Just because Frolic asserts that our soldiers are taking "go pills" doesn't make it so. What evidence is there that soldiers now serving in the Iraq Theater of Operations are taking "speed"? Frolic seems to rest his accusation on a Friendly Fire accident in afghanistan sometime back. The American Air Force pilot had taken a "go pill" prescribed by the flight surgeon to offset exhaustion of a very long mission. If I remember correctly the board of enquiry determined that the "pill" played no significant roll in the friendly Fire incident. The Navy doesn't issue the "go pills", and no one has ever accused the ground forces of having a policy to supply "speed" to our soldiers.
So. Frolic, will you please supply the source of the information you've led this thread off with?
Quote:When did the 3th Infantry ever sleep on their way to Bagdad?
Why are the US soldiers so easy on the trigger?
Why are there so many Blue on Blue(friendly fire) incidents?
Why are so many civilians killed by accident?
They took their sleep where they could find it; in their vehicles and during those periods when their units were "off line". In combat, our body's chemistry changes -- attention becomes more focused, and the body tends to "reject" the idea of exhaustion. Young men can handle those stresses pretty well, especially if they are in good physical condition. Old men like us, need our sleep.
U.S. soldiers are NOT easy on the trigger. What do you have to prove such an assertion? I believe that our troops have shown remarkable restraint. Even when fired upon, they're withholding fire when civilians are at risk. War criminals use churches, hospitals, and schools to attack our soldiers, but only rarely do our troops return fire as they are permitted to under the rules of war. U.S. troops are highly disciplined, and they are not just "shooting up the town".
There are probably fewer Friendly Fire incidents in this campaign than in any in the last hundred years. Precision munitions, and the extraordinary care taken in their delivery makes the risk of FF much lower than in earlier conflicts. Given the number of missions, and the amount of munitions expended, the numbers of casualties is remarkably low.
We can not know at present how many civilian casualties have occurred. I expect that when the dust clears we will find that the number of civilian casualties will also be remarkably low. Many of the civilians who have been injured, or killed, may well have been the victims of Iraqi forces. AA fired into the air, does come back to earth and civilians are made casualties. Iraqi security forces have murdered civilians to coerce them into carrying out orders to fight against coalition forces. Tactics like using human shields, or siting their military assets in, or close to civilian neighborhoods, must also account for many civilian casualties. Those civilian casualties are the responsibility of saddam and the Ba'athist regime, not the United States.
Why is it Frolic that you hate the United States so much?