to be called son of god in the Bible this doesnt prove that J. is a god.

Jesus Christ is not God... This mystery of the trinity is a lie from pagan hell. The modern day Christians have misinterpreted the Bible and have allowed pagan idolatry and dogma to infect the sacred 1st century church doctrines...

Jesus was the son of God but NOT God the son... because of this many Christians are oblivious to the divinity of Christ as a part of the true God's "creation"...

True Jesus Christ did not know when the end of the world was to happen...

He just knew there would be wars...

He also did not know much of his own fate until God showed him the glory to come...

He also prayed to God... was he praying to himself? Was Mary the mother of God? Of course not, how foolish!.. Mary was blessed by God not herself... Was Jesus both his own father and the son?
The trinity makes no sense because it is man made from pagan Babylon..

When Jesus was DEAD in the grave did he raise himself from the DEAD? If he raised himself from the grave he could not have been legally "dead"...

When God gave Jesus Christ grace why would he give himself something he already had? The list goes on and on... only crippling the integrity and truth of the scriptures...

The Trinity does nothing short of clouding the simplicity of body, soul and spirit. (the three fold human being of which Christ "likewise" took part)

63 times in the Bible Jesus is called the son of God not once is he called God the son... The entire Gospel of John is dedicated to emphasizing the truth that Jesus was the son of God...

Matthew = shepherd king
Mark = servant
Luke = man
John = son of God

Jesus had a body, soul and spirit just as we do... does that make us God?

The Bible says Jesus was with God in the beginning... How? In God's foreknowledge... The Bible also says we were with God too (also in his foreknowledge). Does that make us God? No, certainly not.

The trinity is the same lie the devil tempted Eve with. The devil knew if he could get her to believe she could be "God" he could fool people for the rest of time with the same lie.

Ye shall be as Gods! (the devil told her)

Thou shalt have no other Gods before me (in front of my face)... total contrast...

Trinitarians are worshiping God in idolatry... plain and simple...

Take it from someone who has dedicated most of their life to studying this... the Trinity is a lie from hell and has no Biblical standing...

Trinitarians use vague scriptures and hearsay to prove the grand lie of the devil...

But, in truth, there is only ONE God. Jesus Christ is the "image" of God not the thing that makes/casts the image... and when we put Christ into our spirit/hearts/minds we are changed into the same image...

Peace with God/Allah

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

I all due respect Set,

"King" David was not very moral either... you might look to the bastards in your own back yard first before you point a finger...

0 Replies

ali87 wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
ali87 wrote:

SO YOURE SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY?

SO THEN IF ITS NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY THEN WHY IS IT THAT ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS TODAY BELIEVE JESUS IS GOD'S SON, JUST BECAUSE HE LOOKED UP TO GOD AS A FATHER!!!

SO RU SAYING I SHOULDNT TAKE IT LITERALLY?

IF YOU SAY NO, THEN YOU CLEARLY HAVE A "SELECTIVE MORALITY"
BECAUSE YOU PICK THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOU IGNORE ALL THE FLAWS IN THE BIBLE!!
you use juvenile thought and language. infantile actually. Go back to the mosque and pray God will supply the instruction manual for the brain he gave you.

Common chill out and let's all reason with unity and tolerance in mind...

Eph 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

you still didnt explain why i should take "the son of god" literally

Actually I did buddy...

You need to read and re-read what I wrote about the chicken and egg till it clicks...

God created the (new) life in the egg of Mary...

Thus his "life" was not passed on from Adam like our own...

God contributed to "making" the fetus Jesus Christ. It is physically impossible for a virgin to fertilize her own eggs...

This should be a rather simple concept to grasp, once you remove the trinitarian stuff.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Setanta wrote:
So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

I all due respect Set,

"King" David was not very moral either... you might look to the bastards in your own back yard first before you point a finger...

King David wasn't the purported founder and prophet extraordinaire of any religion either Rex.

0 Replies

What constitutes a human?

Body soul and spirit...

Body = formed from the dust of the ground
Soul = breathed into his nostrils the breath of life
Spirit = created man in his own image

Jesus had all three of these things

these three things are the crux of christianity.

If you do not understand body, soul and spirit you cannot understand the divinity of Christ, the conception of Christ or the new Christian birth...

This failure to understand body, soul and spirt has led to the confusion that has pervaded the church doctrines for centuries.

0 Replies

Questioner wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

I all due respect Set,

"King" David was not very moral either... you might look to the bastards in your own back yard first before you point a finger...

King David wasn't the purported founder and prophet extraordinaire of any religion either Rex.

What about the X-Rated Pornography in the Bible?

When we read the Bible, we learn about some weird pornographic teachings that are certainly not appropriate for anyone with morals to read. Please visit X-Rated Pornography in the Bible to see the many pornographic verses in the Bible. You will read for instance, about Solomon's wife's vagina tastes like wine for him!

