1
   

Parting of the Red sea?

 
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:25 am
I assume ya'll also take the Virgin Birth and everything else literally, also?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:26 am
You mean you don't?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:27 am
Intrepid wrote:
God is Spirit... not man

Well, I know. But then why would God be called a "He"? Just wondering.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:28 am
Momma Angel wrote:
You mean you don't?

It makes more sense to me to read it more like poetry.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:28 am
Because we call Him the Father.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:29 am
Maybe a male dominance thing with the bible writer's? ???
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:31 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Because we call Him the Father.

I know. But why? Why is God called the Father? Why not the Mother? Or why not just God? I'm just wondering what the reason is that God is referred to in the masculine. (not trying to incite a riot... you know that)
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:32 am
Well, maybe because God considers Himself a he? Jesus called Him the father so that really tends me to believe the father is a he.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:33 am
Intrepid wrote:
Maybe a male dominance thing with the bible writer's? ???

Hmmm....If so, why should it be continued that way? If it was only a prejudice of the writers?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:33 am
Well..... Jesus already had a mother ;-)
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:33 am
Good point Intrepid. Why didn't I think of that?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:34 am
uummmm
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:35 am
Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:36 am
Intrepid wrote:
Well..... Jesus already had a mother ;-)

You really don't think that Joseph was Jesus' Earthly father? After all, it is through Joseph that the Davidic line is traced.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:37 am
Joseph was not Jesus' biological father.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:37 am
You can decide for yourself according to the bible.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:41 am
Intrepid wrote:
You can decide for yourself according to the bible.

I don't get it. Decide what?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:43 am
What do ya'll think about the Apocrypha, esp. the Nag Hammadi scriptures?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:44 am
I believe they are books written by imposters and not true disciples.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Dec, 2005 12:44 am
Really? Why would you think that? I have found them truly insighful.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 04:21:56