1
   

Priests urge stem cell opposition

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 04:53 pm
Priests urge stem cell opposition

Quote:
Missouri Catholic dioceses direct sermons to fight research

Monday, November 28, 2005; Posted: 12:28 a.m. EST (05:28 GMT)



JEFFERSON CITY, Missouri (AP) -- The battle over embryonic stem cell research moved into the pews Sunday, as Roman Catholic priests across Missouri urged churchgoers to oppose a petition seeking a constitutional amendment that would protect the controversial work.


The petition drive was announced last month by a group of business leaders, patient advocates and researchers as a response to legislative efforts to ban a type of stem cell research known as therapeutic cloning.

Missouri's Catholic dioceses oppose it, and urged their priests statewide to begin a campaign Sunday aimed at keeping Catholics from signing the petition.

At St. Peter Catholic Church, across the street from the state Capitol, the Rev. James Smith quoted Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels and compared the cultivation of human embryos for research to the gruesome experiments performed on concentration camp occupants during World War II.

"The similarities of the arguments behind the destruction of life by the Nazis and the use of human embryos [for stem cell research] are scary," he told hundreds of worshippers at a morning Mass. "There are real human lives that need our support and protection."

The petition seeks to put a measure on the 2006 ballot that would amend the state constitution to state that stem cell research, therapies and cures allowed under federal law also are permitted in Missouri. The measure would prohibit human cloning, defined as the effort to create a baby by implanting an embryo that wasn't fertilized by sperm.

Supporters argue stem cells may have the potential to cure spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and other life-threatening diseases.

Opponents contend the use of embryonic stem cells involves creating human life to destroy it.

"Human embryos are not potential human beings. Human embryos are human beings with potential," John Weaver, deacon of Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Columbia, told worshippers Sunday.

Donn Rubin, chairman of the petition coalition, Missouri Coalition for Lifesaving Cures, said surveys show most Missouri Catholics support stem cell research.

Republican Gov. Matt Blunt and former U.S. Sen. John Danforth, an ordained Episcopal priest and former U.N. ambassador, are among the measure's supporters.

The petition drive must have about 145,000 valid signatures by May 9 to secure a spot on the November 2006 ballot.

A constitutional amendment would require a simple majority of voters to be enacted and would supersede any state laws.


The Church by this action has chosen to step out of it's roll as spiritual advisor to it's flock and enter the political arena.. Havimg immersed itself in the politics of the land and is lobbying to impose it's religious beliefs upon the population at large . It would appear in view of this they should no longer be entitled to a tax exempt status.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,463 • Replies: 29
No top replies

 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 05:24 pm
the position of the roman catholic church is a religious postion. it is not a scientific one.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 05:36 pm
kuvasz

True. However, how is that relevant to my question.
0 Replies
 
rodeman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 07:21 pm
While I respect the church and it's positions on these issues. This is religious dogma...I sincerely hope none of these catholics come down with an illness that could have been cured by this stem cell research.

Hell, why not go back to the crusades...............?
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 07:27 pm
goldie, i think any religion that takes in money ough to be taxed on it.

so you question is moot to me.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 08:44 pm
Re: Priests urge stem cell opposition
au1929 wrote:
The Church by this action has chosen to step out of it's roll as spiritual advisor to it's flock and enter the political arena.. Havimg immersed itself in the politics of the land and is lobbying to impose it's religious beliefs upon the population at large . It would appear in view of this they should no longer be entitled to a tax exempt status.


There is nothing in any law that prohibits tax emempt groups from taking a position on any issue - political or not. It would appear that your view isn't based on any sort of reality.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Nov, 2005 07:38 am
Fishin
Recently the lose of tax exempt status has been cautioned when church leaders have from the pulpit and otherwise suggested "Told" parishioners how to vote.
Would this be a similar situation or to far a stretch?
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Nov, 2005 05:43 pm
au1929 wrote:
Recently the lose of tax exempt status has been cautioned when church leaders have from the pulpit and otherwise suggested "Told" parishioners how to vote.
Would this be a similar situation or to far a stretch?


In the cases you are referring to the priests/pastors/ministers referred to a political personality running for or holding public office by either name or position. Doing that runs afoul of the laws governing tax exempt groups. They are prohibited from saying "Vote for Nancy Grace!" or vote for the Democrat/Republican running for mayor!" (or "Vote against...!")

They are totally allowed to take a position on a specific issue though. NARAL and Planned Parenthood are two examples of tax-exampt groups that take issue positions on abortion, The NRA-ILA and the Brady Campaign take positions on gun control, etc.. Religious groups fall into the same category as these other tax-exempt groups.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 05:27 am
During the 2004 campaign, when the pro-choice Kerry is running against the pro-life Bush, the head of the Catholic Church in Colorado says that any Catholic who votes for a pro-choice candidate is required to go to confession to atone for the sin.

Sounds like advocacy to me.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 06:04 am
Any pronouncement by the Catholic Church on any moral issue is a big fat joke, as far as i am concerned.

The Catholic Church has gotten a such a free ride on this sex abuse scandal, that the press coverage is a scandal in and of itself.