You will also see examples of Prophets sleeping with their neighbor's wives, such as the following:

David watches a women bathe, likes what he sees, and "goes in unto her." Let us look at 2 Samuel 11:2-4 "One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, 'Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?' Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home." This Holy Figure in the Bible is a pervert!.

So what happened to "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (From the NIV Bible, Leviticus 20:10)"????

How come Leviticus 20:10 was compromised in the Bible and was never applied to King David?! Didn't King David know about this law? Yet, the Jews use his star as their holy symbol; the David Star, and the Christians call Jesus his son; "Son of David".

It seems to me quite clearly that the Bible is nothing but a compromised corrupted Book as Jeremiah 8:8, 2 Samuel 11:2-4 and Leviticus 20:10 suggest.

If the strong eats the weak in the Bible, then what moral and wisdom are we to learn from this book?

0 Replies

ali87 wrote:

Questioner wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

I all due respect Set,

"King" David was not very moral either... you might look to the bastards in your own back yard first before you point a finger...

King David wasn't the purported founder and prophet extraordinaire of any religion either Rex.

What about the X-Rated Pornography in the Bible?

When we read the Bible, we learn about some weird pornographic teachings that are certainly not appropriate for anyone with morals to read. Please visit X-Rated Pornography in the Bible to see the many pornographic verses in the Bible. You will read for instance, about Solomon's wife's vagina tastes like wine for him!

You will also see examples of Prophets sleeping with their neighbor's wives, such as the following:

David watches a women bathe, likes what he sees, and "goes in unto her." Let us look at 2 Samuel 11:2-4 "One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, 'Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?' Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home." This Holy Figure in the Bible is a pervert!.

So what happened to "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (From the NIV Bible, Leviticus 20:10)"????

How come Leviticus 20:10 was compromised in the Bible and was never applied to King David?! Didn't King David know about this law? Yet, the Jews use his star as their holy symbol; the David Star, and the Christians call Jesus his son; "Son of David".

It seems to me quite clearly that the Bible is nothing but a compromised corrupted Book as Jeremiah 8:8, 2 Samuel 11:2-4 and Leviticus 20:10 suggest.

If the strong eats the weak in the Bible, then what moral and wisdom are we to learn from this book?

Well, I think the bible is as large a crock of sh*t as the 'noble quaran', so feel free to keep insulting it.

0 Replies

Questioner wrote:

ali87 wrote:
Questioner wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
So, Ali, you have never explained why we should take the child-rapist Mohammed seriously . . .

I all due respect Set,

"King" David was not very moral either... you might look to the bastards in your own back yard first before you point a finger...

King David wasn't the purported founder and prophet extraordinaire of any religion either Rex.

What about the X-Rated Pornography in the Bible?

When we read the Bible, we learn about some weird pornographic teachings that are certainly not appropriate for anyone with morals to read. Please visit X-Rated Pornography in the Bible to see the many pornographic verses in the Bible. You will read for instance, about Solomon's wife's vagina tastes like wine for him!

You will also see examples of Prophets sleeping with their neighbor's wives, such as the following:

David watches a women bathe, likes what he sees, and "goes in unto her." Let us look at 2 Samuel 11:2-4 "One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, 'Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?' Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home." This Holy Figure in the Bible is a pervert!.

So what happened to "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death. (From the NIV Bible, Leviticus 20:10)"????

How come Leviticus 20:10 was compromised in the Bible and was never applied to King David?! Didn't King David know about this law? Yet, the Jews use his star as their holy symbol; the David Star, and the Christians call Jesus his son; "Son of David".

It seems to me quite clearly that the Bible is nothing but a compromised corrupted Book as Jeremiah 8:8, 2 Samuel 11:2-4 and Leviticus 20:10 suggest.

If the strong eats the weak in the Bible, then what moral and wisdom are we to learn from this book?

Well, I think the bible is as large a crock of sh*t as the 'noble quaran', so feel free to keep insulting it.

THEN HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THIS:

life was originated from water:

"He it is Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days - and His Throne was over the waters - that He might try you, which of you is best in conduct. But if thou wert to say to them, "Ye shall indeed be raised up after death", the Unbelievers would be sure to say, "This is nothing but obvious sorcery!" (The Noble Quran, 11:7)"

"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (The Noble Quran, 21:30)"

"It is He Who has created man from water: then has He established relationships of lineage and marriage: for thy Lord has power (over all things). (The Noble Quran, 25:54)"

"And God has created every animal from water: of them there are some that creep on their bellies; some that walk on two legs; and some that walk on four. God creates what He wills for verily God has power over all things. (The Noble Quran, 24:45

HOW COULD A MAN HAVE THIS KNOWLEDGE 1400 YEARS AGO IF IT ALL WAS A CROCK OF ****?

0 Replies

JESUS HAS AN ANUS

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know