Setanta wrote:A good point except for the allegation that there is good corroborative evidence for Hey-Zeus . . . ain't no sucha thing . . .
GW has a very telling point in that the old dodger Eusebius (flourished in the early 4th century) identifies Ramses II as the pharaoh at the time of the exodus. Ramses was one pharaoh about whom a great many records survive--but no parting of the Red Sea, no drowning army.
Mr. Setanta,
Good morning, Mr. Setanta! How are you this fine morning, sir?
It's a bit rainy here in Louisiana today.
Mr. Setanta, isn't it true that things were often stricken from records
Weren't there times the pharoahs and others would decree that a name was never to be spoken again or it was to be expunged from all records?
I am not 100% positive of that but I heard it somewhere. :wink:
Also Mr. Setanta, do you really think that the Egyptians (who still didn't believe in God) after the Exodus, would actually write all that down? Don't you think it's possible they would leave it out for fear others might then beleive and turn from the ways of the Egyptians?
I don't think that Noah's ark, the Garden of Eden, etc., will ever be found. Christianity is based on faith in God and not proof of God.
I hope you have a great day Mr. Setanta.