First, Father Bruce Ritter was held up as the shining example of Catholic social action through his Covenant House. Turns out that he was a pedophile. That news lasted about three days in the papers. For several years, the press boosts Ritter and Covenant House to the skies, and when the Ritter is exposed they put it on the front page for a day or two and forget about it.

Fact is, Ritter expanded Covenant House's operations internationally, and turned the whole operation into an international sex trafficking ring. Read much about that in the papers? Hah!

Then, sometime in the late nineties, some diocese down in Texas had to pay $20 million dollars in sex abuse settlements. How big was that played up in the rest of the country? Hardly at all. How many editors had the guts to send investigative reporters to take a hard look at the goings on in the Catholic Church? None that I heard of. Catholics comprise 25% of the US population, so the editors were afraid of losing a quarter of their readers.

Here in Connecticut, where almost half the population is Catholic, when yet another priest is found out, the news reports on the state TV stations call it "another chapter in the agony of the Catholic Church". As if the Catholic church is the victim of sex abuse, instead of the perpetrators. Unbelievable.

Can anyone imagine any other institution, religious or not, which would get such a free ride from the press and the governemnt if these things were exposed? I can't. Can you imagine is a school system or a government agency did anything like this? Or a privately run firm? There would be investigative reporters giving front page coverage of virtually every victim, government task forces would be set up to both prosecute and to make up legislation to prevent it from happening again. Any of this stuff happen to the Catholic Church? No.

My advice to the Roman Catholic Church would be: Given the amazing free ride you have received from the government and press-a free ride nobody else would get-the sane thing to do would be to SHUT UP on any and all moral pronouncements until you have done a very thorough, very public housecleaning and issued such mea culpas as are necessary that you have indeed come clean. Even then, it will take years, perhaps decades, before anything the Catholic Church says can be taken seriously as having any moral force whatsoever.

Instead of doing this, however, the Catholic Church is still in damage control mode on the sex scandals, and is getting aggressively outspoken on moral and social issues. And the press plays along, letting them get away with it.

What a public shame.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:22 am
kelticwizard wrote:
Any pronouncement by the Catholic Church on any moral issue is a big fat joke, as far as i am concerned.

The Catholic Church has gotten a such a free ride on this sex abuse scandal, that the press coverage is a scandal in and of itself.

First, Father Bruce Ritter was held up as the shining example of Catholic social action through his Covenant House. Turns out that he was a pedophile. That news lasted about three days in the papers. For several years, the press boosts Ritter and Covenant House to the skies, and when the Ritter is exposed they put it on the front page for a day or two and forget about it.

Fact is, Ritter expanded Covenant House's operations internationally, and turned the whole operation into an international sex trafficking ring. Read much about that in the papers? Hah!

Then, sometime in the late nineties, some diocese down in Texas had to pay $20 million dollars in sex abuse settlements. How big was that played up in the rest of the country? Hardly at all. How many editors had the guts to send investigative reporters to take a hard look at the goings on in the Catholic Church? None that I heard of. Catholics comprise 25% of the US population, so the editors were afraid of losing a quarter of their readers.

Here in Connecticut, where almost half the population is Catholic, when yet another priest is found out, the news reports on the state TV stations call it "another chapter in the agony of the Catholic Church". As if the Catholic church is the victim of sex abuse, instead of the perpetrators. Unbelievable.

Can anyone imagine any other institution, religious or not, which would get such a free ride from the press and the governemnt if these things were exposed? I can't. Can you imagine is a school system or a government agency did anything like this? Or a privately run firm? There would be investigative reporters giving front page coverage of virtually every victim, government task forces would be set up to both prosecute and to make up legislation to prevent it from happening again. Any of this stuff happen to the Catholic Church? No.

My advice to the Roman Catholic Church would be: Given the amazing free ride you have received from the government and press-a free ride nobody else would get-the sane thing to do would be to SHUT UP on any and all moral pronouncements until you have done a very thorough, very public housecleaning and issued such mea culpas as are necessary that you have indeed come clean. Even then, it will take years, perhaps decades, before anything the Catholic Church says can be taken seriously as having any moral force whatsoever.

Instead of doing this, however, the Catholic Church is still in damage control mode on the sex scandals, and is getting aggressively outspoken on moral and social issues. And the press plays along, letting them get away with it.

What a public shame.



http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/brian/blasphem.jpg

Blasphemer! You're only making it worse for yourself!

btw: there is a new choir carol recently approved by his Holiness, "Thank Heavens for little boys!"
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:27 am
So this thread is nothing more than another screed against a religious organization?

Gee, that is so rare these days... :rolleyes:
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:36 am
McGentrix
Religion. The evil empire.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:53 am
McGentrix wrote:
So this thread is nothing more than another screed against a religious organization?

Gee, that is so rare these days... :rolleyes:


Gee right back at you.

how about it is highlighting the hypocrisy of the RCC attempting to use the moral high ground about stem cell research when it has systemically fought to clean out its own house from the perfidity and reprehensible streak of pedophilia. the actions of the church, the church itself, not the individual priests is reprehensible in this situation. the hierarchy itself allowed pedophilic priests to be transferred from parish to parish without either disciplining them or forcing them into therapy.

the result was even more little boys were raped... we are not talking about one or two or even a dozen.. we are talking about hundreds.

