oralloy wrote:
I think the difference of opinion centers on the word "human".
I reject the proposition that members of al-Qa'ida have human rights.
That said, I see no reason why we have to offend European sensibilities by conducting torture on their soil. We can torture just as well elsewhere.
That is quite silly. Members of al- Qaeda, just like any other humans on the planet, have human rights. Those are not given and taken away by other people or states, they are only implemented or denied and violated. But they inherently belong to each human being just by their being human. From cradle to grave. Nothing you can do about that. They are inalienable.
Torture doesn't yield good results anyway.People confess to anything under torture. Many of the confessions are doubtable, to say the least. Plus it brings the torturers to the level of criminals in my book.
When you torture someone for months and then determine that person turns out to be innocent.... do you apologize nicely? How does that work? How is that ok according to you? will be curious to hear an answer.