Reply
Mon 23 Jan, 2006 11:03 am
Not. Backing. Hillary.
by Molly Ivins - Creators Syndicate
01.20.06
AUSTIN, Texas
I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president.
Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone. This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges.
The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief.
If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it. In 1968, Gene McCarthy was the little boy who said out loud, "Look, the emperor isn't wearing any clothes." Bobby Kennedy ?- rough, tough Bobby Kennedy ?- didn't do it. Just this quiet man trained by Benedictines who liked to quote poetry.
What kind of courage does it take, for mercy's sake? The majority of the American people (55 percent) think the war in Iraq is a mistake and that we should get out. The majority (65 percent) of the American people want single-payer health care and are willing to pay more taxes to get it. The majority (86 percent) of the American people favor raising the minimum wage. The majority of the American people (60 percent) favor repealing Bush's tax cuts, or at least those that go only to the rich. The majority (66 percent) wants to reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending, but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes.
The majority (77 percent) thinks we should do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment. The majority (87 percent) thinks big oil companies are gouging consumers and would support a windfall profits tax. That is the center, you fools. WHO ARE YOU AFRAID OF?
I listen to people like Rahm Emanuel superciliously explaining elementary politics to us clueless naifs outside the Beltway ("First, you have to win elections.") Can't you even read the damn polls?
Here's a prize example by someone named Barry Casselman, who writes, "There is an invisible civil war in the Democratic Party, and it is between those who are attempting to satisfy the defeatist and pacifist left base of the party and those who are attempting to prepare the party for successful elections in 2006 and 2008."
This supposedly pits Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, emboldened by "a string of bad news from the Middle East ... into calling for premature retreat from Iraq," versus those pragmatic folk like Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emmanuel, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman.
Oh come on, people ?- get a grip on the concept of leadership. Look at this war ?- from the lies that led us into it, to the lies they continue to dump on us daily.
You sit there in Washington so frightened of the big, bad Republican machine you have no idea what people are thinking. I'm telling you right now, Tom DeLay is going to lose in his district. If Democrats in Washington haven't got enough sense to OWN the issue of political reform, I give up on them entirely.
Do it all, go long, go for public campaign financing for Congress. I'm serious as a stroke about this ?- that is the only reform that will work, and you know it, as well as everyone else who's ever studied this. Do all the goo-goo stuff everybody has made fun of all these years: embrace redistricting reform, electoral reform, House rules changes, the whole package. Put up, or shut up. Own this issue, or let Jack Abramoff politics continue to run your town.
Bush, Cheney and Co. will continue to play the patriotic bully card just as long as you let them. I've said it before: War brings out the patriotic bullies. In World War I, they went around kicking dachshunds on the grounds that dachshunds were "German dogs." They did not, however, go around kicking German shepherds. The MINUTE someone impugns your patriotism for opposing this war, turn on them like a snarling dog and explain what loving your country really means. That, or you could just piss on them elegantly, as Rep. John Murtha did. Or eviscerate them with wit (look up Mark Twain on the war in the Philippines). Or point out the latest in the endless "string of bad news."
Do not sit there cowering and pretending the only way to win is as Republican-lite. If the Washington-based party can't get up and fight, we'll find someone who can.
That is a good editorial and well said.
But we have been saying that at A2K for a long time. Molly isn't a member, is she?
Have to say I agree with Molly on this one...
<Nods>
Thanks for citing the column, BBB.
Why be so apparent? Let the Republicans try to divine what the Democrats are up to. Let them think there is an internal war. In football you try to deceive the opposition to think one way and you then play the other way. Why let the republicans think that all Democrats are for leaving Iraq? Republicans have so far outplayed Democrats for they made things appear one way and when Democrats geared themselves to respond they did otherwise and had Democrats with eggs on their faces.
James Carville's new book "Take It Back" is along the same lines. The quip I picked up from him the other morning on the radio was that "Democrats need to grow a spine." and it falls in line with Ivins' piece.
Right or wrong, to mean much of anything in politics you have to stand for something. Wavering doens't get much traction.
of course it does fishin', just take a gander at the bush immigration policy.
Bush isn't running for office. He managed to hold together a consistant message on it when he was running.
fishin' wrote:James Carville's new book "Take It Back" is along the same lines. The quip I picked up from him the other morning on the radio was that "Democrats need to grow a spine." and it falls in line with Ivins' piece.
Right or wrong, to mean much of anything in politics you have to stand for something. Wavering doens't get much traction.
Yeh, I for one would like to know what it is? Do any of you know?
Oh, they are doing a jig in Elephant Town!
Hillary is the equivalent of not only Joe Biden, but Joe Lieberman?!!!
What firebrand is worthy of going down in flames against McCain in 2008?
Recent polls show McCain kicking Hillary's ass in a presidential race run tomorrow. What would he do against Howard Dean or Nancy Pelosi?
Memo to Molly Ivens and her cheerleaders on A2K: Are you able to retain in your minds this moment when two years hence Hillary is pandering to you in order to win the New Hampshire Primaries?
It looks like Hillary's strategy of acting like a moderate is not endearing her to the radicals these days. But surely they know shes one of them. I thought they were smarter than that. Or are they just playing dumb for now.
Finn,
Do you think that McCain can beat Jeb ?
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:LionTamerX wrote:Finn,
Do you think that McCain can beat Jeb ?
Yes
I hope you are right. I respect McCain, but I worry about what happened last time he tried out for the team.
I am safely on the left side of most issues.
If given the chance I will vote for McCain over Hillary any day. I respect his integrity and his courage on tough issues including immigration and the use of torture.
The fact I like and respect the guy means I can overlook the things I disagree with.
okie wrote:fishin' wrote:James Carville's new book "Take It Back" is along the same lines. The quip I picked up from him the other morning on the radio was that "Democrats need to grow a spine." and it falls in line with Ivins' piece.
Right or wrong, to mean much of anything in politics you have to stand for something. Wavering doens't get much traction.
Yeh, I for one would like to know what it is? Do any of you know?
These were all stated clearly in the launch post, but I will state them again for the reading-challenged...
The war in Iraq is a mistake and we should get out.
We want single-payer health care and we are willing to pay more taxes to get it.
We want to raise the minimum wage.
We want to repeal Bush's tax cuts, or at least those that go only to the rich.
We want to reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending, but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes.
We want to do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment. Big oil companies are gouging consumers and so we would support a windfall profits tax.
The talking point that Democrats "have no beliefs" is a buncha crap. Just something to say rather than argue ideas.
Always did like Molly. Wondered what she was up to and wish that I could get her syndicated column. Perhaps I could if I looked hard enough.
No politics as usual. I don't think that Hilary will get the nomination for that reason. Plus the obvious reason that she probably couldn't get elected.
We need Santos from "The West Wing".
Sumac
sumac wrote:Always did like Molly. Wondered what she was up to and wish that I could get her syndicated column. Perhaps I could if I looked hard enough.
No politics as usual. I don't think that Hilary will get the nomination for that reason. Plus the obvious reason that she probably couldn't get elected.
We need Santos from "The West Wing".
Sumac, if you go to this site and look at the list of columnists, you will find Molly Ivins and can read all of her columns.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
BBB
Thanks BBB. I've iconed her site to my desktop.