I am sure you do not support that. I am sure you find it as reprehensible as i do.

and, merely for the sake of an argument, I am not about to use a typical right wing smear on you by saying in an accusatory tone that "if you defend the church you must obviously support pedophilia"

its that same "you are with us or against us" crap we hear so often from the right wing.

but you know how easy that type of smear and logical fallicy passes the lips from right wingers about other topics.

the "cover-our-ass" attitude of the RCC in relief to the current drive to stop stem cell research shows that the Church has only a pedistrian relationship with morality.

If the church does not like stem cell research that is just fine. jews dont eat pork and i could care less about shoving a ham sandwich down a jew's throat. but stem cell research affects catholic and non-catholic alike, so when the Church attempts to use the "moral authority" of the Bishop of Rome to sway the public, there is every right for those who support stem cell research to point out the hypocrisy of the church in other matters.

btw: do you know what i did last wednesday?

I was at the catholic social services food drive and i filled boxes with food for poor families in the area. so i know damn right well the good things that the church does in my area. but I am not what one would consider a catholic, because i do not accept the rules of the church. I go to mass for my own reasons and it is not to worship as a "Catholic." i go because it is a place for me to revel in the mysteries of it all, and that is as a "catholic" with a small "c."
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 09:53 am
No more homosexual
priests, says church




NEWS WIRE SERVICES


Quote:
VATICAN CITY - In the first major ruling of Pope Benedict's reign, the Catholic Church yesterday imposed restrictions on homosexuals becoming priests, although it said there would be no crackdown on gays who have already been ordained.The ruling came in a long-awaited, eight-page Vatican document that has already sparked controversy after widespread leaks in the past few weeks.

Its strict line on the place of gays in the clergy has won praise from conservatives and condemnation from liberals. There is already a shortage of men seeking to enter the priesthood, and critics say the ruling will only deepen the crisis.

The "instruction" by the Vatican's Congregation for Catholic Education says men "who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called 'gay culture'" cannot be admitted to seminaries. The only exception would be for those with a "transitory problem" that had been overcome for at least three years.The urgency of the document has been highlighted by a sexual scandal in the United States three years ago, involving mostly abuse of boys by priests. Gay-rights groups and others accuse the church of using homosexuals as scapegoats for the pedophile scandals.

The instruction says gays must be "accepted with respect." But in a commentary in the Vatican newspaper, Msgr. Tony Anatrella, a French Jesuit, said homosexuality risked "destabilizing people and society," had no social or moral value and could never match the importance of the relationship between a man and a woman.

The U.S-based Human Rights Campaign called on all Catholics, regardless of sexual orientation, to complain to their local pastors.

"We're speaking to Catholics in the pews and urging them to consider what Jesus would do if he saw his neighbor treated this way," it said in a statement.


None except those who are already in the priesthood or The only exception would be for those with a "transitory problem" that had been overcome for at least three years.
Makes you wonder does it not about the level of understanding.

Any solution but the one that would solve the priest shortage and would no longer make the priesthood a magnet fot homosexuals
Marriage restrictions removed.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 03:44 pm
kelticwizard wrote:
During the 2004 campaign, when the pro-choice Kerry is running against the pro-life Bush, the head of the Catholic Church in Colorado says that any Catholic who votes for a pro-choice candidate is required to go to confession to atone for the sin.

Sounds like advocacy to me.


The words used were:

"Any Catholics who vote for candidates who stand for abortion, illicit stem cell research or euthanasia... any Catholic politician who would promote so-called "same-sex marriage" and any Catholic who would vote for that political candidate place themselves outside the full communion of the Church and may not receive Holy Communion until they have recanted their positions and been reconciled by the Sacrament of Penance.

--Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs May 1, 2004"


You will note that there is no reference to John Kerry and no reference to any specific office. Was he referring to Kerry? Or was he referring to any/all candidates running for every office including the city dog catcher? His statement is advocating that people vote on ISSUES in conjunction with Church doctrine which is entirely within the IRS rules and tax laws.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 04:44 pm
Fishin

Two words. Religious blackmail.
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:13 pm
Absolutely no different than someone with Planned Parenthood telling their members that they should not vote for anyone who is anti-abortion since by doing so would be damaging to their cause.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 08:47 pm
CoastalRat wrote:
Absolutely no different than someone with Planned Parenthood telling their members that they should not vote for anyone who is anti-abortion since by doing so would be damaging to their cause.


really? i doubt it.

kindly present data on those who join the roman catholic church predominantly because of its positon on abortion, because that is a large part of why people join Planned Parenthood.

btw: show where Planned Parenthood is casting out or denying membership to its organization to those who are expressing and acting on their conscience, because that is exactly what the RCC is attempting to do.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Nov, 2005 09:48 pm
Stem cells conjoin to urge opposition to priests...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Priests urge stem cell opposition
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/16/2025 at 03:42:26