Reply
Fri 6 Jan, 2006 12:54 pm
Now you can donate to the party of your choice every time you shop:
Here are political donations, as reported by the Center for Responsive Politics:
WalMart, $467K, 97% to republicans;
K-Mart, $524K, 86% to republicans;
Home Depot, $298K, 89% to republicans;
Target, $226K, 70% to republicans;
Circuit City Stores, $261K, 95% to republicans;
3M Co., $281K, 87% to republicans;
Hallmark Cards, $319K, 92% to republicans;
Amway, $391K, 100% republican;
Kohler Co. (plumbing fixtures), $283K, 100% republicans;
B.F. Goodrich (tires), $215K, 97% to republicans;
Proctor & Gamble, $243K, 79% to republicans;
Brown-Forman Corp. (Southern Comfort, Jack Daniels, Bushmills, Korbel
wines - as well as Lennox China, Dansk, Gorham Silver), $644, 80% to
republicans;
Coors, $174K, 92% to republicans; (also Budweiser - sd)
Pilgrim's Pride Corp. (chicken), $366K, 100% republican;
Outback Steakhouse, $641K, 95% republican;
Tricon Global Restaurants (KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell),
$133K, 87% republican;
Brinker International (Maggiano's, Brinker Cafe, Chili's, On the Border,
Macaroni Grill, Crazymel's, Corner Baker, EatZis), $242K, 83% republican;
Waffle House, $279K, 100% republican;
McDonald's Corp., $197K, 86% republican;
Darden Restaurants (Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Smokey Bones, Bahama
Breeze), $121K, 89% republican;
Mariott International, $323K, 81% to republicans;
Holiday Inns, $38K, 71% to republicans.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
* Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, $153K, 99% to democrats;
* Estee Lauder, $448K, 95% to democrats;
* Guess ? Inc., $145K, 98% to democrats;
* Calvin Klein, $78K, 100% to democrats;
* Liz Claiborne, Inc., $34K, 97% to democrats;
* Levi Straus, $26K, 97% to democrats;
* Olan Mills, $175K, 99% to democrats.
* Rite Aid, $517K, 60% to democrats;
* Magla Products (Stanley tools, Mr. Clean), $22K, 100% to democrats;
* Gallo Winery, $337K, 95% to democrats;
* Southern Wine & Spirits, $213K, 73% to democrats;
* Joseph E. Seagrams & Sons (includes beverage business, plus considerable
media interests), $2M+, 67% democrats.
* Sonic Corporation, $83K, 98% democrat;
* Hyatt Corporation, $187K, 80% to democrats;
* Triarc Companies (Arby's, T.J. Cinnamon's, Pasta Connections), $112K,
96% democrats;
* Price Club/Costco donated $225K, of which 99% went to democrats;
* Warnaco (undergarments), $55K, 73% to democrats;
Target is 70% to Republicans?! I thought it was, y'know, Minnesota lefty.
The Target people at least have a semblance of social consciousness.
Can't say that about Walmart.
I guess you haven't heard my Target is evil
rant
Lay it on me. I'd hate to stop shopping there but it wouldn't be the end of the world...
Target surprised me too.
I meant to expand on this topic, but I hit the submit button too fast.
How many of you think about where you shop or what happens to your money after you let go of it? Does it matter if it ends up in the hands of people you would never give money to if asked?
If the worst government on earth asked you for a donation which came with a very cheap offer of underware, a food processor or a BBQ grill would you make the donation? I think we do that sometimes - we just call it Capitalism.
I didn't say they were good. Just a whole lot better than Walmart.
But then, so is possum ****.
Ideally, I try to find places that are responsible and have things I want to buy, for a good price -- I'd put IKEA in that category. (If someone tells me IKEA is evil I will so cry...)
If something is truly evil I won't buy from it, period.
I never think about where my money is going when I spend it. If it's cheaper, I buy it. Don't know if that's a good thing to be doin'...
The most evil of all would have to be IKEA.
But we all know that.
The family that founded IKEA supported the Nazis in WWII. It's hard to find saints in this world.
Hey, how come the Republicans have all the good places to eat?
bbbut NOW they're like really nice 'n' socially responsible 'n' stuff... right?
Haven't you ever been suspicious of all the clerks with those funny moustaches, soz?
Do a wikipedia on Target, soz.
I learned a lot about them when I was looking at manufacturing being outsourced to India and China.
Didn't like 'em before.
Now
But isn't wikipedia evil too?
;-)
OK OK I'm going...
ehBeth wrote:Do a wikipedia on Target, soz.
Wikipedia wrote:
Target Corporation faces criticism. Lots of negative publicity was generated from the company's decision to no longer allow the Salvation Army to collect donations at its stores (see Philanthropy section above).
