0
   

The US, UN & Iraq III

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:38 am
blatham

Yes.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:42 am
Yeah, bernie ... very tired of it. But then, I'm tired of cleaning the barn long before I've gotten enough of it done to call the job finished. Ya gotta stick to it; it won't go away by itself.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:50 am
c.i., I learned it this way: I before E, except after C. Think of perceive, which is not covered by your rule.

HofT is well known to me on Abuzz' "Steer" thread. Onmymarc keeps all of us updated on new legislation about animal abuse and animal rights. It is a thread of long standing and has moments of sorrow and moments of hope. HofT doesn't post often; she is too busy.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 10:25 am
Maybe it's the 'shut it out of your mind' side effect of war that allows it to continue. Isn't history supposed to guide us into the future?

Just a thought
0 Replies
 
JamesMorrison
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 10:36 am
Gel,

Thanks for the textpad link

JM
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 10:49 am
JM, welcome ..... drag it's icon into the task bar for one click access
It has some pretty sophistcated search and replace features ... boolean etc..
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 12:03 pm
Kara, Thanks for clearing that up. My English language skills do not include words like "perceive," because that's a college word. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 12:07 pm
"In Iraq they went to one of Saddam's palaces, and here's what they found: a private zoo, Prozac and pictures of naked women. It's sort of like Michael Jackson's place -- except for the naked women."
-- David Letterman
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 12:11 pm
What's wrong with nikkid women? c.i.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 02:09 pm
whats wrong with this computer

I type, wait a few seconds, then the print appears
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 02:22 pm
ci hi there y o u a r e

(w i c i c o u l d o n e d i c i w i l e wi t i n g f o r a r i p l i ?)

Pse don't tak on bord spellin tips from mericuns. They know nuffink with the honourable exception of Kara, who knows evryfink
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 02:25 pm
yes it was a bottle of bordeaux AND amazingly, my computer seems to thrive on it. Tomorrow I will pour Rioja in the monitor if it doesn't behave.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 02:30 pm
Steve, Laughing
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 03:15 pm
Steve

For tomorrow morning:
either the American
http://www.aspirin.com/images/main/main_as_pr1a_all.jpg

or the French way
http://www.rouge-blanc.com/Images/Vins/V-196.gif
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 03:22 pm
Calvin Trillin, in the 4/28 Nation
Quote:

EVERYTHING GEORGE
BUSH NEEDS TO KNOW
HE LEARNED ON THE
PLAYGROUND

Let's say that from the east while you look south
An icy snowball hits you in the mouth.
You see the kid who did it run, the wretch,
But he proves quite impossible to catch.
He's gone. So you, your anger quite unsated
Beat up another kid you've always hated.

You hit him from above and underneath.
Then smash his nose and rearrange his teeth.
Yes, pound on him until that dreadful punk'll
Have no alternative to crying uncle.
Though he is not the wretch too fast to chase
It's hard to tell that once you've smashed his face.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 03:25 pm
http://www.bushmills.com/images/BMA21.gif

I'm Irish.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 03:28 pm
Whiskey on Bordeaux - timber, even my good old days I knew THAT result!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 03:29 pm
(A good old highland malt, yes, that could do some help.)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 04:48 pm
some are getting a little tipsy......
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 05:32 pm
After yesterdays schmozzle, wherein I probably lost an old friend, I was not going to set foot on this thread again. But the following announcement of US intent as regards Iraq can't go unmentioned. Three weeks or so ago, I expressed my suspicion that the US was not planning to leave Iraq at all, but wanted to utilize it as their military base in the mid-east. Adding this element into the equation was coherent with what the boys in charge appeared to be reaching for, including their stance as regards the UN before the war and after. It is only now they are admitting it.

What are the chances, do you all suppose, that the US will EVER allow an election wherein the poll-leading party, regardless of its other platform positions, has also advanced the policy position of US troops and facilities leaving their country? And what word, do you suppose, best describes such a state of affairs?
Quote:
Pentagon Expects Long-Term Access to Four Key Bases in Iraq
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/20/international/worldspecial/20BASE.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 05:23:37