1
   

THE MOST HORRENDOUS EVENT IN WRITTEN HISTORY

 
 
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 10:10 pm
I realize this is a subjective question. My intent is that you will limit your answers to documented world events. Of course, the interesting part is your support statements and references. Let the thinking begin!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,242 • Replies: 37
No top replies

 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 10:23 pm
Can I have two votes?

The Rwandan Genocides http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_Genocide

And the Khmer Rouge atrocities in Cambodia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Kampuchea

Both these distress me more than say the Nazi extermination programs because the international community was complicit in the crime. Genocide allowed for reasons of political expediency - with Western nations sewing the seeds of calamity but washing their hands of the dark harvest.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jan, 2006 10:32 pm
BM
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:02 am
It depends a lot on what you would regard as "horrendous".

How about the explosion of Santorini? Countless lives lost, and the utter destruction of one of the world's great civilizations. The event was felt over the entire earth, and may have had cultural impacts upon many human societies.

Closer to us in time, what can compare to the Black Death that reduced the European population by as much as one third. The Plague was the last straw in destabilizing a Feudal/church system that had endured a thousand years. I asked what could compare to the Black Death, how about the diseases that reduced the aboriginal inhabitants of the New World to perhaps a tenth of what existed before the arrival of Europeans.

It's pretty hard to be more "horrendous" than Mother Nature, but perhaps you reserve the term for the wanton acts of human cruelty. In that case, what are we looking for sheer numbers of deaths, percentages, or those acts that appear meaningless to "rational" minds?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:26 am
I am for human agency when it comes to horror.....the natural stuff is, in my view, awesome and tragic for we poor, bare, forked animals...but horror comes when it is planned and thought out.



I am finding it hard to differentiate between the Nazi holocaust, Stalin and Mao's decimation of their people, or the invasions of the Americas and Australia by white people.

I think that the genocides that occurred with these invasions were not especially planned...so I am going for one of the first three....not sure which yet.
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 01:12 am
"Written history" helps narrow it somewhat.


Do you actually mean 'horrendous' is in the consequences or fallout from the event or do you mean 'horrific' as in how much suffering was involved?
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 04:37 am
Actually, Mr. Stillwater, a combination of both, is that possible?

I believe the public has a very short memory re such events. Yes, Hurricane Katrina has caused great suffering; however, as the details become clearer, it was the lack of proper human workmanship on the dikes and lack of government leadership which lead to the extented kill zone. And contrary to immediate emotional suffering, I don't see this event at the top of our list.

My wish is to give life to those events in written history so that we can measure them against a Hurricane Katrina. Do what you can to give life to your nominee. Don't let us forget the details. Cause us to lift ourselves up out of our lifespan and experience the depth and sufferings of mankind over time.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 04:54 am
hingehead, I found your format helpful. Your quotation, "Despite intelligence provided before the killing began, and international news media coverage reflecting the true scale of violence as the genocide unfolded, virtually all first-world countries declined to intervene." Suggests darker motives among the FIRST-WORLD COUNTRIES. Your references certainly opened the door to serious readers.

If I would have added anything, it would be a bit more descriptive. Additional details, which would cause me to pause, think and click your offered URL.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 01:15 am
OK, what did I do to turn people off to this thread?
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 01:19 am
Perhaps the 'measuring things against Hurricane Katrina' did it. Maybe you should have gone with 'measured against Janet Jackson's tits-out moment'....
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 04:43 pm
I miss Abuzz's star ratings. But Stilly gets 5.

And he quotes David Byrne....

And has a new avatar.
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:02 pm
Mr. Stillwater, perhaps you are right.
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 01:41 am
Mapleleaf wrote:
Mr. Stillwater, perhaps you are right.


Probably. And a more than a few points to Hingehead, latest winner of the "Spot Stilly's Quote Competition".


Mapleleaf - we all end up with a topic (or three) that never quite makes it. Blame Gustaf or the Bunny, it is a never fail fall-back....
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jan, 2006 06:28 am
I know, but sometimes I am able to redirect the topic Smile
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jan, 2006 07:01 am
It seems an overwhelming task, there have been so many, and so diverse . . .
0 Replies
 
ralpheb
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jan, 2006 04:45 pm
For a simplistic answer I will go with WW II.


WIthin that I will pick the Batan Death March
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 05:07 pm
ralpheb,

For our historically disadvantaged, would you write a paragraph or two describing the march? Or a site URL?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 05:55 pm
sand creek massacre, colorado, usa
0 Replies
 
ralpheb
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 06:02 pm
http://home.pacbell.net/fbaldie/In_Retrospect.html

This should give some information on the death March
0 Replies
 
Harris Zellig
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 01:47 pm
"The most_(x)__in history"

is an invitation to oversimplification and superficiality.

Human history is too complex a process to be meaningfully reduced to simplified formulaic statements, although many notable people (including historians, philosophers, and economists) have tried to do just that.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE MOST HORRENDOUS EVENT IN WRITTEN HISTORY
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 08:29:56