Stevepax wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:Nonetheless, giving up the effort to leave Iraq with a stable democracy because a bunch of thugs plant bombs and kidnap and murder civilian hostages would be the wrong thing to do. The fact that the enemy is tough and clever is no reason to give up. Hey, let's send a message to the world that you can make the US abandon any war effort by a campaign of terrorism.
The thugs weren't there before we made it possible for them. Let Iraq sort it out. They have already decided they want an Islamic Theocracy, not a democracy. Read their constitution and see if you can grasp what it says.
Letting Iraq "sort it out" might amount to not protecting a weak democracy from resourceful fascists. The left's fascination with the fact that the insurgents weren't there before we invaded is merely stupid. They weren't there before because the country was ruled by a dictator who could easily have chased them out. He would have simply done something like round up all suspected insurgents, insurgent sympathizers, and their families, and shoot them. Your attempt to use their opposition to the new Iraqi government to prove that their misdeeds are our fault is absurd. Sometimes when you engage an enemy, as we have engaged Islamic terrorists globally, they fight back and are, for a time, more dangerous than had you let them proceed unchecked.