For whatever it's worth, the article paradork is citing is not available on the inernet or at least not free of charge and I don't PAY for bullshit, all there really is is the one paragraph abstract which is just an unsupported claim. One of the authors' names turns up in another pubmed abstract titled:
Quote:"What hysteria? A systematic study of newspaper coverage of accused child molesters."
which I assume to mean that the dickhead never saw a bullshit ritual abuse case which he didn't like but, then, that's the short of **** I expect from paradork and monkeyjerk here and that's why I generally vote their **** down unread.
Basically, all such cases have proven to be bogus over a period of time, with the one guy, Fuster, remaining in prison simply due to inertia.