Target allegedly engages in many practices that rival Wal-Mart faces criticism for engaging in; however, because of Target's smaller size in comparison to Wal-Mart, Target often escapes criticism. In addition, many people may overlook Target's practices because of its successful marketing to differentiate itself as being more upscale. Some questionable practices, like Wal-Mart, that Target allegedly engages in include: low hourly wages (lack of living wage), opposition to labor unions, and its contribution to urban sprawl.[17] Liza Featherstone, author of Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers' Rights at Wal-Mart, stated in an interview, "Aesthetically, we all like Target better, but their wages are in many places low or just as low, and they all represent the Wal-Martization of our economy, which is the exchange of low prices for poor work conditions." [18]
In 2002, the company came under criticism for carrying clothing with the number "88" embroidered on the clothing, which is known to be a white supremacist symbol. Target came under fire for not necessarily carrying the merchandise, but for their response. A customer informed the company of the offensive merchandise, but Target only responded with form letters and seemed to dismiss the customer's concerns. Only after the Southern Poverty Law Center and the media got involved, did Target pull the merchandise from its stores. [19]
A 26-year-old Missouri woman was refused emergency contraception when she handed her prescription to a pharmacist at a Target store in Fenton, MO, on September 30, 2005. The woman was told by the pharmacist, "I won't fill it. It's my right not to fill it." She was told that she could go to a local Walgreens instead. The woman said, "When the pharmacist told me she wouldn't [fill the prescription], I went from disbelief to shock to anger. I guess I'm still pretty angry. It seems unbelievable to me that a medical professional could/would deny access to a federally approved drug and impose their personal beliefs in a professional setting. I am also grateful that I did not need it filled at that time. I don't know how it would be if I had just been raped or if the condom broke and I was feeling confusion and panic anyway -- and then was denied access and told to go across the street."[20] Target allows employees to refuse to dispense medication based on religious beliefs; however, the employee must ensure that the prescription is filled by another pharmacist in a timely manner. Some defending Target would applaud the company for upholding the employee's freedom of conscience, while others feel this policy is a violation of customer rights.
That's it???? I'm surprised you guys can find
anywhere to shop.
ps... Wikipedia also writes:
Quote:Philanthropy
Target Corporation is consistently ranked as one of the most philanthropic companies in the country. According to a November 2005 Forbes article, it ranked as the highest cash giving company in America in percentage of income given (2.1%) [13]. Target donates around five percent of their pre-tax operating profit; it gives over $2 million a week in the communities it operates in. It also gives a percentage of charges from its Target Visa to schools designated by the cardholders. To date, Target has given over $150 million to schools across the United States through this program.
Target has a standard no-solicitation rule at its properties, as it wishes to provide a "distraction-free shopping experience for its guests". Exemptions to this policy were previously made for the Salvation Army to station its traditional red kettles and bell-ringers outside Target stores during the Christmas season. However, the company decided that it would no longer allow the Salvation Army to solicit on Target Stores' properties in 2004 because they believed it was a distraction to their guests and because an increasing number of other nonprofit groups also wanted to be granted exceptions to the "no solicitation" policy to support charity [14]. Many religious organizations objected to this decision, and called for boycotts of Target; however, this has failed as Target's financials over the last year have been setting company records and Target's same-store sales have been outperforming Wal-Mart. Additionally, when Target ousted the Salvation Army bell ringers, Target Corporation said that they planned on seeking an alternate method to donate to the organization. For example, Target donates annually to the United Way (the Salvation Army is a member of the United Way coalition).
On November 14, 2005, Target Corporation and the Salvation Army announced [15] a partnership called "The Target/Salvation Army Wish List," where online shoppers will be able to donate goods to the organization by buying them directly from Target.com [16] between November 25, 2005 and January 25, 2006. With this partnership, Target has guaranteed a minimum of $1 million of merchandise to the Salvation Army, making up the difference if the customers don't reach this goal, although the Salvation Army claimed that they typically raised $9 million with the red kettle program in front of Target stores. Annette Bauer, a spokeswoman for the Salvation Army's northern division, said "It is not going to make up the financial difference...but it is a great opportunity to partner with Target that might lead to other opportunities."
During disasters, Target Corporation is a major benefactor for relief efforts. Target provided monetary and product donations during the September 11th terrorist attacks on the U.S.; it also donated money for relief efforts for the tsunami in South Asia. Most recently, Target donated $1.5 million (U.S.) to the American Red Cross in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. It also allowed its store properties in the affected area to be used as command centers for relief organizations. It also donated supplies such as water and bug spray. Besides these major disasters, Target also regularly lends its support to disasters that are not as well known or only affect a regional area.
and
Quote:Target Corporation was named one of the "100 Best Companies for Working Mothers" in 2004 by Working Mothers magazine.
sozobe wrote:But isn't wikipedia evil too?
;-)
OK OK I'm going...
I'm definitely not a big wiki fan, but it organizes some of the info.
Do the Target/out-sourcing search on Google. <trying to remember some of the word combos I used when I was doing the China/India/American retailers search>
~~~~~
jpin - I'm quite a careful shopper - partly in terms of retailers I'll go to. Definitely not perfect, but there are a LOT of major retailers I won't set foot into. I try to find smaller wholesalers and retailers who appreciate my business - and make sure I don't get over-charged. Target, among other things, does not meet my cost for quality requirements.
It's interesting that Waffle House is like on every other corner in Florida, the much contested state... Are their waffles any better than IHOP?